Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 05 June 2007 14:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steven John Nelson
During a review of our occupational road risk policy, the question of the provision -or not- of roadside assistance has arisen.

I work for a local authority, and I understand that we, as the employer, are responsible for management of risks associated with our employees using their cars on our business. It appears to me that the provision of roadside assistance for our drivers would reduce some of the [significant] risks they face, say during a breakdown in the night in isolated place, possibly carrying a vulnerable passenger on behalf of the Authority.

Does anyone know of any guidance or best practice on this issue, particularily in the local authority sector ?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 06 June 2007 08:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MT
I think I'll come and work for your local authority! The one I work for has no regard for the safety of their staff who are out driving as part of their work. I skidded on black ice in January and received no help whatsoever with the recovery of my vehicle or payment of my insurance excess, and after all, the journey I was making was not of my choosing.

Sounds like you work for one of the better authorities, who take an interest in their staff's safety and wellbeing.

I for one would like to see a recovery service provided for staff using their own vehicles for company business and also help with paying insurance excess following an accident, which was not my fault and on a journey which I had to make on their behalf.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 06 June 2007 10:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stupendous Man
MT, bit OTT to say that you didn't chose to make the journey when you had your accident. Surely you chose to work for an employer who required you to have a car available for use.

Your mileage rates (and any essential car users allowance) will include elements for wear and tear, maintenance and insurance alongside the element for petrol.

I'm not saying that mileage rates paid are adequate - IMHO they are not, but am making the point that the LA already provides a contribution towards having a vehicle available and this includes recovery if felt necessary.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 06 June 2007 10:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MT
You're right, the rates are far from adequate, and once the authority implements Single Status, I will see the amount I am reimbursed for the authority's use of my car decrease significantly. It in no way reflects the additional wear and tear on my vehicle caused by the business miles I drive each year.

Anyway, I think this discussion is veering way off topic, so I'll leave it there.

Admin  
#5 Posted : 06 June 2007 10:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Philby'
Steven,

I think it would be very commendable, but it doesnt happen here....and is unlikely to do so....and despite great strides to fairness, by the removal of company cars from senior officers, the usual status lead stance goes for the provision of just about anything regardless of need...ie car parking, laptops, phones, ipads etc....

MT

have you tried claiming the costs back, we do at least make that provision here for 'loss'

Stupendous,

as you say, the mileage rates dont cover jip really, and I do think that company car drivers really dont know/remember the real value of their perk nor the real costs involved.

Philby
Admin  
#6 Posted : 06 June 2007 14:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Linda Westrupp
I also work for a large LA and we don't provide this. In fact this one does not allow essential car user either so everyone is on casual user. this is despite the fact that JDs and job adverts state that you should have access to a car for work and there are rules about the type of insurance you need. There is even a written requirement to carry passengers as part of work. The only provision here is that there is an additional insurance scheme (which you pay yourself) to cover parking on staff car parks, and a couple of 'pool' vehicles which you can book if you don't want to use your own car. These, however, are vans but at least they are covered by a recovery service. I now tell staff who need to drive any distance, especially transporting a Service User, to book a pool vehicle so they are covered in case of breakdowns/accidents etc. Oh, and you don't get anything towards your excess if you are in an accident, another reason for taking the pool van.
Linda
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.