Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 19 May 2007 07:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adrian Watson
Article 6. — (1) of the RR(FS)O 2005 states:

"This Order does not apply in relation to —

(a)domestic premises, except to the extent mentioned in article 31(10);"

Article 31(10) states "(10) In this article, “premises” includes domestic premises other than premises consisting of or comprised in a house which is occupied as a single private dwelling and article 27 (powers of inspectors) shall be construed accordingly."

Article 31. — (1) states "If the enforcing authority is of the opinion that use of premises involves or will involve a risk to relevant persons so serious that use of the premises ought to be prohibited or restricted, the authority may serve on the responsible person or any other person mentioned in article 5(3) a notice (in this Order referred to as “a prohibition notice”)."

From this I presume that all articles other than 31 do not apply to housing stock. This means that the responsible person must ensure the premises are safe from risk of fire but no more than that. Any other opinions?

Regards Adrian LLM

Admin  
#2 Posted : 19 May 2007 14:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By pluto
Adrian,

This is a very complex area, indeed so complex that the relevant government departments have shied away from giving much definitive advice on exactly what this means.

The RRO does not apply to 'single private dwellings' (e.g terraces, semis etc) or to the private, singly occupied areas of flats but does apply to the common areas of multiply occupied residential premises such as HMO's, apartments blocks, sheltered accommodation.

It also applies to the private areas of multiply occupied private areas when there is reasonable grounds for suspecting such serious danger from fire as to make a prohibition notice necessary. At that point enforcement and all the powers of enforcers become available. Residents only really become 'relevant persons' under the RRO when they leave their appartment an enter the common areas, something they must do to escape a fire.

It gets rather more confusing in premises that are shared housing which are termed HMO's under the Housing Act but not under the RRO.

Any day now, a working party including CIEH, LACORS and CFOA will publish a protocol to help address some of these anomalies.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 20 July 2007 09:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Leese
Any day now, a working party including CIEH, LACORS and CFOA will publish a protocol to help address some of these anomalies.

Any news of this yet?

Admin  
#4 Posted : 21 July 2007 11:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter Leese
http://www.cieh.org/libr...e%20Protocol%20final.pdf

Possibly this is it but it is undated and on first sight isn't helping with the queries.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.