Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 06 June 2007 19:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By KCS Hello, Just curious on what peoples views are about safety advisors who have various qualifications i.e NEBOSH general,diploma BUT with no construction experience, entering into the construction industry?.I have spoken to some people who think that it is perfectly acceptable that if a person completes the NEBOSH construction certificate and passes then that's alright, i have also spoken to the lads/lasses on the ground who say otherwise! Views from people who have come 'of the tools' most appreciated. Regards KCS
Admin  
#2 Posted : 06 June 2007 20:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve99Jones Whilst I haven't come from the tools, I have come from the construction industry and am now a full time Health and Safety professional (CMIOSH). My background is as a Chartered Civil Engineer, and one of the main things that actually brought me into the world of health and safety was the poor standards of health and safety support being offered by some other health and safety professionals. I found it increasingly difficult to understand how some health and safety practitioners could call themselves (construction) health and safety professionals, they clearly did not understand the nature of the construction/building industry or the risks and hazards involved. I can therefore fully appreciate the concerns that have been expressed to you and I would always suggest that any safety advisor/consultant working in the construction industry must have construction industry experience, and this does not mean that someone who has been working as a construction safety advisor for 10 years. It means someone who has worked in the construction industry. With the launch of the new CDM ACOP it is refreshing to see that the HSE are also begining to understand this as well, hence the need for the CDM Co-ordinator to have construction/design experience, and also for contractors to have access to specific 'Construction Safety Advice' as well as 'General Health and Safety Advice'. With regards to advisors with qualifications but without the experience, anyone who applies themselves can gain a NEBOSH certificate, it is not that difficult. But even then this only relates to qualifications in Health and Safety, NOT construction. Also Competence is clearly a combination of both Qualifications AND Experience, so someone with a NEBOSH Certificate or Diploma and no experience could never be classed as competent, though they could of course work under the supervision of another competent person, but how many years would they need to do this for? Steve
Admin  
#3 Posted : 07 June 2007 08:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By The toecap All very true. But if you wanted to start, as we all did at one time. Where do you get started?
Admin  
#4 Posted : 07 June 2007 08:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp It is an interesting and valid question and not just peculiar to the construction but applies to all 'specialist' and high risk industries. From my perspective a person should have both a good knowledge of the industry and associated hazards as well as any formal qualifications. I work in the rail industry and have done for over twenty years, it does not make me an expert, but I am familiar with most aspects of the industry. Within my role I need a certain amount of construction knowledge, but I would not consider myself competent as a construction h&s advisor - NEBOSH Construction Certificate or not. Just my humble opinion. Ray
Admin  
#5 Posted : 07 June 2007 09:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By William O'Donnell On the question of 'experience'. The fact that someone has come through from the 'shop floor' may actually be a bad thing. Many poor safety practices are inherited, "that's the way I was shown how to do it when I first started", and someone who has worked in a single industry all their working life may not be in a position to identify alternative ways of doing things. Having a long history of doing something wrong without getting killed, does not make you 'competent'. Is the suggestion that I need to spend the next ten years as a brickie to enable me to identify the hazards on a building site? Experience is only one element of 'competence', and can be measured in many ways, and certainly not merely by time served.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 07 June 2007 10:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim So I'm not competent then! My background is 25 years fire service, (Station Officer) from leaving school, then into industrial health and safety. The last 8 years specialising in construction, mainly CDM projects for a shopfitting company, and the past 3 years self employed - mainly construction. Various training courses including CDM, NVQ levels 3 and 4, Access Scaffolding etc. I undertake risk assessments including Fire, and provide method statements and training, including site induction training on a regular basis. I never have, and never will pick up a "tool" on a construction site as that part of the business is best left to those who are trained and experienced, but I see myself as a good manager of health and safety who is never questioned about my ability, in fact frequently praised by other construction professionals, CDM-C and MD's), for the high standard of work I provide. I pick up new clients from recommendations and since going self employed three years ago have never had to "seek" new work, it always finds me. Fire risk assessers do not have to be ex fire service as they become "competent" by training, knowing thier business, and following the accepted format for fire risk assessment. I'm sure some of you will try to pick all sorts of holes in what I say but I don't believe you have to have been on the tools to be a safety adviser in any form of work. Good health and safety is provided by conscientious people who are good at what they do because they put the effort in. My CMIOSH came from being RSP, that because I have a broad range of H & S experience. Some CMIOSH now do not have that broad range due to changes in the way CMIOSH is gained. I don't criticise them so why criticise someone like me?
