Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 30 October 2006 09:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MT Has anyone come across a type of gloves which hairdressers are happy to use for shampooing? Most seem happy to wear vinyl or latex gloves (Yes, I'm aware of latex sensitisation) for colouring and perming, but most find it impractical to use them for shampooing as the gloves tend to catch the client's hair and pull it, hurting them.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 30 October 2006 10:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham Marigold have a glove specifically for hairdressers, called the PROTECH. The average vinyl glove is useless against many of the common chemicals found in hair dyes etc. Latex is slightly better, but again does not offer long term protection. (Incidentally, so long as you use unpowedered, low protein latex the risk of sensitisation is miniscule and can be ignored.) It does tend to catch in the hair, as you say. The PROTECH gloves has a special formulation to give better protection against shampoos, hairdyes etc. and has a textured surface so that it does not catch in the hair. However, even the PROTECH will not provide protection against some of the chemicals, such as nail polish remover. With the normal nail polish removers (i.e. the ones that contain acetone) permeation breakthrough is very quick. I use these gloves with the Permea-Tec pad to demonstrate permeation in my courses. The breakthrough occurs in less than 10 seconds! Hope this is of some help. Chris
Admin  
#3 Posted : 30 October 2006 10:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ali Gloves like any other PPE is very personal and what one member of staff likes another will not. Unpowdered latex gloves are useful, but you could also try nitrile gloves which are free of sensitisation and are relatively cheap - many hospitals use them these days, so they need to be cost effective !
Admin  
#4 Posted : 30 October 2006 11:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham With respect to the last posting, personal preference should never be allowed to override correct selection and use. I frequently see gloves being used that are totally unsuitable for the particular operation, although neither employer nor employee are aware of this. Often this occurs where choice of glove type is left to the individual, who simply does not possess the knowledge or training to choose an appropriate glove or to use it within its performance limits. Also, nitrile gloves are not free of sensitisation. In fact, not only is allergic contact dermatitis to the chemicals used in nitrile glove manufacture not uncommon, but there has also been at least one report of a type I, contact urticarial, reaction to a nitrile glove. Chris
Admin  
#5 Posted : 30 October 2006 12:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Pope I am not sure how you get hold of this guy but I recently listened to Bob Rajan of HSE Disease reduction Programme. He is passionate about this subject. He recommends 300m long all round smooth vinyl powder free gloves. He suggests that for shampooing the wearer turns back the cuff to create a "gutter" that stops water running onto the arm and thence inside the glove. The glove must be a good fit and the hairdresser must be well trained in why they must wear gloves. Bob is an occ hygienist not a hairdresser !
Admin  
#6 Posted : 30 October 2006 12:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Pope Sorry I forgot to mention that snagging problems might be caused by very small pimples on gloves designed for lab use - they assist grip of glass test tubes etc - they are no good for hairdressing.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 30 October 2006 12:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham I know Bob Rajan well, although I do not always agree with him. I would not recommend a vinyl glove for hairdressers as my experience is that (a) they tear easily, (b) they do not fit well and, most importantly, (c) many commonly used hairdressing chemicals will quickly permeate a vinyl glove. I do agree with him on turning back the cuff and on having a glove that is long enough. You will also need to traing the workers to take them off properly. When we run training on this it is common to find a considerable number of people who, when they remove their gloves, manage to contaminate their hands with the chemicals against which the glove has (hopefully) been protecting them. This somewhat negates the benefit of the gloves! If anyone needs to contact Bob Rajan (HSE) I can let them have his e-mail address. Chris
Admin  
#8 Posted : 30 October 2006 13:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Diane Thomason MT's original question was about gloves for shampooing - he/she says they already have gloves for perming and colouring. Do hairdressers really need to wear gloves for shampooing? I realise that having the hands in water for a long period each day is not good, but could they not deal with this by restricting each person to doing no more than x shampoos a day, and making sure hands are rinsed and dried after each one? I'm not convinced (yet) that gloves are needed just for shampooing. Would be interested to hear the reasons that RA concludes gloves are needed not just the other measures.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 30 October 2006 14:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham As someone concerned specifically with the prevention of damage to health from workplace skin exposure I would always recommend gloves when shampooing. The problem is not that you immediately see the damage but that the cumulative effect of repeated exposures to this and other chemicals can eventually result in irritant contact dermatitis. In my experience there will not be sufficient numbers of people in the average hairdressing salon for job rotation to be a practical solution, particularly given the frequency with which shampooing will be required. In the Netherlands I understand from a colleague there that wearing gloves when shampooing is a legal requirement. Chris
