Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 26 October 2006 13:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John D Crosby A colleague has asked for information about whether or not an employee who has different jobs, could be off sick from one employer as the result of stress but still work for the second employer. She is sure she has seen a decision by either a court or a tribunal that suggests that this may be true. Can anyone help with information about the case if it did actually occur. John C
Admin  
#2 Posted : 27 October 2006 16:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shirley I have just added a section in our Staff Handbook to state the following..... Working / Active Sports Whilst On Sick Leave It is believed that it is standard reasonable practice and behaviour that an employee, if absent from work because of sickness, should not carry out any form of work or play active sport. The Company explicitly forbids this behaviour - it is assumed that if an employee is fit enough to do so, then an employee should be working – and deems it as totally unreasonable. Where claiming SSP and Company sick pay and working in paid employment this would also be deemed as dishonest. The only deviation is where prior permission is sought and there is a GP report to support it as a form of therapy which could help a person back to their normal employment faster. Hope this is of some use.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 27 October 2006 16:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel I believe that there was a ruling aropund the area - vague about the wording and specific detail - get further specialist advice company rules/procedures are not worth much in some cases as it can be that very rule etc that is contributing etc
Admin  
#4 Posted : 27 October 2006 16:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve Cartwright This one is a HR issue.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 27 October 2006 17:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman Come on, what is an "active sport" ? Maybe a quite game of tennis as recommended by my physio, going for a walk, canoeing on the lake ? or are we talking full out Australian rules football ? Ballroom dancing is now "defined" as a sport so if I go waltzing with the missus on Saturday night I'm gonna get done ? You may be right that such behaviour could be dodgy but I would be very careful about getting medical advice on the employee's fitness for work or for the sport Merv
Admin  
#6 Posted : 27 October 2006 17:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GeoffB4 Shirley - a Friday joke yes?
Admin  
#7 Posted : 28 October 2006 02:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By B Smart Sorry but I wouldn't work for a Company that has such a draconian attitude towards me if I should be off for a stress related illness. Shirley have you consulted with your employees trade union representatives regarding the change to their terms and conditions of employment. I doubt any reasonable person could be in agreement to a Company having a say on what you do or don't do in you rehabilitation time. this smack of HR conkers bonkers B. Smart
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.