Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 12 December 2006 16:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Cook I am experiencing some union resistance to involving staff in carrying out manual handling assessments. I work for the prison service and am responsible for 9 instructors who are in turn responsible for parties of 12 prisoners working in a variety of workshops. In essence they a re fulfilling the role of a shop floor supervisor. Obviously there are a variety of manual handling tasks which need assessing. To invovle the staff in this process a member of staff was provided with appropriate training to allow them to carry out assessments. Union are saying that it should only be management that carry them out as why should a member of staff carry the responsibility associated with the risk assessment. Anyone got any thoughts or advice please.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 12 December 2006 16:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bill Elliott It is the employers responsibility to reduce the risks to health from hazardous manual handling operations. Having identified these, and avoided them wherever possible, where there are operations that can't be avoided then these should be assessed with a view to reducing the risks of injury so far as is reasonably practicable. The assessment process should of course involve those affected by the assessment and any control measures that may result but it is essentially a "management" role.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 12 December 2006 16:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Christopher The management regulations do not require that it is a manager who undertakes assessments. It is sufficient for it to be someone with sufficient knowledge, experience and skills. It makes complete sense for the tasks to be undertaken by those who are undertaken the role. They should be involving everyone who is likely to be involved in the task. The manager may sign them off, but he is only signing that he has read them and that he is satisfied that the person who has written the assessment has the appropriate skills and has involved the relevant parties. Management also sign to say that they accept any risks that have been identified or to assess and determine the level of further resources required. I've been involved in prison work, and it amazes me that prisoners don't sue more. (I don't want to hear about the reasons for them being in prison). Lets focus on health and safety.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 12 December 2006 17:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Nicholls Hi John Firstly . Do your staff carry out training in machine shop laundry etc. If they do then they must surely be carrying out risk assessments already. They assess the competence to operate machines etc. I would contact the union rep to find what the real problem is, especially as you have trained staff to carry out this type of assessment. Of course you will be monitoring the assessments, to ensure they are suitable and sufficient. I would think having the extra responsibility would help not hinder; but then that's my thoughts. Good luck Alan N
Admin  
#5 Posted : 12 December 2006 17:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert Tailby What does the Prison Service H&S Policy say in its "Arrangements" about how risk assessments are to be carried out? My guess is that it will open the door for "shop floor" staff who have been properly trained and are given adequate support to do them, and I for one would encourage their involvement for reasons already stated by others above. If local Union reps are being obstructive, you could try going further up the chain within the Union - in my experience TUs can be very helpful in supporting risk assessment work by their members, and I would have thought the TUC et al would be in harmony with what you want to achieve. You could politely suggest to your local reps that they seek advice from "central office", and my guess is that this will help you resolve the problem - at least I hope so.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 13 December 2006 08:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Cook A big thank you to everyone who responded. All the points raised, in essence agree with my thinking. My main problem is that the union safety rep (I'm a member of the same union) is very new to the role and is being somewhat obstructive and narrow minded in his views. In his opinion everything to do with assessments is for management to carry out and nothing to do with staff, their role finishes at the hazard spotting and goes no further. I believe that this is also the view being pushed by his union lecturer. Intend to go back today and try again. Once again, thanks for the help. John
Admin  
#7 Posted : 14 December 2006 08:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By April Catherine Harvey John,I am the health and safety officer in a prison , if you can e-mail me direct I will fill you in on how we work with the trade union. Thanks April
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.