Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 26 April 2007 11:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Garry Homer
Does anyone know of any prosecutions under these regulations?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 26 April 2007 12:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Meiklejohn
Garry

Don't know if there's been any prosecutions have but i have seen an improvement notice issued by the HSE for bad posture/seating arrangements.

Andrew
Admin  
#3 Posted : 26 April 2007 12:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs
I looked last year and found nothing.

I missed the improvement notice, I am aware of one "minded to" letter but that's all.

15 years, many places still not compliant, can't help but think it is guidance more than law *wink*
Admin  
#4 Posted : 26 April 2007 12:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Meiklejohn
think the actual reason there are very few notices and improvements under the auspices of the dse regulations is that the worst practices i have seen are in call centres which come under local authority control the.

I believe the HSE would be far more proactive in these area!

Andrew
Admin  
#5 Posted : 26 April 2007 12:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Leese
I have this feeling the HSE were issued with some sort of notice to get their own DSE arrangments sorted - possibly 5/6 years ago.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 26 April 2007 12:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Garry Homer
Interesting points you have raised as it was the HSE who passed on the policing of the legislation to the Local Authorities!
Admin  
#7 Posted : 30 April 2007 07:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Derek Piercy
Hi Garry
I think the Midland case is about 10 years old. The quote below is from http://www.infinn.com/infopack.html

the Midland Bank had to pay £550,000 in compensation and costs in a case brought by five women who suffered Repetitive Strain Injury (RSI). Judge Byrt ruled that the bank had breached its duty of care to staff by not allowing adequate breaks away from their computers. This is the first time that a court has accepted diffuse RSI as an injury caused by work
Admin  
#8 Posted : 30 April 2007 11:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brigham
Here's a link to a database that was initially the work of Loughborough University
http://www.humanetechnol....uk/registered/intro.php it might help you

Ron
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.