Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 20 September 2006 15:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By B I promise that this is not a wind up! I work for a charity which provides support to adults with learning disabilities. I was contacted by one of our managers today regarding a cooking course which we support some of the service users to participate in – basic stuff, cakes, biscuits etc. The college they go attend to take the course is now insisting that all participants, including our staff who support the service users, wear black (and apparently they are very emphatic about the black part) safety shoes at all times on the course. Various people have argued with them but they are not budging. I have told the manager to ask for the risk assessment which identifies the need for safety shoes and am waiting for it to come through but thought I’d ask for the opinion of others as to whether this seems an appropriate measure to take? Am I alone in thinking that this is completely over the top? Safety shoes… on a cooking course? If I’m missing something here please let me know – this is by no means my area of expertise and I stand ready and willing to be corrected but I just can’t see the necessity! Thanks in advance for your comments. B
Admin  
#2 Posted : 20 September 2006 15:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Altoft Might not be over the top at all -- Could be a non slip as opposed to a toe cap type requirement - lot of guidance issued recently from HSE on catering and kitchen as well as other food and drink related industry situations - have you looked there ??
Admin  
#3 Posted : 20 September 2006 15:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Taylor14 All ours wear them, risks are spillage of hot foods liquids, floor wet/slippery through precipitation, dropping of knives/ kichen equipment makes perfect sense to me
Admin  
#4 Posted : 20 September 2006 15:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson Kentucky Fried Chicken were prosecuted not so long ago for not providing safety shoes in their cooking area and a chap got severly burned as a result, to such an extent that KFC have had to review their policy and now provide them! so case law is out there!
Admin  
#5 Posted : 20 September 2006 15:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By B Thanks for your responses - that does make sense. We are not necessarily objecting to providing the shoes, just querying their necessity. It can be a different member of staff who provides support every week and funds are limited! Bear in mind that we are not talking about professional catering environments so I would imagine the risks would be considerably less than somewhere like KFC (and probably less than in the service user's own kitchens at home!), however the college is probably just trying to cover their own back, which is fair enough, and it is probably what has prompted this new rule! Does anyone have any ideas on the 'black' stipulation? Thanks for the responses - very helpful. B
Admin  
#6 Posted : 20 September 2006 15:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TBC Maybe the 'black' part of the shoes is some fetish! I can see the need, but surely it would normally be white in a kitchen environment.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 20 September 2006 15:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Darren J Fraser Can understand the requirement to wear safety shoes. Black may be for appearance reasons, but contact the college for reason why. If funding is limited, you could consider contacting one of the larger suppliers of safety equipment (Arco, Buck&Hickman to name just 2) and see if they would be willing to provide free of charge in return for advertising/endorsement - they can only say no at the end of the day.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 20 September 2006 15:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Altoft Kitchens are not my area but two guesses 1) College might be trying to prevent harm but cannot easily relax selected control measures for occasional users 2) Black might show food related splashes and hence a lack of cleanliness more than mixed colours (or might be historical from days when serving staff wore uniforms which were black and which continues to be seen in waiting staff attire/uniforms even in some pubs etc) I stress these are guesses R
Admin  
#9 Posted : 20 September 2006 18:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Saracen11 Hi B, I think this stipulation is over the top. From what you say and from experience, the people involved in this activity would not be exposed to such risks that would necessitate the need to wear safety shoes? A good strong leather, fully closed and laced shoe is what I would recommend to anyone that works in any kitchen. I'm aware of the cases that other people have referred to but in this case... I agree with the comment about asking to see their RA and how they arrived at their decision to stipulate this. I would be interested (if it were me) in what the catering staff in the college kitchen wore. Regards
Admin  
#10 Posted : 21 September 2006 12:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson Kitchens are dangerous places, especially for people who are 'disadvantaged' it does not take rocket science to see that if you slip with a hot pan of water / kettle etc someone can get seriously injured. We owe a higher duty of care to those in our community who may not undertand / be aware of the risks young / old / disabled etc.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 22 September 2006 01:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Saracen11 Hi B, Dave I agree, which is why I think if the hazards cannot be controlled by means other than offering PPE, a person in this situation may have to accept that the risks are too high and their safety comes before learning a new skill... The class sounds like a 'cook-and-eat' type scenario, and I maintain that safety shoes are OTT. (Have you seen the time?) Night night world... Sleepy regards
Admin  
#12 Posted : 22 September 2006 12:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Incolumitas B Have they actually specified what they mean by "safety" shoes, as this is a loose term that could mean anything depending upon the risk they are intended to mitigate? So if their risk assessment identifies "safety shoes" as a control measure, it must specify what the safety shoe needs to be designed to protect against. As someone who spends a couple of hours each morning cooking breakfasts, and a few evenings a week preparing dinners as well (busy Guest House with Taste of Scotland Accreditation), I would always wear leather shoes which completely cover the foot and have oil resistant non-slip soles. I would NOT need steel toe caps or mid-soles. However, in a larger kitchen with, for example the big two handed pans,the toecap is not a bad idea As for the black, dunno. May be uniform, or may be just for pastry and cake classes so that unclean shoes are clearly visible. most on the market are white for catering, but black are available as well
Admin  
#13 Posted : 22 September 2006 12:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Malcolm Hogarth Some good replies as usual. Black shoes - Rubbish Safety footwear - maybe, depending on the risk etc However..... the College may be bound by requirements of the Adult Learning Inspectorate or other bodies and do not have a great deal of choice themselves. If they do not do what the inspectors tell them they may be penalised - for example by withdrawing funding. It does appear on the face of it to be safety gone mad though.(I did an evening course in woodworking a couple of years ago and they did not provide hearing protection and a computor course where the chairs were not DSE compliant because we were not users) My advice - talk to them again and try to come to a pragmatic solution. You could also speak to the local Environmental Health Department for advice and assistance. The bottom line though I guess is that if that is what the College require you either go there or you don't. (How many of us require our client to wear Hi vis when they cannot see the reason? - No answer required!!) Malcolm
Admin  
#14 Posted : 22 September 2006 14:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By B Thanks for all the responses. My thoughts were that safety shoes (they haven't specified as to what sort, just 'safety shoes') were a bit over the top. As I said, in professional kitchens, high risk environments, I can understand the reasoning for requiring non slip, hard toed shoes, but I don't think this environment is that hazardous. Now sturdy, enclosed shoes I can completely agree with, and I would have something to say if a member of staff tried to show up in, say, flip-flops. Dave: I completely agree with you re duty of care to the service users, but I was specifically talking about the requirement for staff to wear safety shoes when supporting the service users, not the service users themselves. I am still waiting for the RA to come through and hope it will shed some light on the issue. As you said Malcolm, if the college decide that it is an absolute requirement then we will just have to get on with it! Thanks again B
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.