Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mike White
Could anybody offer a little advice regarding first aid at work. Have just started working for a small company with over 20 personnell and have been informed by management that we do not require first aiders because of our close proximity to a hospital with an A & E dept(approx 2 miles)? They have 4 people who have attended an appointed persons course.The company extrude plastics and convert to sheets and bags and run a 24hr shift pattern. Having looked at the guidance I would have thought that regardless of the buildings proximity to hospitals, the type of work involved would require people who have attended a 4 day first aid at work course. Any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kate Graham
Can you point to any accident records showing there have been cuts, burns, chemical exposure etc? If so that would strengthen the case for first aiders.
Kate
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alan Nicholls
Hi Mike
In previous employment we ran injection moulding
equipment, days only. We had local hospital within 3/4 of a mile and still had first aid personnel. Because the risk was considered high.
Plastic burns tend to be deep and take a long time to heal. You know this but does your management?
Regards Alan N
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MAK
Hi Mike,
you can find additional guidance on this at :
http://www.hse.gov.uk/firstaid/legislation.htm
Basically the regulations (First aid at work regs 1981) apply to all workplaces regardless of their proximity to a A&E department, and require a trained first aider where there are 5 employees or more, nominated people are applicable for where there are less than 5 people.
The guidance at the link above will demonstrate that also an assessment should be undertaken which will address the nature of the activities at the workplace and the possible injuries that could occur, consideration should also be given to general first aid provisions, i.e eye wash, plasters etc.
Be careful of how you present your findings on this to the managment, there will be a cost involved in amending your current system, and we all know how some employers can be extremely resistant to change, when costs are involved.
I am a First Aider and volunteer for the British Red Cross, and if you require training in your area you can access their web at: http://www.redcrossfirstaidtraining.co.uk/
m
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MAK
The regs you need are named "Health and Safety (First-Aid) Regulations 1981". not "first aid at work as Ive noted in the post above.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Andrew Robertson-Böber
It is important to remember that the 1 to 50 equation is a ‘guideline’. What is crucial is that for any company the number and type of first aid personnel would be based on an assessment. In assessing need, employers need to consider:
- workplace hazards and risks;
- the size of the organization;
- the organization’s history of accidents;
- the nature and distribution of the workforce;
- the remoteness of the site from emergency medical services;
- the needs of travelling, remote and lone workers;
- employees working on shared or multi-occupied sites;
- annual leave and other absences of first aiders and appointed persons.
Simply reliance on the proximity of the closest hospital is quite inconsequential to this assessment, albeit entirely feckless, as First-Aid is about the provision to ensure employees receive ‘immediate’ attention when injured or ill at work. For instance, if you are dealing the a severe trauma based injury (such as a severed limb, or crushing) then someone is going to need to stabilize the patient for the emergency services to take over. It would not be deemed acceptable if all you could do is stand over a dying man twiddling your thumbs.
Conversely, it is your assessment which would identify the types and severity of injuries which would occur. The latter point is also equally as important as say you only have 1 first aider to 50 employees then who is providing first aid when that employee is on leave or absent?
It is prob best if you sit down with your managers and have a polite discussion based around this assessment having been undertaken.
Remember, this isn't nearly as fraught as determining expedition medical requirements and training so always count your blessings. I, however, can't.
B
Andrew Böber
PGCert CMIOSH FRSH FRGS
Chartered Safety & Health Practitioner
Health & Safety Manager
Zoological Society of London
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.