Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Hasitha Ratnayake Could anybody give me the definitions for a H & S Manager and for a H & S Practitioner please?
Regards,
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By srd I would imagine that the Practitioner advises on health and safety, while the Manager manages a team that advises on health and safety.
Stephen.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bill Parkinson I am a H&S Manager but don't have a team to manage!
The reason I am a "manager" is that I manage some of the systems which are used to determine performance as well as acting as an advisor to other senior managers.
Bill
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim I use the term Safety and Health Practitioner because I am CMIOSH and self employed. I used to, and still do use the term advisor as I advise Clients on health and safety and it is up to them whether they take my advice or not.
I was Health and Safety Manager in my last full time employed role, I did not manage a team but did manage the company's health and safety. When the Company refused to follow my advice I found the need to follow up and be more determined to make them see the need to adhere to the rules and regs. because I was actually employed for that reason.
If a Client fails to follow my advice as an advisor I don't do any further work for them.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48 In every day life, probably nothing except a job title and the examples outlined above. The terms are not mutually exclusive although they can be used to "suggest" different things. In strict terms, these are the commonly quoted definitions used when the difference really does matter.
A Practitioner is someone who practices a learned profession. Chartered Members of IOSH are deemed by IOSH to be Practitioners. "Management" (from Old French ménagement) is the art of conducting, directing (from Latin manu agere "to lead by the hand") and characterises the process of leading and directing all or part of an organisation, often a business, through the deployment and manipulation of resources.
So to confuse the matter even more, I am both a practitioner and a manager in my current role.
Beware semantics!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Raymond Rapp As some have already indicated, a manager is term that distinguishes both rank and accountability or anything in between. In hierarchy terms you could have; Senior Manager, Manager, Senior Advisor and Advisor. Take your pick.
No semantics here...lol
Ray
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ken Taylor 'H&S practitioner' is a generic term for those who practice in the health and safety profession - which includes those who are part of 'management', those who supervise, those who advise, those who enforce, etc and these will have various job-titles (including 'H&S Manager').
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Hasitha Ratnayake hmmm...... gentlemen, I am still confused...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bob Shillabeer Just to add to your confusion; remember a safety practitioner is a person who holds a recognised qualification (By IOSH as Europes leading Safety & Health organisation) whereas a safety manager is someone who manages safety and health on behalf of an organisation (remember the H&S manager may not be qualified but carries the title).
I am a chartered member but when I first became a safety manager I only held the General Certficate. Give me a safety practitioner every time he/she holds more credibility and often has more clout with the Chief Exec.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ken Taylor But what law can prevent someone that is not chartered from calling themselves a health and safety practitioner - particularly if they are in the H&S profession? Can you assume that someone is chartered if they call themselves a H&S practitioner? If they are chartered, they are told by IOSH that they may call themselves a chartered S&H practitioner - so why omit the word 'chartered'? If employers and clients want to find a chartered person they should look for the word 'chartered' and/or the postnominals 'CMIOSH'.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Adrian Watson A safety practitioner is anybody who is a practitioner in safety; you do not need to be qualified, you merely have to be a practitioner.
To be a Chartered Safety and Health Practitioner you have to be meet the criteria set by IOSH. If you call yourself a Chartered Safety and Health Practitioner and your not you're committing a common law offense and can be prosecuted for "passing off".
Regards Adrian Watson
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman Anyone, just anyone, can call themselves a H&S practitioner or manager. There is no legally defined definition or restriction.
My first job title (in this trade) was Risk Management Coordinator. No qualifications or postnominals. But responsible for HSE on a chemical site (right next door to Buncefield and currently still looking a bit bent) I argued to be called a manager but they would not have it.
Later I become head of the HSE department. But that was just me and the nurse. (and a shared secretary. Oh Jocelyne, where art thou now ?)(probably about 50 with 4 kids)(and maybe grandchildren)
There are approximately 30 known titles for H&S people.
Manager/practitioner ? I might put it down to the "hands" policy. If you never go out, squat in front of or under a machine and get your hands dirty then you are a manager.
Hands-on, you are a practitioner.
Today I'm a consultant. But I just love practising.
Merv
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bob Shillabeer There should be no doubt as to what a H&S Practitioner is - it is in my opinion someone whop has the qualification to use the title such as Chartered Health & Safety Practitioner. There should be no less a standard legitemately applied to the role. If it is accepted otherwise there is no future for development of ever increasing competence. Alas poor IOSH I Knew it well. It's hard enough getting some well known people to take health & safety seriously now but if just anyone can be called a practitioner it dilutes the much hard work many people have put in to becoming competent/qualified practitioners. I'm sure IOSH will take a very dim view of anyone simply calling themselves a practitioner. Views please moderators.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48 This thread has developed since my first comment and on reflection I probably responded as if the term chartered practitioner was in the original question. I would like to add further thoughts. I hope they are still on subject? I see the challenge arising from such questions as getting the term “S&H Practitioner” accepted into common usage alongside terms like engineer or accountant or doctor or estate agent or builder or electrician. These words only mean the picture that we get when we hear them; they do not really define competence or expertise. It will not be easy, for a start it is much more difficult to both say and spell than any of those! However, once achieved it will give the proper place for a “chartered ……..” to exist in the public mind.
I agree with the comment that to be a practitioner you must be practising in the subject area, whatever it is and at whatever level. That is ACTIVELY involved at an identifiable level. Also that to be a manager you should be personally responsible for managing some asset(s).
You need qualifications/experience to be recognised by a learned or professional body and to be allowed or registered to use the identified title or descriptions. These standards are regulated by the professional body and, as Adrian pointed out, it is unlawful to use the terms until granted by the professional body to that individual. Thus the term "Chartered S&H Practitioner" is both protected and defined but the term S&H practitioner along with H&S Manager is not.
An employer, or you, can use any job title you wish(exemptions as above) and you may be any, none or all of the above and still be called “the safety bod”. All the law requires is that if you are identified as the competent person, for reg 7 of MHSW Regs, that you “ …have sufficient training and experience or knowledge and other qualities to enable him properly to assist in undertaking the measures referred to….” That could be anything from basic H&S training for simple undertakings up to membership of other recognised professional bodies for specialist or complex undertakings.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Hasitha Ratnayake Well, the second para of Pete's comments bring up an interesting issue. "H & S accepted into common usage terms like engineer...."
I know in many countries H&S is still evolving as a job function. Definitely, it is not accepted as that of an Engineer.... So what shall we do together to reach there??
oops.. should I use a new thread??
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.