Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Squirrel
I have recently been approached by an employee who wanted to express his concerns about certain 'short cuts' being taken in his department, putting not only his own, but his colleagues health at risk. These short cuts appear to be as a result of managements drive to achieve targets/high profits etc.
Cutting a long story short, it is essential that the use of certain substances on our sites are only used in designated, ventilated rooms. However, it has been alleged that the use of such substances has become common place on the 'shop floor'. Specific PPE is required - which is only issued to those with the authority to handle/use the substances, meaning that all other employees on the shop floor are being exposed, and are completely unprotected.
As of yet, i have not managed to be on site whilst these unsafe practices are being carried out. So, to tackle site management about it would mean i admit to someone having informed me of the problem (admitting to there being a 'snitch' on site).
For employees to feel that they are not able to approach me confidentially with their concerns would be unacceptable, so i need to find a way of dealing with the matter without raising managements suspicion as to the source of my information.
I'm usually a 'go in there with guns blazing' sort of a person, but in this case i don't think it would be the right thing to do.
If anyone has any advice on how to deal with this, let me know.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By J Knight
Hi Squirrel,
I had a similar problem a few years ago; what I did was 'purely by coincidence' issue fresh general instructions about what I had been told was going on, and visited the sites where I had heard there was a problem. I was able to get my evidence all by myself without anybody knowing that I had had a tip-off,
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By DavidW
Squirrel
I've also had this problem and took the same approach as J Knight above. I was also able to have a quiet "unofficial" word with a couple of trusted managers who then were able to act as eyes and ears and help stamp out the problem.
DW
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
I agree. You have to "accidentally" and publicly detect the problem yourself.
Why not chat with some of the workers asking them how to do a particular job for which the particular chemical be be of great help ?
Merv
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Squirrel
J Knight and DavidW - thanks for the advice.
Will certainly give your suggestions a go.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Fred Pratley
If this chemical (interested to know what it is) poses such signifcant risk, do you not a stock record that would guide you towards "illegal" users?
If not, use all guns to ensure only those who should have it are made to account for it.
Fred
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Squirrel
Chemicals concerned are paints /products used in the vehicle repair industry (re-spraying of vehicles).
Health effects include:
Respiratory system irritation
adverse effects on kidneys, liver, central nervous system
May lead to permanent respiratory disability
etc.
Ingredients include ISOCYANATES.
With health and safety being a very new department in the company - although progress is being made, not all systems are up and running.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48
Squirrel,
your info seems to suggest that there is a risk assessment or work procedure in place that you now know is not being followed? Whoah, a penny for every time eh?
However, you can always use that as a way in. I am sure that the HSE MVR site will have something about isocyanates and/or paint spraying that is recent and relevant. You could use that to prompt a review of current practice that might just include a visit to this location?
That way it would be you that "discovers" the issue as part of your review and gives you a process for raising it in a positive way rather than all guns blazing. You know the sort of approach that says things can change over time, chance to confirm that we all still understand the importance of the risk controls and identify any change of work method or emphasis in the risk controls. It might also have the effect of getting managers to check what they should be doing before you arrive and stop any poor practice that has crept in. (maybe not but it does happen)
I would counsel you to go into the review with an open mind, when you find differences ask why they are there and not assume that it is for the reasons that the employee has given you. There may be some real practical difficulties in complying with the procedure that needs your help to resolve.
I guess I am talking about a stewardship role giving managers feedback on their level of compliance; not an inspection role where you just tell them they are getting it wrong and fix it.
Obviously, wherever you find significant non compliance to codes you will need to get agreement on actions.
Remember the manager may have dug this hole whilst trying to get out of another more pressing hole. You need to give him a ladder, not hit him over the head with the shovel he used to dig the first hole.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Raymond Rapp
Just play the Devil's advocate, suppose you do a discreet site visit and do not find anything wrong? Where do you go from there? What is wrong with discussing the matter with a responsible manager in the first place? I often use the phrase 'it has been brought to my attention' and in truth that is not always the case, but it does convey a certain amount of insider information and not to be denied. Assuming it is a fairly large site, the person (snitch) has not been identified and it was only right and proper he did raise the matter anyway. True or not.
Trust may be an underestimated intrinsic value, but it is a sad and dangerous world without it.
Regards
Ray
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Exdeeps
Ahoy there,
If I may play Devils' Advocaat for a moment, is the complainant trying to cause trouble perhaps? Whilst trying to put some bones on the complaint I would also be looking for evidence of malicious intent on the part of the complainant,
Just a thought,
Jim
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Wilson
Not a skimmer then?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kieran J Duignan
Squirrel
The 'riddle' reflects questions about the real culture of your organisation.
Senior managers in some cultures operate and honour the principle whereby a trusted competent professional in your role (or a consultant)can receive and use information from employees without disclosing their sources. The board operates on the basis that senior managers act intelligently and accountably on this basis with the result that strong bonds of integrity safeguard everyone, especially when the organisation is under commercial pressure.
You may be able to check with a couple of senior managers whether you function in a 'high trust' organisation of this kind. To the extent that you do, you can deal with the challenge you outline with directness and speed.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Squirrel
In all honesty, i work for a company that seems to put profit before the health, safety and welfare of it's employees - the existing health and safety culture is at rock bottom.
This may be one brick wall i can't knock down, one mountain i wont be able to climb....
Ohhhhhhhh - how i long for more experience.
Thanks for all the advice.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Darren J Fraser
Have you considered carrying out an audit of various SSOW's including the aforementioned issue and involving all employees at all levels in the areas concerned. Part of the audit could include the following, What is to stop someone from operating outside the specified working area ? and see what response you get.
This way you are not singling out any one area
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Lilian McCartney
Try pretending that you've heard this raised somewhere else (another employers) and that you were wondeirng if you could have a look at what they did on your site to see how much better your site was doing than the other fictious people.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Squirrel
All good suggestions - i appreciate your responses.
Taking your advice on board, this afternoon will be a site visit. The COSHH assessments need reviewing, so this should be the perfect opportunity to observe, ask questions, poke about etc.
Sad to say that, as of yet there are no SSofW on site etc. As i mentioned earlier, health and safety is very new to the company. A further point to make is that it is a fairly large company, spread over 17 sites across the country, with only me in the h&s department.............
If nothing else - its a challenge.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kieran J Duignan
Squirrel
Before, during and after a site visit, do bear in mind an approach that Merv Newman emphasises eloquently: praising whatever safe behaviour is carried out well.
Praise may even improve the social context for discovering difficulties and for discussing them with as much candour as you, and management, can manage.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Squirrel
I will certainly try the 'praising' tactic this afternoon.
Its not that i deliberately go out of my way NOT to praise employees/managers, its more that recently there has been very little evidence of 'good practice' on certain sites to be able to praise them about.
I'm very passionate about my job, and as such the more ways in which i can encourage and inspire employees/managers to work safely etc. the happier i will be each evening as i try and sleep.
So far, many a night i lay awake worrying over 'whats not being done'.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.