IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
British (Health and Safety) is best, isn't it?
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Manny
No further comment required.
Discuss
Manny
Somewhere in Europe
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Phillipe
When compared to what, our European friends?
It is only best when it is taken notice of. If people ignore what we as professionals are trying to do then it is no better than any other country.
I would suggest that our "British Authorities" on the whole have a good record of enforcement, certainly in my experience anyway.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
i feel that most of the original European countries are trying to improve H&S and we are all working within the same framework though maybe at different speeds.
Best ? why not try comparing the results ?
Except that you can't. All EU countries except the UK measure statistics on 1-day lost times per million working hours. How do you compare that to the UK ?
Everywhere I go I find the same picture : large and/or high risk companies put lots of resources into H&S. Smaller companies do their best and hope. Cowboys kill.
Doesn't matter what country you are in
And sometimes the very large companies put so much emphasis on cost saving that they too start to kill people. In a very large way.
Merv
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Manny
Thanks for the comments so far. The reason that I started the thread was following comments made in recent topics which put the UK on a pedestal.
I believe that there are good and bad companies in all parts of the EU and that we should sometimes look on our own doorstep before we start criticising other countries.
Manny
not UK
No UK Post Nominals
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48
Manny,
No it is most definitely not. As Merv says, professionally driven safety in most first world countries is, at least, on a par and in some cases better than our current performance. If we allow ourselves to think for one moment that we are the best then we will continue to injure and kill people with tragic consistency.
We often hear the myth that we comply where others don't, strange then that my international colleagues often voice concerns about lack of compliance in the UK and amongst UK companies that they deal with?
The recent speculation about the accident in Greece is typical. How many of those commenting have any idea of the regulatory provisions in Greece let alone any knowledge of facts on which to base any opinion?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richie
Manny,
This was covered on my PgD course, in some depth. It seems that if you were to look at a map of europe, it holds pretty true that the further north you go the better the safety standards and culture. Hence Greece, Italy and Spain pretty much at the bottom of the heap, with Denmark and Norway etc. at the top of the heap. It also holds true, by the way, that higher standards of formal education are encountered the further north you tread, on average.
I do realise that direct statistical comparison is hard, however this is the view of the academics, and many, many hours of research from a wide variety of viewpoints have formed this (albeit simplistically stated) conclusion.
So, in answer toy your hypothesis that "British (Health and Safety) is best": No, not really. The Scandanavians have it in the bag.
Richie.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jim Walker
At the rate that HSE inspections are being run down, it will not be long before we are down there with the dregs.
On the bright side, extrapolating Richie's hypothesis the weather might improve proportionally.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
Um. It's a bit odd, I agree that the further north you go the better the standards become.
However, the further north you go the worse the statistics become. And sorry, but I can't source those stats right now. Well, I know the source (French INRS a couple of years ago) but I no longer have the document.
Thinking is that there may be influences from a) the better welfare provisions up north and b) the more macho Latin culture.
Merv
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jonathan Breeze
Merv,
Can't help but think whale meat might be involved somewhere too!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Stupendous Man
Jonathan,
Catching or eating?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48
Guys,
the other thing we need to remember is that the use of accident statistics is a simple measure that may give a false view.
Two examples
I always remember going to an international H&S conference (one company with many areas of work)many years ago where stats were compared and one part of Africa had 3 fatalities compared to most of the rest of us who were glowing in our accident free, low incidence environment. That is until the chap from this part of the world stood up and outlined the subtle differences between a facility in SE England or Germany or USA and the African Bush! (2 were road deaths related to a mixture of poor road conditions and the things you can meet on a road at night in Africa, the third was a murder at a remote facility.)
The second is more recent where I worked with a French owned company who had a completely different definition and understanding of how to determine whether an accident was a Lost Time Accident(driven I think by French Social Security, Merv?). This caused major issues in the UK based companies, we all knew what a LTA was, except we didn't!
This stuff is most important when comparing data across countries to ensure the criteria are clear otherwise you can draw conclusions that are not as valid as you may think.
p.s. not suggesting in any way that the study mentioned above has no validity, just observing the importance of context when comparing what may not be as "like for like" as you think.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
Right. Like for like is virtually impossible.
In France the employer is automatically responsible for anything bad happening to an employee "during and related to work" this can even cover heart attacks. (but not necessarily pregnancy)
Even accidents occurring on the journey from home to the office are "assimilated" into accident coverage.
Risk assessments are required to be updated annually. It is not a stated requirement that everything different an employee does will be risk assessed beforehand. (though you have to do it for contractors)
Here, I would not, for example, expect to risk assess the action of two employees shifting a desk from here to there. But I would do it for furniture movers.
Once a task is risk assessed the employer is deemed to be aware of any risks identified. Should an injury occur due to an identified risk then the employer is hit with an "inexcusable fault" and it does not matter what action has been taken to alleviate the risk. It is strictly a matter of results. None of that "reasonable" stuff.
In another example, in Holland should PPE be deemed necessary then the employer MUST ensure that it is worn. But the employee can refuse to wear it. (liberty of the individual)
Should any injury occur because of non-use of PPE then it is the EMPLOYER'S fault.
In Germany, any safety initiative must be submitted to the works committee. Who can totally block it. "Safety glasses ? Nein."
There are other examples of cultural differences. Did I tell you about the company in Barcelona which provides a 10 gallon barrel of wine in the workshop ? Thirsty ? have a drink. (a bit rough for my taste. But then ...)
So, you takes your culture and you pays your money.
1-day lost time injury rates in France average 30 per 600 man years (1 000 000 working hours) which is equivalent to 6 on the OSHA scale. How does that compare to the UK rate ?
Damned if I know
Merv
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Stuart Nagle
Personally I think it's all a matter of 'Britshness'... Playing by the rules 'ol-boy' and all that stuff.
You can bet on one thing... If there is rule the Britsh will apply it, usually to the hilt, and if not beyond it...
So when it comes to H&S generally, those that do, do 'so far as is reasonably practicable' (oops that phrase the the EU lot don't like).
My experiences of Europe and further afield... well, again a personal view... No (or very little) enforcement means the poacher is king... Rules...what rules...oh those rules...
PS: some examples...
- best scaffolding I've seen was in Rome (last week)
- Worst...In Spain almost any time...
- Worst highways safety...last night in Kent (excavation on narrow road unlit and road cones - with wide foot - actually stood across the trench... I would say about 800mm from the nearside wheel track...
- Best highways safety... Germany on a main road... It was closed by Police whilst a dead dog was retrived from the carriageway...
I could go on..... Boring...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert Tailby
I don't think so, but mainly because we are so far behind on occ health and rehab/return to work as compared to the Nordic/Scandinavians and Australasians - that's the impression I get anyway.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By jackw.
Compare fire safety with USA and Canada for example. They have wide spread use of sprinkler systems in domestic property = much safer in a fire = better H&S !!!
Cheers
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Davelfc
My belief is there is better practice in some countries than others, some are ahead of the game on work at height and others with Occupational Health.
No one country can claim to be streets ahead of another while accidents continue to happen
Same with companies they may have really good policy and procedures second to none. They may have problems with communication, or inspection and monitoring, behaviour, supervision, attitude of someone in the management chain, ignorance.
Flip side
You may have a company with poor policies but good experienced management who care. and really it does not matter what country you are from or in. Its about regime, understanding and all the other links in the chain. break a link the chain snaps.
That said I have heard though the Scandinavians are very good?
Dave
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
British (Health and Safety) is best, isn't it?
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.