Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jennifer Kelly
Are you an organisation that pays for taxis for staff who work beyond a certain hour even when public transport is still available?
If you are, what made you decide to do this and what is the time that you decided on?
Thank you in advance for your comments.
Jennifer
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By jackw.
Hi, I used to be involved in a local social club and we paid for taxi home for staff after work usually around 12.30 a.m. This was mostly a "perk" and they pay rates aren't great: min wage. I am no longer involved and they stopped, purely on economic grounds (the club is not as busy as it used to be and they are struggling to pay their way,) paying for a taxi for staff. As far as I am aware there is no duty of care to staff when they finish the shift.
Cheers
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By David Bannister
Hi Jennifer, I think this is about the ethos and culture of the organisation and the personal stance of individuals in the employing body. When my wife was working late as a youth worker there was very little thought as to personal safety of the staff leaving during the hours of darkness. She would sometimes be escorted home safely by some of the young people with whom she had worked, on the occasions when she did not drive.
Now, as an employer, she has ensured that late workers have private transport if leaving late. This is however, not a formal system, just one that appears to work and based on perception of risk. In reality I believe that it is more of a labour-relations benefit than true risk management.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jennifer Kelly
Thank you for both for your responses - I tend to agree with both of you about this issue being more about labour relations than risk or duty of care.
I would be interested however to know if anyone disagrees and if so, for what reason?
Regards
Jennifer
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Raymond Rapp
Jennifer
Without specific details for your enquiry it is difficult to know where you are coming from. That said, you need to consider a number of different risk-based factors. For example, what distances are employees travelling, young or in some way vulnerable, does it include Fri/Sat night, will there be drunken revellers about, is the are(s) notorious for crime/mugging etc.
I believe the company have both a moral and legal duty, tenuous perhaps, to consider the well-being of their staff at all times. Therefore, it is good practice to adopt an altruistic approach.
Regards
Ray
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By James Midlake
Do you pick up any extra liability if you select the taxi company and they turn out to be a worse risk than the walk home?
Might be better to let the individual make the taxi arrangements and then ensure they are reimbursed?
Midlake
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jennifer Kelly
Thanks for the answers thus far.
Reason for starting the thread is as follows.
A few weeks ago the charity I work for had a major fundraising event at a central London location on a week night. The event was staffed by a combination of staff who had to be there, staff who volunteered to be there (inlcuding myself) and volunteers who simply volunteered their time for the event.
The event finished at approx 11:30pm and most of us took public transport home as most of us live within walking distance of a train, tube or bus stop.
The next day I was approached by a number of staff from the event expressing their surprise that taxis were not supplied for everyone working or volunteering their time for the event to get back home. Surely I was asked, is this not a health and safey issue? And to be honest I am not sure.
When we were briefed for the event by the event organiser we were all told that we should try to use public transport if we could and those people who lived further out should leave earlier to ensure they did not miss last trains buses etc. The event organiser did say if we found ourselves in a situtation where getting a black cab or licensed mini cab was safer then we should do so and charge back the fare on expenses.
Now I think this is a reasonable approach particluarly considering we are a charity, but some staff, including the Union rep, are not happy. I need to respond to them and wanted to find out what members of the forum thought, particular within the context described, before I do so.
Thanks again Jennifer -
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By S. Peeters
Hello Jennifer,
Since I can't post a response on your subject "Applicability of UK H&S legislation to situations overseas" I do it in this discussion. Sorry for that.
Do you have some results from your research? I'm very interested because I have some similar questions regarding this topic. see subject "Safety and Health management in Africa" on the Study support forum. Hope you can help me out. I leave you my e-mailaddress: stpeeters@hotmail.com
Btw, a couple of years ago I worked for a major bank in Barcelona. When employees did the late shift (work until 10 pm) or the night shift they were offered to take a cab home ( or to any other place in or near Barcelona). Expenses were paid by the company. You have to know that the subways of Barcelona are open until 2 a.m except on sundays (until midnight). And buses drive to the nearsest suburbs during the whole night. There is no need to tell you that everyone took a cab after doing the late shift or night shift. (It's the quickest way to get home, it's safe and it's free). So, I guess the bank gives its employees a combination of safety and service.
Kind Regards,
Stefan
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By GPS
As a social club we used to organise taxis for our staff following later nite functions etc. (around 12.30) Our tax and VAT inspector picked up on this and we were told that this was a staff benefit and tax would need to be paid. This made it to expensive for us and we therefore had to cease the facility.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Raymond Rapp
Jennifer
It is a tricky situation you describe, very often there is not a right or wrong answer. Risk and the perception of risk is largely an individual process. For example, in circumstances where a female might feel vulnerable a man may not.
From the scenario you describe it appears the relevant issues were considered and discussed. If it is not financially viable to provide taxis - job done. The staff have a choice too, they can refuse to work if they believe the risks are unacceptable.
The union rep is doing his/her job, it may be advisable to sit down and discuss the situation, perhaps even give them a 'small win' by agreeing to a taxi for staff finishing later than say midnight or some other possible reason.
Ray
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alexis B
Hi Jennifer
Is the union rep unhappy because the decision about whether or not to get a taxi was being left to the individual or/and was only suggested after the event by the organiser once staff had objected?
My view is that it is a H&S issue.
The event organised outside work ending at 11.30pm introduced additional security risks to those working/volunteering. In the past (Christmas parties etc) I have simply asked in advance how people were planning to return home (particularly if alcohol is involved) whether people could give each other lifts, share taxis etc. If it meant someone couldn't otherwise attend an event there might be an arrangement for a taxi/hotel room whichever is cheaper, or for someone to stay the night with someone else. The final arrangemens may very well have been the same but asking is important; it may be the perceived lack of care that is the issue.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.