Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 25 January 2007 11:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Michael Carr
Our maintanence staff have been tasked to clear out some vaults in the basements of a building. The vaults contain old files, boxes etc and have been in there for some time

the vaults are very mouldy and stink to high heaven.

my question is-are there any significant health issues when exposed to this kind of environment? i.e respiratory problems, eye problems etc

I will be supplying gloves and coveralls and will limit the time they will be working in there.

all manual handling issues have been addressed

any thoughts will be welcome

Admin  
#2 Posted : 25 January 2007 11:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel
some moulds etc are hazardous etc so risk assess [dynamic can be OK]

if you have any doubt at all get an analysis before you start - think about its environmental disposal should the mould be 'unfriendly'

PPE is only good if you know what it has to protect against

Admin  
#3 Posted : 25 January 2007 12:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chas
Is it toxic mould? Dealing with toxic mould has a number of health issues attached. The link below may be of interest (RICS website). The issue of toxic mould is big in the US (almost as big as the asbestos issue), hope this helps.

http://www.rics.org/NR/r...A/0/Toxicmouldreport.pdf
Admin  
#4 Posted : 25 January 2007 13:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By LAB
Michael,

Mould can cause significant health effects depending on the type it is. If this build up is caused by the build up of damp then it is likely to be household mould. As moulds can present respiratory problems, you should be aware of any of your employees who already suffer from problems such as asthma or allergies as they will be more susceptible.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 25 January 2007 13:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Michael Carr
Thanmks all for your advice

Michael
Admin  
#6 Posted : 25 January 2007 14:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Charles Robinson Tech IOSH
The following link to Guidance for Clinicians on the Recognition and Management of Health
Effects Related to Mold Exposure and Moisture
Indoors

http://www.oehc.uchc.edu/clinser/MOLD%20GUIDE.pdf
Admin  
#7 Posted : 25 January 2007 15:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jeff Manion
List of Potential Microbiological Hazards.

Agent. Disease or Infection. Source.
Pencillum spp. Rhinitis, asthma, alveolitus. Building fabric.
Serpula Lacrymans (dry rot). Rhinitis, asthma. Building fabric, old timbers.
Aspergillus spp (especially A.Fumigatus and A.Niger. Rhinitis, asthma. Building fabric, old timbers.
Mucor spp. Rhinitis, asthma. Building fabric, soil.
Cladosporium spp. Rhinitis, asthma. Building fabric.
Clostridium tetani. Tetanus, lockjaw. Soil.
Chlamydia psittaci. Orthinosis. Bird droppings, feather nests.
Histoplasmosa capsulatum Histoplasmosis. Bird and bat droppings.
Leptospira icterohaemorrhagiae. Weil's disease - leptospirosis Mainly rats but also cats, dogs and cattle urine.
Bacillus anthracis Anthrax Spores of leather horse hair or wool products.
Variola major or minor. Smallpox Infected mummified skins.

The routes of entry into the body in which the contamination can enter are limited. If the type of contaminant is known, it will be relatively easy to provide effective barriers and designs systems of work to limit exposure and / or intake of any bio-hazard that has been recognised as being present.

In addition to the three principal routes of entry: -

? Inhalation – breathing in the contaminant
? Ingestion – through eating food or by other means of entering the mouth, splashes / smoking etc.
? Absorption – through the skin.

Exposed mucous membranes (eyes, nose, mouth) and open wounds may transport the bio-hazard into the body that may have otherwise have been kept at bay.
Having identified the possible bio-hazards and their route into the body, the range of measures by which an acceptable degree of protection might be achieved can be considered. With the existing bio-hazards, the primary defences of removal or substitution are not viable. Therefore the less effective protective devices of reducing numbers exposed, reducing duration of exposure, providing ppe and appropriate disrobing, disinfection and decontamination measures become paramount.

Special provisions relating to protection against all biological hazards that might adversely affect people are list below: -

When provisionally classifying a biological agent the employer shall assign that agent to one of the following Groups according to its level of risk of infection and, if in doubt as to which of two alternative Groups is the most appropriate, they shall assign it to the higher of the two;

? Group 1 - unlikely to cause human disease;
? Group 2 - can cause human disease and may be a hazard to employees; it is unlikely to spread to the community and there is usually effective prophylaxis or treatment available;
? Group 3 - can cause severe human disease and may be a serious hazard to employees; it may spread to the community, but there is usually effective prophylaxis or treatment available;
? Group 4 - causes severe human disease and is a serious hazard to employees; it is likely to spread to the community and there is usually no effective prophylaxis or treatment available.
JNM
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.