Admin  
#7 Posted : 07 June 2007 10:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp Crim I don't think anyone is criticising you, perhaps giving different opinions as the original post requested. There are no 'rights' or 'wrongs' here, we are all qualified people in our own right; recognising our limitations is an important part of being a competent and professional person. Regards
Admin  
#8 Posted : 07 June 2007 11:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham Why just construction? Surely this argument could be applied to any sector of industry. Or would having gained a NEBOSH certificate or diploma qualify you to provide safety advice in anything from a nuclear power station to an offshore oil platform, of course, via a pharmaceutical manufacturer? I take the view that what is important for any health and safety advisor is to know their limitations and know when to decide that specialist help might be needed. The basic considerations may be similar, but there are many variations and no one person can be an expert in all fields of health and safety, or knowledgeable about all the different workplaces that exist. I hold no "professional" qualifications. There aren't any relevant to my special area of interest and expertise in health and safety. Unfortunately, I often encounter actions and policies in workplaces that are counter-productive, sometimes implemented by qualified health and safety people, who haven't realised how complex my particular field can be. Perhaps health and safety personnel should remeber the slogan: "The danger arises when you don't know that you don't know!" Chris
Admin  
#9 Posted : 07 June 2007 11:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By steve e ashton I would say it depends on the role of the safety person and the culture of the particular site. If the site needs someone who can 'tell 'em how to do it' - then (probably) it would be best if the safety person had done the job themselves. Although it could be argued that the site supervisors should be doing this - why employ a dog when you can bark yourself? (NB I am NOT deriding the excellent work done by safety personnel on sites where this approach IS necessary....) If the site needs someone with an open mind, a questioning approach and a knowledge of 'how other people do it' then its probably best if the safety person comes from another industry sector. My own view - a good safety officer or inspector probably came from the industry - a good safety advisor or auditor probably came from outside the industry, and a good safety manager may have come from either side of the fence. (And a good safety consultant is only good if he tells you what you want to know - so it depends where you came from...) The CHIB Final Report into the Texas City Explosion makes the point that a 'closed shop' internal approach to auditing is probably not a good thing. I would echo that sentiment. It is far too easy for industry (or even single company) insiders to become 'blinkered' and fail to spot issues which may be blindingly obvious to outsiders. Having worked (as a manager and as a consultant) in various other sectors without sector-specific upbringing I am aware of the need to be careful when phrasing questions (and advice) so as to avoid provoking a negative "what do you know? You've never...." response. Its a key skill of any good H&S professional - Jack of all Trades, Master of None (well... maybe one or two). Tread softly, keep an open mind, listen carefully, look over the fence very frequently. Make sure you're (nearly) always right - and I believe you can make the transition to any sector. Just personal opinions.... Steve
Admin  
#10 Posted : 07 June 2007 12:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By KEVIN O'KANE As someone who started life as a time served plumber , and has worked as a adviser in a construction industry i think it has help to build relationships ...which is what the job is about as far as I am concerned. Did enjoy one site visit were I commented on the bad standard of some pipework ...was overheard by person who had done it "what would you know whats good and whats bad"....suit jacket off and hung on scaffold, loosen tie and proceed to bend copper pipe and put up against his ..."that will be about it" I say...put jacket back on ,leave walk to car, and drive out gate PRICELESS!!!
Admin  
#11 Posted : 07 June 2007 12:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By alex mccreadie I have been in the Construction Industry for about 15 Years Safety for 10. My opinion is that provided you approach the role with common sense and be approachable this should be enough. We can when stuck refer to Regulations but you do not need to be able to quote them. I cannot Tig Weld but I could tell you if the welder is using the correct PPE power source and ensuring those around him are safe. I would suggest this comes from common sense. I learn something most days in life. When I go on sites I do not quote LOLER BS7121 Parts 1 & 5 (I Could) this gets peoples backs up. I inform them I am there to work with them and get things right between us. For the New Startes out there like Toecap dig in use your common sense ands you wont go far wrong. Now I am ready to expect the Flak but as stated this is my opinion.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 07 June 2007 12:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim Kevin, you may have enjoyed that site visit but I wonder what the plumber thought of you - "smart a**e" I should think. Not very professional to make a site operative feel small! You should have used the "arm around the shoulder" method to get him on your side. Good communication is essential, and so is the expectation that everyone on site has been appointed so as to match their individual expertise with the job they are asked to perform. I don't necessarily know everyone's job but I can communicate the health and safety message in a way they can understand. The best approach is to take a step back and look at the big picture, then we can see what is needed. Also think about who might be looking at us and make sure we get the job right first time thus avoiding criticism of ourselves. I think I'm digressing a bit but ther you are!
