Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim
Good morning everyone,
I have an issue with a party wall that is in a fairly poor state and could come down during a construction operation which is starting on Monday next.
The safest alternative we have is to demolish the wall and re-build but the leader of the local council is preventing this, probably for political reasons.
The question is - does the local council leader now become a "Designer" under CDM 2007 and, if so, take on all of the Designer's duties under the Regs?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Granville Jenkins
Hi Crim
First things first, if you wish to touch the party wall or its foundations or the earth that supports the foundations you will need to enter into a 'party wall' agreement with your neighbour as required under the Party Wall etc Act 1996.
If you cannot get an early decision from your neighbour you may find it beneficial to appoint a Party Wall Surveyor. If you need to issue a 'party structure notice' you must give at least 2 months notice.
It is therefore unlikely unless you can get some cooperation out of your neighbour that the issues you are faced with will be resolved in the time frame that you have indicated.
With respect to CDM, CDM is attached to the project and the party wall matters should have been a part of the consultation process with regard to the project to this end your neighbour should have been consulted and given time to make representations at a lot earlier stage of this project.
From a personal point of view it sounds like you may have put your neighbours nose out of joint and that is why they are being somewhat belligerent at this time.
I wish you luck!
Regards
Granville
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim
Hi Granville,
Thanks for the input, the neighbour has been consulted all the way through the process but has refused to budge. Planning permissions have been sought and approved for the work and every attempt possible has been made to get the other side to agree with replacing the wall. Ample time has been allowed but this is a final attempt by the CDM-C to get the council to agree.
The question now is can we use CDM 2007 as an extra lever by including the counsellor as a Designer under the Regs.
Regulation 2 (ACOP page 26) paragraphs (h) and (i) may come intp play here but I would like further input please.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Granville Jenkins
Hi Crim
first point - Find yourself a surveying practice who specialise in the Party Wall Act and the issuing of 'party structure notices'.
second point - it could turn out to be an expensive outing.
third point - Good news - you will eventually get your access (at a cost!).
One final point - is there no way that you could simply circumvent the problem, say by installing permanent steel sheet piling which would support the neighbouring wall and avoid all the hassle you are presently confronted with?
Regards
Granville
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim
Hi Granville,
Your final point is the way we are going unless we can demolish and rebuild. Steel uprights on concrete blocks is quite hazardous as the operatives have to work in close proximity to the wall. We just want to take away the hazard by removing the wall.
I believe all options have been tried but the CDM-C thinks there may be a way of bringing the council into the equation using CDM 07?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By steve e ashton
Crim:
The ACoP identifies that LA / Govt officials may provide advice relating to designs etc - but their input should be seen as 'design constraint' rather than 'design'.
Its not clear from your post what role the 'Council leader' has in this - it may be that he is effectively a 'concerned citizen' - so not a designer (but you don't HAVE to follow his 'orders'). Or he may be representing his officials - in which case his input is 'design constraint'. Either way - the simple answer to your query is that NO, you can't invoke CDM to make him more cautious about insisting on a more hazardous way of doing things (although you might query his authority to insist on anything if the planning application etc has been processed by his authority...?).
It MIGHT be possible to 'lean on' the council leader by way of S3 of HaSaWA - but this would be by way of informal discussion rather than formally invoking Regs.
Not sure if this helps - para 117 of the ACoP refers.
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim
Steve,
Thanks,
We're going ahead with the work in the hope that we don't cause the wall to fall.
We will provide steel uprights in concrete blocks, with additional safety of a shoring system, again using concrete as pad-stones. Lots of extra work but doing everything reasonably practicable to ensure safety.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
Crim
I would urge you strongly to get the HSE involved in this before you start working anywhere near this wall, and certainly do not carry out any actions that suggest you may do it shortly - I have seen prohibition notices issued for this very reason. If the area is currently open to the public get the LA engineers involved to declare the wall a dangerous structure. At that point, whatever the councillor may say there are a range of powers available.
