Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 28 September 2006 21:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Barry Cooper Hi, I have investigated an serious accident and now in the process of writing the report. My format has always been: Introduction, Event summary, Facts, Causes -immediate and contributory, Conclusions, Reccommendations, Our HR manager says the reccommendations should come after the Introduction, as these will not then be clouded by the rest of the report. I Would appreciate your opinions and advice Barry
Admin  
#2 Posted : 28 September 2006 21:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By sagalout I think it was Churchill who was quoted as saying " I only read the front page of any report". Maybe that is where your manager is coming from? I am a busy manager, I know we have had an accident, I know you have investigated it, I trust your competence, tell me what you are saying we need to do. If I dont recognise why you are saying it, I can look at the detail to find out. It is more important to identify your audience than to stick slavishly to any order of contents. Pete
Admin  
#3 Posted : 29 September 2006 07:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson Agreed with sagalout; all of my reports start with conclusion and recommendations. All else is in report with technical bits in appendix. Directors and managers need enough information to make informed decision and justify spending time, money and energy on taking action. Workers need more general information. Technical specialists and enforcers need the appendices. Regards Adrian Watson R
Admin  
#4 Posted : 29 September 2006 09:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ali You could try HSG 245 "Investigating Accidents & Incidents" produced by the HSE.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 29 September 2006 11:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Safetynut 1. Incident Description 2. Outcome 3. Main Findings from Investigation 4. Immediate Causes 5. Immediate Actions 6. Contributory Factors 7. Initial Lessons Learned (Senior management actions to address underlying causes( 8. Incident Photographs 9. Witness Statements
Admin  
#6 Posted : 29 September 2006 15:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By LJS I have just commenced my Diploma and they were telling is us only this Tuesday that the recommendations come at the end of the report...
Admin  
#7 Posted : 29 September 2006 17:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Edward Shyer LJS. I would agree with you however I was once told by a tutor at the diploma assignment brief discussion to put recommmendations and conclusions at the front of the report. This tutor left and when I submitted my assignment the internal marker deducted marks because I did not place these at the end of the report (still got a C but could have quite easily been a referal). I now place an executive summary at the front of any report and this includes any recommendations. Regards Ted
Admin  
#8 Posted : 29 September 2006 17:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By sagalout LJS, Remember there is often a difference between what is required for academic study and what is expected by colleagues in the real world. That is not to criticise the academic process rather to recognise that the real world brings its own unique demands tnhat need to be managed. If the managers in an organisation have a style of working then that is the thing to look out for just as much as how you may have been taught to outline a report. Of course for your study you need to follow the lead given by your tutors. Pete
Admin  
#9 Posted : 01 October 2006 12:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Shillabeer Not a sales pitch but an excellent training course run by IOSH on accident investigation will help you prepare reports fit for court. Look on the IOSH website. I've done it and it is very good.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 01 October 2006 14:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham I have to agree with sagalout. Remember that the purpose of a report to management is to inform and to assist them in taking the appropriate action. They have many pressures on their time, so the simpler and shorter the better. In my training on business management it was drummed into me that what managers are looking for in a report is 1. Purpose (What is this report for and why) 2. Conclusions (What was the outcome of any investigation, pilot project etc.) 3. Recommendations (What are we expected now to do as a result of the conclusions) I the manager then feels he needs to look in greater detail at the events and the reasons for the conclusions these can be at whatever length is necessary, but the initial first three sections should be brief and to the point. I tend to keep the body of the report as pertinent to the particular project as possible, keeping technical background in the appendices (these are often much longer than the actual report). An academic or scientific study is something completely different, produced for a different purpose. Of course, some have an "executive summary" in the form of an abstract. As a busy manager I tend to read the abstract first. This tells me if the main study is something I need to read in depth. Without the abstract, would I have the time to read the whole report? I doubt it. Chris
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.