Admin  
#10 Posted : 30 October 2006 14:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Vernon Kay Can't clients just wash their own hair before they come to the hairdressers? Takes all the problems away.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 30 October 2006 14:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MT The reason I ask is that the occupational dermatitis part of the DRP recommends the wearing of gloves for shampooing as well as for use of colourings and perming lotions as job rotation is not considered to be a suitable control when dealing with wet work. However, none of the hairdressers I have talked to seem to have been able to find a glove that protects the wearer yet isn't an inconvenience for the wearer or the client when shampooing. Thanks Melanie
Admin  
#12 Posted : 30 October 2006 15:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham Melanie Try this website: http://www.marigoldindustrial.com/GB/index.html Chris
Admin  
#13 Posted : 30 October 2006 15:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham Melanie Apologies. Go to that website, then you will need to click on "Laboratory" and "Pro-Tech" to get to the information on the glove you want. Chris
Admin  
#14 Posted : 30 October 2006 15:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Diane Thomason Melanie and Chris Thanks for explaining - I hadn't realised there is a definite causal between this and ICD. regards Diane
Admin  
#15 Posted : 31 October 2006 10:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ali Check out HSG 193 "COSHH Essentials" - there is a section on Hairdressing, which you may find useful. It also states that single use nitrile gloves are acceptable - probably more so than latex gloves.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 15 November 2006 14:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tim Cowell My wife and I own a hairdressing salon and one of our Juniors has recently been diagnosed with dermatitis. Like everyone else in the salon she has always worn gloves when mixing and applying tints but only since the start of her dermatitis problem has she worn gloves for shampooing. And therein lies a problem. The gloves themselves seem to be causing more irritation still. She is using moisturiser after every shampoo and also a prescribed lotion at night, but we now believe that the talc in the gloves that she is using may be a cause of redness of her hands. I think everyone should be made aware of this potential problem that has only been eluded to earlier in this forum and others. It's only because we have experienced this and that we care, as well as being legally liable, that I have been surfing the net for the past few days. Talum powder is listed as one of the causes of dermatitis. The talc is only in the gloves to make it easier to get them off, so from now on she'll be using gloves without talc. But where to get the right ones is the subject of this forum, and I'm not sure that's been answered. The Pro-Tech gloves from Marigold are powder-free but latex and there seems to be some doubt as to whether or not latex can be a contributory factor to dermatitis. But I'm going to order some and give them a try if I can't locate anything that sounds better. That seems to be the only way. Good luck to everyone in this minefield. Tim
Admin  
#17 Posted : 15 November 2006 14:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham Tim Please give me a call (01386 832 311) and I can help you. The selection and use of gloves is far more complex than many realise. From your e-mail I can see already some of the reasons why you are having problems. Incidentally, gloves normally do not use talc as a powder, since it causes skin problems. The powder nowadays is almost always epochlorhydrin cross-linked corn starch. This is an irritant, but not a sensitiser. However, as an irritant it can cause problems, particularly when combined with the hyperhydrating effects of wearing gloves. Most skin reactions to occlusive gloves are not allergies but an irritant reaction. In Germany, wearing gloves for long periods is considered equivalent to wet work and a major cause of occupational irritant contact dermatitis. There are answers to this, which I will be happy to discuss with you. Regards Chris
Admin  
#18 Posted : 15 November 2006 16:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tim Cowell Thanks for the chat Chris. A few thousand other hairdresser owners/managers need to hear what you told me which reinforced what you said above. The young lady I referred to as suffering from dermatitis had said, "they'd have to kill me before I give up hairdressing and even then it won't be easy to make me stop"! Hopefully now with the help of Marigold's Pro-Tech gloves and your advice on the use of moisturisers it won't come to that! Cheers Tim
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.