Rank: Guest 
|
Posted By Booney
Morning All,
I am attempting to put together a business case to justify training an employee up as an in-house FLT trainer.
Rather than relying on external training providers as we do now, I feel this could prove to be cost effective in the long run.
Is anyone aware of any case law that may help to support my argument please?
Also, your experience/opinions on whether this is considered to be best practice?
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Darren Glen-Egan
Hi could i be cheeky and also have a copy of your analysis Chris as this is a route that my company is considering going down in the near future.
Many thanks
Darren
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Adrian Watson
Boony,
There is no case law that I know of regarding this matter.
An in-house trainer has a number of advantages:
1. (S)he will have intimate knowledge and experience of your equipment, site conditions and operations.
2. (S)he will be able to train people on site without loss of time.
3. (S))he will be able to test and retrain as appropriate; if you do (and you should) carry out post training evaluations at 1, 3, 6 and 12 monthly intervals (and after any near misses and accidents) - you can quickly correct any bad habits before they become institutionalised or lead to an accident.
4. Its cheaper - if you train regularly!
Regards Adrian Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Booney
Chris,
tried to mail you but they are bouncing back!
Adrian,
many thanks for the info, I will use this as a part of the argument
Thanks to all who have taken the time to look
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.