Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 08 February 2007 10:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Eliot Clarke Please can someone confirm the current situation regarding inspections of the lifting/lowering equipment on vehicle transporters. I have been advised that currently these do not come under LOLER (just PUWER) but that the HSE is drafting proposals for these to require statutory inspections in the near future. Many thanks Eliot
Admin  
#2 Posted : 08 February 2007 16:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alistair Reid Eliot, I am aware that there were various views on this subject and some organisations were hanging on to historic comments made by the HSE to save money but I thjought the HSE had cleared this up a couple of years ago. Car transporters clearly are subject to examination under LOLER. The situation is very simple, if there was an incident could you sensibly argue in a court of law that the raised upper deck of a transporter did not constitute lifting equipment, I think this would be very difficult.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 08 February 2007 17:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Eliot Clarke Alistair Thanks for that. I too had thought that LOLER was applicable until I spoke to an engineering inspection firm that stated otherwise.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 08 February 2007 17:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve Clark Eliot, you may find the HSE Contract Research Report [CRR] 429/2002 an interesting read. It describes various types of lifting equipment including vehicle recovery vehicles, in particular spectacle lifts. Whilst not exactly the same, the principles would apply. Given that the moving bed of a transporter would not normally be used, even inadvertently, for lifting persons then a 12 monthly thorough examination may be required. Steve Clark CMIOSH R&D SG: Chair Transport & Distribution Committee http://www.iosh.co.uk/in...=specialist.news&sgid=13
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.