Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richard_Sams I work for a medium sized construction firm who have recently sub-contracted another firm to undertake the demolition work on a building that we are completely refurbishing. Part of the demolition requires removing pre-cast concrete stairs (6 flights). It is not possible to use a crane to lift the stairs out in sections. Propping the stairs from underneath while breaking them up with jack-hammers has been suggested. Concerns however have been raised about the effect the vibration will have on the stability of the props. Does anyone have any alternative suggestions from experience with similar situations? Any suggestions are welcome.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis Diamond cutting would seem to be a possible solution
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richard_Sams Thanks for the response Bob but how would you propose then getting the cut pieces out of the building keeping in mind that there are 6 flights?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis Is the problem any greater than using jack hammers? - After all the operatives will probably be able to work for somewhere around 30-60 minutes per day. A structural engineer for the demolition company should be able to provide a suitable method, it should not be much different but that is the demolition contractors responsibility.
What is certain is that the HSE would not be overly happy concerning the use of jack hammers.
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By ddraigice Will there be a potential fall issue here too?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter Need more info on existing building layout and perhaps the reasons for removal. Is it possible to get in with the heavy stuff (long articulated reach of a hydraulic nibbler) and nibble the stairs out? May be an option to take down the entire stairwell along with the enclosing structure? Why engage a subcontractor if HE can't provide you with a suitable method?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Peter MacDonald First of all find out the supporting mechanism for the stairs. If they are supported only at each floor height then partial dismantling will result in total collapse without propping. Props can be sacrificial and fixed in place and indeed propping up areas during demolition is not uncommon although it is usually done without the input of an engineer, however I would see this input as essential in this case.
If the stairs are supported horizontally they may (subject to enginneering approval be broken out partially without support. In this case you may want to use a Brokk/Robolition machine to break out the stairs working bottom to top (whereby the machine can then be lifted off the roof if possible) or it can climb the stairs and work it's way down. Floors can be welled on the way up to allow material to drop down or holes can be made through the adjacent stairwell walls and the stairs broken out from there.
If the stairs are to be refitted into the existing stairwell then how are the new stairs being put in? The reverse method of construction can be used for demolition. If the stairwell is being removed entirely then prop the surrounding floor and break out the stairwell with the brok from the floor to be retained.
Basically there's a few ways yo can do this but the mode of support for the floor must be established first (by a competent person).
Good luck.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis I fully support Peter's methodology in principle. Cutting into sections or remote breaker are a necessity - whatever you do, hand breaking simply will not be acceptable. In any case a structural engineer needs to define the method. and support requirements.
I think the point about why remove is also well made. Could the designers not reconsider the need to remove these?
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Peter MacDonald Robert
I would disagree that hand breaking is a complete no no. You would need to carry out and vibration risk assessment and then control trigger times by regular breaks and job rotation. Also by input from an enginneer you could minimise the amount of breaking out to do. The biggest risk then become stability of partly demolished structures( back to propping)and exposure to a fall through the creation of leading edges. If the stairs are not structurally suitable for robolition machines, then breaking out by hand may become a valid option an option, albeit not ideal, it is far from illegal or unsafe if controlled and managed.
Regards
Peter
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis Peter
The vibration exposure levels experienced in hand breaking are likely to exceed the exposure values very quickly. It is the same issue as posed by hand breaking of pile caps. The reality is that a large pool of workers is needed to keep exposure below the limits.
Handbreaking should now be reserved only for minor short term work in my view.
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim The spirit of CDM 2007 is to consider the safety of all workers and Designers are required to look beyond what is directly in front of them.
I believe reconsidering removing this staircase is essential and, if not the Designer/s have a responsibility for providing input for the removal.
HSE are now visiting sites looking for safe planning of all work and with this in mind I recommend all necessary safety barriers are put in place prior to removing the staircase and also plan the work to fit the replacement staircase ASAP after removal of the old. (Out with the old and in with the new).
Not very helpful with regard to the original question but I hope I make sense?
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.