Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 15 June 2007 17:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J. Robin Gatenby
Has anyone any thoughts/idea/experience in dealing with the risks associated with staff being "assaulted" (kicked, bitten, punched, etc) by children that have a defined medical condition, such as autism?

I am trying to find some realistic, practical and acceptable control measures to prevent the staff being injured!!

Thanks

Robin
Admin  
#2 Posted : 15 June 2007 17:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By SLS
J

My experience of conditions such as Autism comes from the fact my son was diagnosed with ASD at a very early age. Luckily he has no violent tendencies.

My son has constant 'helpers' with him at his main stream school (all with appropriate qualifications/experience) - my advice would be to talk with these qualified members of staff. They should be able to help you. After all, apart from the other school kids, they will be the people at most risk. Another option to try would be to contact your local authority and/or local Autistic support group.

I hope my comments are of some help to you, I'm sorry i cant be more specific - i hope you find the information you are looking for.

SLS
Admin  
#3 Posted : 18 June 2007 09:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Daniel
My wife works as a Paediatric physio, so has these issues as well as low level manual handling problems - children are treated at floor level in play therapy, and disabled children may react unexpectedly during handling. We've had numerous discussions on this theme.

One issue of note is that there is an option for children to be "statemented" which requires a statement of educational need and associated support to be produced.

Many of these statements are I understand rather vague and lack objectivity and specific commitment. I also understand that educational risk assessments seem to be also not heavily focused on these types of issues, probably because they are poorly understood by "outsiders".

I advocated that such statementing and production of "care plans" is actually beneficial and should be very specific because it can encompass a risk assessment and enable a package of support to be specified, and that even where a legal "statement" is not considered necessary, application of such principles is desirable.

From a clinical viewpoint, clinicians are increasingly encoraged to move to justify their intervention and establishing and specifying packages of support is important and necessary.

I would advise you work with the system, integrate risk assessments into existing procedures and systems and make these more objective and useable, if you are in a position to do so.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 18 June 2007 10:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight
I have worked for organisations which have provided care and support for adults with autism; there are some steps that you should, indeed must take.

The first thing is that individual acre plans should examine the behaviour for each person; this is usually done using something like ABC (antecedents, behaviour, consequences) and is really about looking for what might trigger the behaviours.

The second is a great deal of staff training, starting by tackling the idea that 'its just part of the job'. Training should look at using ABC charts (or whatever system you use), de-escalating and avoiding conflict, disengagement (running away!), details of behaviour modification programmes and so on.

The rights of the child are important, but to allow them to behave in violent and anti-social ways isn't the best way to promote their dignity and right to a community presence. for this reason you need to see all this as part of a structured non-aversive behaviour management programme.

I haven't got any details of training providers; its seven years since I last had any involvement with this sort of thing, and I am not and never have been capable of delivering the training, but there are some brilliant providers out there,

John
Admin  
#5 Posted : 18 June 2007 10:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Son of SkyWalker
One issue that has to be overcome is the resistance in reporting these issues using appropriate forms. There is a fear of stigmatising the children e.g. in a school setting.

One method I have used to try to increase the reporting, therefore gaining a better insight of the problem, is to record these as behavioural incidents. This lets the BI's be viewed and responded to on their own instead of being swallowed up as violent incidents. Trends can be identified and resources, including H&S resources, targeted as required.

This can be very effective but it relies upon the incidents being reported in the first place.

Son of Skywalker
Admin  
#6 Posted : 18 June 2007 12:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Thompson CMIOSH
Hi folks Hi John hows things.

As john quite rightly said it is about a behaviour management system, The emphasis is not so much on control but of prevention with defined control strategies if needed. I have assessed and investigated numerous methods and systems over the lat twelve years but the one that works best for us is SCIP UK which is one of the few systems with BILD approval. we do also have to employ more strategic controls for certain individuals for example, we have provided fencing vests and martial arts body armour for females, who were working with one individual who pinched breasts. we ask that all service users have their nails filed on a regular basis. we advise all staff working within this client group to have hepatitis B injections. we had one member of staff who was key worker to a little lad who always bit arms she carried an arm from a doll for him to bite on sooner than hers. some times you just have to be creative.

regards Bob
Admin  
#7 Posted : 18 June 2007 13:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kieran J Duignan
Robin

The degree to which you engage with this risk management challenge depends on how much you are going to invest in appreciating the 'state of play' in managing autism.

Very creative work is being done by consultants through 'Acceptance and Commitment Therapy' (ACT) and the associated form of 'third wave' behaviourism.

I believe you would find Tony Balacz and others in this field supportive. If you try to trace them through Google and Yahoo and have difficulty doing so, you are welcome to give me a call on 020 8654 0808, 9 through 5.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.