Admin  
#13 Posted : 07 June 2007 14:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kevin Kelly having moved into H&S after serving an electrical apprentiship I do feel that the knowledge I gained from working in the industry has been a huge advantage to me. Not only do you learn the right way to do a job you also learn the wrong way to do it and almost on a daily basis I see people setting themselves up to start a task and I know from the shape of things how they intend to do it. It certainly gives more credibility on site when you've been through the mill so to speak and if somebody asks the usual "well how am I going to do it???" and you can say "well how if you looked at taking this angle (or whatever)" it is a huge plus. I also see it on a regular basis when dealing with subcontractors safety personnel who come from, say, a retail background on a construction site who can't distinguish between a length of electrical conduit and a plumbers copper pipe. Construction is such a high risk industry that all personnel in safety need to have as much experience as necessary and this experience is mainly gained form being "on the tools" in a previous role.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 07 June 2007 14:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By mrs.seed Dont spoil his memory, due to the nature of the job, the 'arm round the shoulder' approach is sometimes going to get you the 'punch where it hurts' you have to use the right approach at the time - besides wouldnt you have been tempted! I work in the construction industry and have always found it helpful to have been a site engineer before I fell off the wagon into health and safety. I dont know if its 'female in a mans world' thing - I've always ignored that and got on with the job in hand - but as soon as people hear that I used to be where they are, you can see them relax and respect what you say a lot quicker. The one thing that will trip you up on site ( and I imagine most industries) is knowing the terminology used.
Admin  
#15 Posted : 08 June 2007 09:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By KEVIN O'KANE Crim, he did not think that , in fact it raised my profile on that site ..I had got my hands dirty etc. It was not my intention to belittle him.It was to change the perception of elf & safety personnel, which I might add was a problem on this site.I did'nt intend the thread to come across as me being a big I am ..because I would hate my peers on this forum to think that of me. Kevin
Admin  
#16 Posted : 08 June 2007 10:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Gff I can be seen regularly plying my trade on site in between meetings Does wonders for your credibility
Admin  
#17 Posted : 30 June 2007 11:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By gerry james campbell After reading all the Blogs, full support the idea of a industry based experience approach, in sub-sea construction, for example, an Offshore Manager has all the knowledge to keep his crew safe, he may need an adviser to help the team comply,train and understand issues. On the qualifications, there is no substitute in my industry, just years of hard earned experience which is then applied. You can take all the NEBOSH courses in the world, but still the crew will not listen to you unless you have been down there with them, in the snow, rain, heat of a hostile environment. NEBOSH OR NOBOSH.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 30 June 2007 17:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By B Smart I personally don't think it matters if you got your elf and safety experience in an other industry, rather than in construction, especially if it an industry which has a better elf and safety record. Lets face it, the construction needs new ideas as the present accident/incident rate is simply not good enough. I believe that coming from a construction background might gain you brownie points with the boys, but your elf and safety experiences might be lacking in substance, compared to someone involved in safety who comes from an industry with a good safety record. B. Smart
Admin  
#19 Posted : 30 June 2007 22:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Martyn Hendrie I cannot agree with Mr Smart. Putting his suggestion into a medical context we would bring in "ear nose and throat" specialist to teach heart surgeons how to operate because they have a better mortality rate for their operations. Industries with better accident records often are better because they have less risk.