If you are on site you will still need HSE help - I do not think this is anything to do with designer duties as your client has made this decision not the party wall owner. Even money is not necessarily going to force the issue even if the owner is recalcitrant. - I have seen best part of £1m + demanded for a lock up
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Granville Jenkins
Hi Crim
Must admit I am not up to date on the revised CDM Regulations, but by coincidence I am on an training day tomorrow, which I hope will shed some light on the topic of this discussion.
Regards
Granville
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Granville Jenkins
Hi Crim
You really need to have a structural engineers report to back up your proposed action; if the foundations to the wall are disturbed the wall may not simply move sideways but may pivot about the foundations and rotate in an arc and it will be the force/inertia created by this reaction that your barrier would need to resist.
Your proposed system may resist some lateral/sideways movement at the base of the barrier but how would it cope with an overturning motion created by the wall striking the top section of the barrier?
If you wanted to carry out such an action you would need to introduce raking struts to support the top section of the barrier.
An option may be to introduce a retaining wall structure that would support the neighbours property - to this end you would again need the services of a structural engineer.
With respect to CDM this is not your neighbours problem, CDM is tied to the project not your neighbours action in not allowing you to demolish their wall. This is an obstacle that needed to be gotten over during the planning stages of the project and not be left to the eleventh hour! Regrettably, these types of situation do arise from time to time in the best laid plans of mice and men, if and when resolved it can all be put down to lifes experiences and the lesson's learnt.
I wish you every success with your project.
Regards
Granville
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
Crim
You have identified a significant risk to your operatives and must therefore ensure their safety whilst working in the area. I had a similar problem not tooo long ago where the owner refused even to allow his own party wall surveyor access to the interal area of the building to check for recent movement. The LA has the powers to order remediation and must therefore be used - this is why I reccomend the HSE involvement as they can be very persuasive at times with recalcitrant wall owners where safety of public/workers is threatened. It will backfire however if you are seen to be working or about to work in an area you have assessed as high risk.
You are putting the operatives to work and must assess the risks and manage them adequately. If your own structural engineers feel the wall is unstable then all work may be too hazardous before the wall is stabilised or demolished - Hammering piling etc or any form of dig is out of the question until the issues are resolved.
The condition of the wall should have been noted at the planning stage and suitable consents obtained, as the LA appears to be the owner this was even more vital to avoid the political football game. Your client potentially has a claim against their own advisers and I think your QS team need to look at the best means of obtaining a contractual delay on the basis that the site is not ready for occupancy. I personally think a 2-3 month delay could occur if the HSE are unable to bring a change of heart.
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Andrew D Thompson
I would suggest you seek the advice of a Chartered Surveyor as you appear very confused about the relationship between the Party Wall etc Act 1996 and the CDM Regs 2007.
The Party Wall Act is clear that an owner seeking to develop a party wall must serve a Notice and follow the requirements of section 10 in the event of a dispute. The Act has a clear method of dealing with a lack of response from an Adjoining Owner.
Nothing in CDM 2007 replaces or removes the obligation of a Building Owner to comply with the Act. The Adjoining Owner is protected by the Act and may seek an injuction and costs if development proceeds without Notice/Award.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim
Good afternoon all,
Thanks for all the responses, due to some excellent advice received in this thread we have formally invited a HSE Inspector to visit the site next week, before any work is carried out.
I realise that we may now see the Inspector on more than one occasion, following the invitation, but see it as some quite heavy support to get things right first time every time during this project.
I will keep you posted.
Many thanks to all who contributed.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
Crim
Good luck with them and remember keep all operatives off site while they are there and do not put deadline dates in front of them, at least not too heavily.
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Granville Jenkins
I would make one final comment - you may be able to register the wall as a dangerous structure with the local authority, I don't know a lot about the procedure for reporting the wall, but there is a fair bit of information from local authorities on the web (just type in 'dangerous structure notice' and then search for the local council site. It is likely that such an action will put the onus on the council to inspect and remedy any significant defects. The council doing nothing would not be an option!
Good Luck!
Regards
Granville
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.