Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 27 October 2006 09:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By The toecap Would you say that HSG 65 is a heath and safety management system that is used by companies or is this as it suggests just guidance notes? What do you chaps and chapesses think?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 27 October 2006 09:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Hi Toecap, It is guidance but it is definitely a H&S management system. I have been trained by RoSPA to use their QSA H&S Audit tool; this is based on HSG65 as a management system, though more recent versions also incorporate elements of OHSAS 18000 and ISO 14000 (I know that's the environment, but there you go). Managing Safely and NEBOSH also regard HSG65 as a management system. Finally, it is the standard against which HSE will measure your internal H&S management if you are subject to investigation. For all these reasons it is a management system, John
Admin  
#3 Posted : 27 October 2006 09:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AJM HSG 65 was also very much integral of my NVQ 4 too in fact you have to do a PowerPoint presentation on it at the end of the course. I was also told its still something the HSE bases as its benchmark when visiting companies. Alan
Admin  
#4 Posted : 27 October 2006 09:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve Sanders I think it's guidance on a model for a safety management system. I don't think its a very good model, as it requires the safety organisation to be in place prior to planning how or what it is trying to achieve. That said, a lot of organisations have used it quite successfully. Steve
Admin  
#5 Posted : 27 October 2006 10:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Steve, All published management systems are models. Not sure what you mean about it having to be in place before you can plan for its implementation; I have used it succesfully as a top down device for building management systems, John
Admin  
#6 Posted : 27 October 2006 11:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By The toecap Thanks guys, some very interesting thoughts. I was of the opinion that it wasn't quite a management system but, having read through some thought stimulating material, perhaps i've changed my mind.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 27 October 2006 11:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Catman Could you hand it to a general manager and say 'off you go, theres your management system'? On the other hand, could you use it along with the specific system to explain the concept to them? Its not a complete system but its as complete a model as I have ever used.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 27 October 2006 12:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve Sanders John, The HSG 65 model requires an organisation to develop a safety policy, then organise by putting a management structure and arrangements in place to fulfil that policy, then plan how it will fulfil the policy. Surely the correct approach is Policy, Plan, Organise? Develop policy, plan how it is to be fulfilled, then put in place structure and arrangements to fulfil the plan? Steve
Admin  
#9 Posted : 27 October 2006 12:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Well, no, I don't think there is a 'correct' approach. I can see that the way you describe will work, but the HSG65 approach works just as well. Develop a policy, decide how the work and resources required will be allocated, and then plan and implement... The point with models &c, as I'm sure you will agree, is that they approximate the real world, there cannot be any model which is 'accurate', only models which are more or less useful in given circumstances, John
Admin  
#10 Posted : 27 October 2006 13:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve Sanders Logical may have been a better work than correct. The point of any business system model is to provide a template – a road map – allowing the creation of a workable system. I think there can be accurate models that can be applied to real world situations. My point is that to create the system you must decide what you are trying to achieve (policy), identify what has to be done to achieve it (plan), then you can put a structure and arrangement in place for its archival(organise). HSG 65 requires you to decide what you are trying to achieve (policy), put a structure and arrangement for its achievement in place (organise), the identify what has to be done to achieve it (plan). I think the cart is before the horse with HSG 65. I'm not saying that it is of no use just that there are better models. Steve
Admin  
#11 Posted : 27 October 2006 13:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Vernon Kay Twenty-one health and safety officers had to be rescued by firefighters after an office floor collapsed during a safety meeting in Manchester yesterday. It is not known if any will claim on health and safety grounds.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 27 October 2006 14:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Vernon, I agree entirely; bigendians v littlendians, John
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.