Admin  
#20 Posted : 01 July 2007 10:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian G Hutchings I think there can be misconceptions around what makes people effective health and safety professionals. Qualifications are in reality a small part of the equation; but are necessary. To answer the original post I believe you do need experience, but this can be less if there is a willing and able senior H&S practitioner on hand to coach and guide. We all have to start somewhere. There are some practitioners who may have less experience but are excellent influencers and can ask the right questions: they are more effective than old hands who are totally stuck in their ways, who have never had any access to other industries. I believe (will probably get shot for saying this!) that the one of the construction industries biggest issues is not listening to people outside. Opening minds and knocking down mental barriers will go a long way to learning how to do things better. The current stats clearly show that the current situation isn't working. Cheers Ian
Admin  
#21 Posted : 01 July 2007 12:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve99Jones Ian You say that by looking at the stats clearly something isn't being done right, but if you look at the wider stats and compare the UK construction industry with that of any of our other European neighbours, then surely we are in fact doing something right. I tend to believe that overall H&S in the UK Construction industry is very well managed, though as Martyn has indicated it is a hazardous industry in which many of the risks cannot be totally eliminated. It is not a controlled factory or office environment and as you have already indicated, to suggest that the construction industry does not look or listen to developments in other industries is a major insult to those who work tirelessly to make the industry even safer and to protect the lives of those working in the construction industry. As for B Smart's comments on other industries with better safety records, well what can you really say to such comments as those making such comments really do not understand the issues on site, which goes back to the question raised in the original posting!! My personal opinion is that all too often there are people who maybe fancy a change from their current role, and see the construction industry as easy way of doing this. That is exactly what happen with the role of the Planning Supervisor in the mid 1990's, and we all know about the problems associated with 'Bad' planning supervisors! Safety professional need to accept that there are specialist areas of health and safety in which they may or may not have the right expertise, competence is after all knowing your limitations. Steve
Admin  
#22 Posted : 01 July 2007 12:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian G Hutchings Hi Steve I do agree that there is obviously some excellent work being done and in no way would I wish to offend anyone. Looking back my comment is probably too general; though it is based on many experiences I have had. However what I have found is that the hard work and efforts from some of the leading firms are now filtering down the supply chain, which is great. Something I seem to keep coming across is clients not being willing to pay for good quality advice. Maybe because H&S is not seen by some as a business value, they always seek the lowest denominator. The main areas of concern are really on the small to medium sites and SME contractors. Unfortunately it is these smaller contracts where the majority of fatalities appear to happen. I was at a contractors last week who knew hardly anything about CDM, though it applied to some of their work and they were CHAS approved etc. Probably not willing to pay our fees though! Hopefully the pressure from the supply chain plus some good and practical advice will help these smaller businesses out. Cheers Ian
Admin  
#23 Posted : 02 July 2007 09:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GARRY WIZZ In general, i.e. one size does not fit all. The quality of the person will decide the outcome. I have worked with people with very few qualifications and they have been useless through to excellent. The reverse is true, got the 'initials' but again, some good and some bad. The complexity of the new 'field' and the capeabilities of the person entering this arena will dictate if it is a safe progression. 6 months ago I moved from Logistics to what I would call light engineering / light construction. Its not rocket science so I was not swamped at the start but I am better at it to-day then when I started. Our company has a large customer base from small to large companies . We frequently make use sub contractors. In my limited experience I have noted that most sub contractors have employed a safety advisor but the blokes doing the work are doing what ever.... When going onto the big sites owned by national companies, the procedures read great but my observations are that it all stops after the signature. So to answer the question, yes you can move fields, To do a great job you need the qualifications which provide the fundamental knowledge base, experience to convert the knowledge into a real result, the right person to do the job. If you have the right person, a structured move into construction, no problems.It is not that difficult. So there is not a yes or no answer to your question, far to many variables. If people are to change fields each case will have to be assessed to reach a sensible conclusion.
Admin  
#24 Posted : 03 July 2007 20:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By B Smart Martyn, you are correct when you state that “Industries with better records often are better because they have less risk”, however it could be argued that you took my response to the question out of context in the wrong way. If you take the response that I made and put it into a medical context it might be more appropriate to suggest that it would be like asking a British Doctor to work in Africa! However I do understand why you responded the way you did. Steve99Jones I have to take issue with your comments “As for B Smart's comments on other industries with better safety records, well what can you really say to such comments as those making such comments really do not understand the issues on site, which goes back to the question raised in the original posting!!” Making this comment on a public forum is both insulting and untrue. I find this kind of comment from a fellow IOSH member disheartening and definitely not what I would expect from a Professional in Health and Safety. I do not expect everyone on this forum to agree with all of my opinions all the time, and I do expect to see people disagree with me from time to time, but what I do not expect is a personal insult for holding an opinion which might not be of the norm. For your information I work in the Offshore Construction Industry and also consult in the Construction Industry onshore. I do come from a construction background albeit along time ago. My opinions on the question asked on this thread are formed by my experiences in both these industries, and my training through the TUC where I have had the great pleasure of sharing knowledge and experiences with people from many different industries, including Rail, Prison Warders, Police, Fire Services, Nuclear, Catering to name a few. Each industry has it’s own unique methods and systems and sharing best practices with people from these industries has highlighted the fact that yes the Construction Industry is hazardous, but there are other industries that are just as hazardous, if not more hazardous. In my opinion the difference is in the Safety Culture! If anyone takes issue with what I say please feel free to email me direct. B. Smart
Admin  
#25 Posted : 05 July 2007 10:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AlB H&S Management is not rocket science. H&S in Construction is defineteley not rocket science. I moved from an extractive indusrty and manufacturing into construction and actually found the people in construction easier to deal with and less abrasive, found the risks in general to be less complex and easier to undestand and find the root cause and solve. Perceptions that only those individuals that have worked in Construciton can add value to construction from a risk management persepctive is ludicrous. Other industries are far more advanced than the Construciton industry in terms of managing and controlling risk and individuals from these industruies can add a significant amount of value to the consutruction industry. I think what should be said is that those professionals who move from another industry and treat the construcion industry the same needs to take a step back and rethink their tact.
