Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 08 March 2007 12:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By notsothicko Are there any legal restrictions on having authorised crossing points, within the workplace on private roadways arounds the site, black and white (like a Zebra crossing) or can this type only be used on the highway.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 08 March 2007 12:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alan Hoskins So far as possible we try to replicate the highway signs and road markings on a smaller scale. This avoids much cofusion. Remember though that these are not enforcable as they would be on the highway. You need a company policy for enforcement. We use zebra crossing markings complete with zig zags, but no beacons. Alan
Admin  
#3 Posted : 08 March 2007 13:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Hi, Just to add to Alan's post; HSE's guidance on workplace transport actually states that signs and markings in workplaces should be to the same design as those on the public highway, as this helps avoid confusion. This is guidance, and not a requirement, but we for example follow it in all our grounds, John
Admin  
#4 Posted : 08 March 2007 13:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Frank Newman On a private site road markings and signs have no legal significance. They are simply indicative of site management's preferences. However, in the event of an accident they could be accepted as partial mitigation. Merv
Admin  
#5 Posted : 08 March 2007 13:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CFT Agree with the above points; on our own few hundred acres of managed site we try to follow shapes patterns styles etc but like Alan states we have left the beacons out on ZC's but included additional lighting on adjacent lighting columns to assist during poor visibility and night use. We try also SFARP to have a similar temporary signs system when required.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 08 March 2007 16:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jim Walker Any recipes for zebra, merv??
Admin  
#7 Posted : 08 March 2007 16:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs "On a private site road markings and signs have no legal significance." Really Merv? I would suggest to m'lord that: They do if the person driving is an employee. As part of the arrangements to ensure safety (74 Act; Management Regs; and Welfare Regs) they become a safe system of work and Reg 7(b) & 8 of the 74 Act requires an employee to co-operate and not to misuse. The legal significance is not under a Road Traffic Act, or regulation, but under those quoted, I would argue. (politely nods, and leaves for a three week holiday before waiting for a response *grin*).
Admin  
#8 Posted : 08 March 2007 16:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight Hi tabs, Hate to say this but HASAWA and MHSW Regs don't apply to MOPs, and I'm not entirely sure they would (in this context) apply to people not in your employment, John
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.