Rank: Guest
|
Posted By steve blackledge first of all i am a local H&S rep in a large warehouse, today a FLT driver was unloading a delivery lorry from the side, he reversed out and turned 90 degree and proceded forwards, as he did two metal bin's fell sideways towards the delivery lorry cab with the contents spilling right upto the lorry, the lorry driver was stood 2 meters back from the cab, no injury occured,,,this time. Our on site FLT engineer inspected the fork's but found no fault as alledged by the driver. The 5 ton FLT has 2.5 meter forks which were lifting 4 metal bins (2+2 1000kg) and it was the end two which fell off, the bin nearest the truck was damaged which held the front bin's slightly off the forks at the rear
The canopy area slopes down hill slightly in the direction which the bin's fell
the FLT driver has a reputation for over eagerness, he even stated that the last four lifts were awkward and the bins swayed about a bit.
This raises several issues
1. should this person be allowed to operate FLT's even if he passes a refresher coarse
2. better control required of delivery drivers and pedestrians who are free to walk aound during unloading, even with high viz clothing
3. can a better re-useable container be used
i have raised a near miss alert and will be following this up with an accident investigation. The FLT operator's manager want's to put it down to the part supplier sending damaged bin's, which in my mind is an easy excuse,,, but only i can close the near miss alert when i feel all actions have been taken to reduce the liklyhood of it happening again, we'll see tommorow.
sorry for the long winded report, have a brew on my tab
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave West What does the risk assessment say about the job? Has safe system of work been produced and trained out to the operator?
One thing that would be on the SSW and would have been trained out to the driver is ASSESS THE LOAD BEFORE LIFTING. It is the drivers responsibility to check the load for damaged to pallets, containers etc and for stability of load. If he noticed damage to the stillages he should of not attempted to take them off. When i was an FLT driver i refused many a load.
A lot of companies have a policy where the driver stays in the cab but this is not always practicable though can be done safely.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MT Yes, sounds like there are several issues going on here. Agree with Dave, that the FLT driver should check the load is is about to lift, and if he identifies damage to the load which means it cannot be lifted safely, then he needs a way of flagging that up and feeling empowered to say that he won't move the load. Regarding the lorry driver almost becoming an accident victim, I would strongly recommend that you review the current situation which as you say is that drivers are free to walk around during unloading. Drivers are a vulnerable group, and procedures should be in place to protect them from other vehicles in the yard. They should be required to report to the warehouse (or wherever) and then there should be somewhere safe for them to go during loading/unloading. The HSE has some good stuff here: http://www.hse.gov.uk/wo...lacetransport/index.htm, especially the inspection checklist which you can print off and use. See item 6 (un)loading activites in particular and 7 on Driver Competence.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By CFT Steve
You have already started to ask questions which clearly shows you don't consider the current control measures suitable.
I believe you have answered your own question.
CFT
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim The FLT operator's manager may be right about the bins being damaged, or just not loaded correctly. You should at least consider this point in your enquiry?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Debbie S We operate FLT's in a warehouse and our risk assessment and SWP states very clearly that the FLT operation may not commence until the driver is either behind a safety barrier or sitting in his cab - thus stopping him being involved in near miss incidents.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By steve blackledge Thanks for the reply's, very much appreciated. the driver concerned admit's he new the bin's were unstable but he felt he had to unload them asap due to work pressure from above. today took a turn for the worse, another FLT driver unloading a two deck trailor turned his truck over at a seperate warehouse, thankfully he was not injured, he lifted a heavy palletised box off the top deck, and as he reversed out the weight of it overturned the truck, it turned out to be overloaded by the customer, this incident is reportable under RIDDOR. Following this incident a couple of employees came to me in confidence to report bad practice from other individual's, this is now a much more high profile investigation so hopefully we can get things moving along before somebody becomes just another stastistic. Wish me luck for tommorow.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By steve blackledge MT, I downloaded that document yesterday, thanks
We have a SSOW in use as well as regular FLT driver assesment and training, along with other form's of training
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By steve blackledge just to clerify, in our SSOW drivers are supposed to remain in cab's during unloading / loading but the FLt drivers tend to turn a blind eye if they get out for a chat or whatever. This IS going to change
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By MT Sounds like you're on the ball Steve. All the best with getting it all sorted out. There's nothing like a near miss to sharpen everyone's minds!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By GARRY WIZZ I had a similar problem at a large warehouse owned by big blue chip company. They did take safety seriously.
Persons competent yes Persons trained Yes
Persons complying with training.... most of the time.
Was I receiving reports from Managers & Supervisors relating to non compliance. NO
So I had 2 main causes.
A)Failure to comply with training SSW B)Supervision failure
Correcting point B went a long way to raising standards.
So amongst the standard checks suggest a review to confirm if the control, supervision does actually work.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By steve blackledge Thanks,
point A same point B same again
like i said before, it's a whole new can of worms today and things ARE going to change, i may only be the local rep but i am very respected at the top of the chain, i may not be at middle managment level by certain persons but they are the one's who will have to bend over to accomodate new system's of work, you can count on that
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.