Rank: Guest
|
Posted By The toecap
Would you say that HSG 65 is a heath and safety management system that is used by companies or is this as it suggests just guidance notes?
What do you chaps and chapesses think?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By J Knight
Hi Toecap,
It is guidance but it is definitely a H&S management system. I have been trained by RoSPA to use their QSA H&S Audit tool; this is based on HSG65 as a management system, though more recent versions also incorporate elements of OHSAS 18000 and ISO 14000 (I know that's the environment, but there you go). Managing Safely and NEBOSH also regard HSG65 as a management system. Finally, it is the standard against which HSE will measure your internal H&S management if you are subject to investigation. For all these reasons it is a management system,
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By AJM
HSG 65 was also very much integral of my NVQ 4 too in fact you have to do a PowerPoint presentation on it at the end of the course. I was also told its still something the HSE bases as its benchmark when visiting companies.
Alan
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Steve Sanders
I think it's guidance on a model for a safety management system.
I don't think its a very good model, as it requires the safety organisation to be in place prior to planning how or what it is trying to achieve. That said, a lot of organisations have used it quite successfully.
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By J Knight
Steve,
All published management systems are models. Not sure what you mean about it having to be in place before you can plan for its implementation; I have used it succesfully as a top down device for building management systems,
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By The toecap
Thanks guys, some very interesting thoughts. I was of the opinion that it wasn't quite a management system but, having read through some thought stimulating material, perhaps i've changed my mind.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Catman
Could you hand it to a general manager and say 'off you go, theres your management system'?
On the other hand, could you use it along with the specific system to explain the concept to them?
Its not a complete system but its as complete a model as I have ever used.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Steve Sanders
John,
The HSG 65 model requires an organisation to develop a safety policy, then organise by putting a management structure and arrangements in place to fulfil that policy, then plan how it will fulfil the policy.
Surely the correct approach is Policy, Plan, Organise? Develop policy, plan how it is to be fulfilled, then put in place structure and arrangements to fulfil the plan?
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By J Knight
Well, no, I don't think there is a 'correct' approach. I can see that the way you describe will work, but the HSG65 approach works just as well. Develop a policy, decide how the work and resources required will be allocated, and then plan and implement... The point with models &c, as I'm sure you will agree, is that they approximate the real world, there cannot be any model which is 'accurate', only models which are more or less useful in given circumstances,
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Steve Sanders
Logical may have been a better work than correct. The point of any business system model is to provide a template – a road map – allowing the creation of a workable system. I think there can be accurate models that can be applied to real world situations.
My point is that to create the system you must decide what you are trying to achieve (policy), identify what has to be done to achieve it (plan), then you can put a structure and arrangement in place for its archival(organise).
HSG 65 requires you to decide what you are trying to achieve (policy), put a structure and arrangement for its achievement in place (organise), the identify what has to be done to achieve it (plan).
I think the cart is before the horse with HSG 65. I'm not saying that it is of no use just that there are better models.
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Vernon Kay
Twenty-one health and safety officers had to be rescued by firefighters after an office floor collapsed during a safety meeting in Manchester yesterday.
It is not known if any will claim on health and safety grounds.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By J Knight
Vernon,
I agree entirely; bigendians v littlendians,
John
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.