Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error
Alleged effects of Mobile Phone transmitters.
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Previous Topic Next Topic
Admin  
#1 Posted : 25 July 2007 13:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin
Posted By John Donaldson
There has been much discussion on these pages regarding the alleged effects of Mobile Phone transmitters.

The Department of Psychology at Essex University have been caring out a large scale investigation into these effects and the report has been published today.

Further information can be found on the news release which has just been placed on the Essex Web site at

http://www.essex.ac.uk/news/2007/nr20070725.htm
Back to top
Admin  
#2 Posted : 25 July 2007 14:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin
Posted By Adrian Watson
With 44 people in the study it is not a large scale study.

Regards Adrian
Back to top
Admin  
#3 Posted : 25 July 2007 15:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin
Posted By Pete48
Thanks for the link. However, it doesn't claim to be a large scale study just one of the largest ever completed.
I read the total participants as 158 not 44 but still not a significant number.
Interesting read but no surprises; useful fodder for the journos to pick up on. (watch this space)
Back to top
Admin  
#4 Posted : 25 July 2007 16:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin
Posted By Adrian Watson
University of Essex tested 44 people who had previously reported symptoms or sensitivity to mobile phone technology, and 114 people who had not reported any health effects (controls).

Unfortunately, controls don't count. It's the number of cases that is important.

Regards
Back to top
Admin  
#5 Posted : 25 July 2007 19:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin
Posted By John Murgatroyd
Well, that's a surprise. Not.
When tested and not told that the gear was not actually transmitting, the sensitive souls got it wrong and still had headaches etc.
Whoopee.
And it isn't the biggest test either, nor particularly well done.
Back to top
Admin  
#6 Posted : 26 July 2007 14:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin
Posted By Phil Grace
Not sure it is correct to say "the number of controls don't count"

I am not an epidemiologist but know sufficient to understand that if one is carrying out a study involving a possible source of harm then you have to have matched groups of people. Some who are exhibiting the ill effects due to exposure and a matched control group who are not. And matching implies for age, sex,etc and other exposures to possible sources of harm etc. It is only by matching subjects that other possible sources of harm can be ruled out.
Phil
Back to top
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET