Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 18 October 2006 16:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Lewis That got your attention. Right, "a friend" has found that the Fire detection system in his factory has been turned off since 08.00 this morning so that dust created by contractors does not trip the alarms and "cause inconvenience for the staff". We are talking SYSTEM here not just sounders; automatic detection, call points everything powered down!!!!!! My friend has a stack of stuff already relating to Fire Reform Act, failing to provide a safe system of work, Insurance null and void etc. can you guys add any other useful bits; in particular evidence of people going to jail for such offences.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 18 October 2006 17:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By sagalout John, you haven't told us what arrangements have been made to cover this temporary change, how long not available, the detail of the undertaking, numbers of people, types of risk and so on and so on. How can we possibly comment on such a generalised description? Such situations require careful and competent assessment that are not possible on a forum. It would be wrong to assume from the scant details provided that it is automatically wrong or unsafe. If it is the action of one or more individuals who have not properly assessed the safety critical decision to switch off protective systems, then that is the issue, either the lack of control procedures for this type of safety critical decision or non-compliance to any existing procedures, nothing directly to do with the Fire Regs.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 18 October 2006 18:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman 1. If you are the H&S person then you SHOULD have been involved in the decision loop. I don't say that it would have been YOUR decision. But you should have been asked for your advice. Then SENIOR management would have decided what to do. (sorry about the caps but I feel very strongly about this !!!!) 2. It can (does) happen that systems have to be taken down for maintenance or repair. That's life (Esther Ranzen circa 1932) Preferably before, but at least when, you must inform your insurers and ask their advice. 3. The real question is "what happens if it all goes so horribly, horribly wrong ?" I have often asked the local fire station if they could park a pumper with crew on our premises for an hour or two. They were usually happy to oblige (it's a boring life unless you need to put your life at risk) They come with the proviso that if something goes pear shaped elsewhere then they gotago. Fine. You plug that into your planning. Free tea/coffee, free lunch (as much as you can eat and by eck can they eat !) guided tour around the plant and tea and biscuits with the plant manager. And a donation to the widows and orphans. The last was £100. But when we reallyreally need them I know they will be here. The only time we really called them was when someone smelt burning in one of the corridors. Smell was confirmed but source was not traced. So we called them. They came and found a fag end smouldering in a plant pot. Laughs and coffee all round. I paid. Merv
Admin  
#4 Posted : 18 October 2006 21:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever John, as sagalout pointed out there are some unanswered questions before we all go jumping in feet first. It may surprise many that fire detection systems are often installed in buldings where they are not really required, they are just an added nicety. Does the fire risk assessment specify that a detection system is required? It may be that the system is a property protection system which is primarily intended to summon the fire brigade rather than a life safety system which is intended to warn the occupants of the building. Although fire certificates are no longer required it is worth looking at your old certificate (assuming you had one) and seeing if a detection system was specified on that. If it was then the chances are that it was for a life safety system. Assuming the circumstances have not altered significantly then the system is probably still required but this should be flagged up in the fire risk assessment and accompanying fire strategy.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 19 October 2006 00:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ken Taylor With a decent modern system, you could just 'turn off' detection in the zone in which the contractors are working - and then have a temporary alternative measure (such as a person present to activate a nearby call-point). The age-old remedy for dusty contractors was plastic bags over the detectors.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 19 October 2006 08:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By gham Some systems can be set to optical and or heat, investigate this. Also we use detector covers, be it off the shelf or a rubber glove both do the job, be sure to remove any settled dust by damping down and wiping the cover before you remove them of it will defeat the purpose. You can get the covers from your manufacture... or use the glove in the first aid kit
Admin  
#7 Posted : 19 October 2006 10:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ashley Wood If the alarm system has been switched off i.e power off and batteries disconnected and no other arrangements made to safeguard the work force i.e fire watchers, air horns etc, then this building represents a life hazard. It would be a foolish person who did this without putting into place some temporary arrangements. Could the work not have been done at a time when the building manning levels are reduced i.e weekends or evenings? Even then, measures must be taken to protect the workers and contractors. It is normal to provide a person to watch over the contractors i.e fire watcher, wardens to walk the building and alternative ways to sound the alarm i.e air horns.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 20 October 2006 10:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Lewis Guys. Thanks all for your responses, I was away yesterday so didn't get to see them then. I can confirm that there were no emergency arrangements put in place and I was not consulted before the switch off. Despite my demands the alarm system was not re-instated until 17.15, an hour and a quarter after the individual who disconnected it went home(!) and nine and a quarter hours after they were turned off. Our Managing Director is aware of it and I have raised a Corrective Action under our quality system. A meeting is arranged for later today to discuss the enormity of the issue and to arrange a formal procedure to cover works of this type. Once again, thanks for your comments.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.