Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 12 April 2007 22:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By saira adams If two to three rooms of a domestic dwelling (over 5 employees) is being used as a business (offices) and has not really been amended to incorporate the business, do all the usual requirements still stand, i.e legionnaire testing, fire doors or are the normal front and back doors ok, emergency lighting, fire exit signs, dda access etc.. Thanks Saira
Admin  
#2 Posted : 12 April 2007 23:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rob Randall Hi, if the former domestic premises are now used as offices this constitues a "change of use" in terms of the Building Standards and should have been advised to the Local Authority. The requirement when there is a change of use is that all of the current standards will have to be applied to the premises. So yes, there will be a need for compliance with the DDA, a fire risk assessment should have been done and any necessary alterations should be made. A "general" risk assessment should also have been done and any control measures needed as a result of this should be put in place. In addition to this all of the usual elements of compliance with the HASAW act and the relevant statutory instruments (regulations) should have been looked at and implemented.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 12 April 2007 23:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rob Randall Hi again Saira, what I should also have said in my reply was that I think it depends if the other parts of the premises are still being used as a domestic dwelling. In this case it is a bit more complicated and depends very much on whether it is a family business, i.e. if the employees are members of the family who live in the dwelling. However if employees are non family members then all of the relevant HASAW legislation would apply.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 13 April 2007 11:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By CWCaz Saira, When we had employees working at home, all of the above was carried out and if the premises were not suitable (i.e. unsafe and out of our control) then they were not allowed to work at home...If there was a fire for example and there was only one means of escape and they couldn't get out and that person persihed as a result, we as a company would be liable...it is a complicated one! CCW
Admin  
#5 Posted : 13 April 2007 13:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Shillabeer Interesting questuion, But I would say if it is now used as an officee and not a dwelling the HASAWA applies as do the rest of the regulations including the RR(FSO). There is quite a difference in the council charge regime so you may be in trouble there. But as far as the workplace/house is concerned you need to act quite quickly and put your house/office in order.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 14 April 2007 20:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By saira adams What if the house is still mainly used as a home, and the ones who work from there are 95% of the time family members? Does DDA still apply, etc?
Admin  
#7 Posted : 19 April 2007 22:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nicholas Bell An overly simple response is that a person will (generally) not be in breach of H&S legislation for applying workplace regulations unnecessarily but they could be if they do not comply with legislation that does apply. Perhaps the easiest starting point is complying with legislation that you can be sure does apply to any employer... e.g. HASAWA, the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 etc. Checking legislation or ACOP for their 'application' and 'interpretation' - usually the first regulations or sections - can be helpful (and you can get the legislation for free at opsi.gov.uk) as you will often find definitions of 'workplace' (e.g. the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regs 1992 do not apply to domestic dwellings).
Admin  
#8 Posted : 19 April 2007 22:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Nicholas Bell Also... in relation to DDA I have checked Part M of the Building Regulations and the building would only need to be upgraded to permit access for persons with disabilities if the use had changed to a shop, institution etc. Go to: http://www.planningporta...s/br/BR_PDF_ADM_2004.pdf
Admin  
#9 Posted : 20 April 2007 07:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson THe HSWA 74 applies to the activities and not to the premises. See Sect. 4.(1).(b). Regards Adrian
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.