Admin  
#26 Posted : 05 July 2007 10:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AlB Sorry.... hadn't finished There are factions of construction that I do not deem myself competent to advise upon. What I do in these instances is become familiar with the issues, learn the requirements and best practices and then work with the specialist contractors who are competent in the work and mutually work towards identifying the issues and solving them. They know what they need to do and I work withe them towards ensuring it is safe. When a practitioner comes along and thinks they know best without listenting to the facts from the trade, THAT is when problems arise - but that is problem arising due to personal appproach rather than a lack of experience in that matter.
Admin  
#27 Posted : 05 July 2007 10:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JPK WOW.. nice thread guys! KCS, my question to you would be this... Do you understand construction and its risks? Do you feel CONFIDENT to speak to a Builder, Surveyor, Architect, Engineer, or and other profession about construction related issues? Do you understand the legal aspects of H&S within construction? Answer yes, you are half way there... Then you could begin to look into advising contractors on the legalities or H&S within construction. There will always be new things that we will all learn as we go. Answer no to any of the above, but really want to get into construction, then I would consider more looking into getting a role with a H&S consultancy that would allow you to learn the industry and be a little more confident in your ability over time.
Admin  
#28 Posted : 05 July 2007 12:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JPK BTW: I started with a trade, then moved through the industry.... Supervisory, CIOB management level and now use the experience I have gained, quite successfully in H&S.
Admin  
#29 Posted : 05 July 2007 12:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian G Hutchings JPK I would say it is the other way round. Why would someone use a consultant that cannot provide competent advice? If you start as an assistant of supporting professional in a larger construction firm, at least you have guidance from more experienced people. I think consultancy requires you to be competent; you can however have a junior consultant working alongside a senior practitioner. Ian
Admin  
#30 Posted : 05 July 2007 16:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JPK Please excuse me Ian, I wasn't clear in my post. It was working as an assistant (learning the industry as such) within a Construction H&S Consultancy that I was refering to. Sorry if I wasn't clear. JPK
Admin  
#31 Posted : 10 July 2007 18:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AMS Umm, very interesting!! Just wanted to add my thoughts :-) I'm in construction safety, having come into it from an admin point of view (safety admin I might add!!!). Currently doing an advisor role under good supervision from a number of people. Feel happy about talking to all relevant people both internally & externally to my company. The things I know, I know & others I hoping to learn. I won't see myself as a Construction safety specialist or 'manager' for at least 10+ years but hopefully by that time I'll have plently of experience in construction.
Admin  
#32 Posted : 12 July 2007 13:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By KCS thanks for your advise chaps, i would like to become a construction safety specialist and i have the following site experience i have done bricklaying and concreting(built a bbq) i have done earthworks (dug the allotment) i have done groundworks (laid a nice patio) i have done joiney (done some decking outside) i have done electical instalation (fitted outside lights around patio) i have done steelfixing (tied the bbq hob in) i have hired plant equipment from hss so with some of your posts all i need now is to do the NEBOSH Construction certificate and i'm away. I think i'll keep a construction health & safety book in the car for reference
Admin  
#33 Posted : 12 July 2007 14:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun cooper I have been thinking about running a course for all the hands on guys who want to become a health & safety advisor. The course will be from the University of Hard Knocks.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.