Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 15 August 2007 08:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By The toecap
Have IOSH sponsored the world conker championships? Is it true?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 15 August 2007 08:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GARRY WIZZ
YEP, PRESIDENT MENTIONED IT ON RADIO 4
Admin  
#3 Posted : 15 August 2007 08:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By The toecap
I hope they have goggles on and Kevlar suits and gloves on and the area is cordoned off and all other stuff. They are supervised their must be a doctor to hand and a helicopter standing by.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 15 August 2007 09:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By holmezy


There's absolutely no need to wear any PPE as they will be using a re-designed type of conker. Its been developed after years of trial and error and is made from a latex based material with sufficient hardener in it to give it the same visual and "tactile" feel so it resembles, as near as possible, an actual conker. However the benfits are that it is shatterproof and extremely tough. It also incorporates a built in damper system to prevent it "bouncing" too much on impact. The outer layer is "chestnut" coloured and designed to restrict the release of latex particles so no fear of any reaction there. It is also designed to be light and easy to handle to prevent any WRULDS.

I think its a winner!

Holmezy
(just checking my diary to see if Friday has come early........???)
Admin  
#5 Posted : 15 August 2007 10:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
Holmzey

I presume the real imitation has a brittle outer shell designed to crack when hit sufficiently hard and expose a firm white inner part which shears in some way to give fragmentation and ultimate failure.

We could actually grow a real substitute imitation on trees!!:-)

Bob
Admin  
#6 Posted : 15 August 2007 10:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Barrie (Badger) Etter
Reference the latex conkers - they'll have to be replaced due to the possibility of latex allergies from a potential sufferer!!!!!!
Back to the drawing board.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 15 August 2007 13:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By holmezy
Rob,
you are surely not suggesting that we could actually grow authentic origional imitation type conkers? What....on trees? Thats just silly! All those prickly outer cases, having to throw sticks up to dislodge them, the risk of falling objects ( stick and conker) hitting someones head, encouraging small children to climb trees and the risk of falls, not to mention that horrible brown stain that you get on your hands from opening too many conkers.....just plain daft! No, we should all be trying to make the world a safer place and the new "conker" does just that. Never get "being safe" and "having fun" mixed up, they are 2 completely different concepts and should never be combined.

Barrie,

read again...that problem has already been designed out with the impact resistant and shatterproof outer layer. Even the hole for the string is moulded in so there's no risk of stab or puncture wounds when drilling or scewering the conker. As far as I can see the only draw back is that it makes a game of conkers go on,,,and on,,,and on,,,and on.......


Holmezy

(I'm sure its not Friday,,,is it)
Admin  
#8 Posted : 15 August 2007 14:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Lilian McCartney
If IOSH is sponsor does this mean that IOSH members can't compete????

Lilian
Admin  
#9 Posted : 15 August 2007 14:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
Holmzey

Without breakage however they are a potential projectile of some magnitude. Surely the risk of a 25-50mm ball hitting a child and causing serious injury is far greater than throwing sticks and jumping on prickly outer cases put together. Climbing trees is not solely limited to genuine imitation conkers, it relates to cherries, pears, apples and all manner of fruit - perhaps 5 a day is not so healthy after all!!!

Environmentally as well your real substitute will cause major climatological changes and use of scarce resources. My genuine imitation substitutes would absorb CO2 and be self replicating.

Bob
Admin  
#10 Posted : 15 August 2007 14:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman
IOSH members, even CMIOSH and CSP grades, may compete but they would have to declare a financial interest. Any prizes will come out of our subscriptions.

Whatever. I think that sponsoring the competition is a brilliant idea. So long as NOBODY does a Risk Assessment.

But I would strongly reccomend that every member of IOSH acts to have a Tree Preservation Order (TPO) placed on every conker tree (common horse chestnut, Aesculus hippocastanum) in their district.

Merv
Admin  
#11 Posted : 15 August 2007 14:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By holmezy
Lilian,

The idea of IOSH, or any other safety organisation entering a team is just a non starter. There's no suggestion that IOSH members would have any unfair advantage or be looked upon more favourably in the draw, with an easier route to the final. The idea of so many safety professionals all gathered in one place, having a good time and enjoying themselves would be just too much for the general public and press to handle. On the day of the competition I intend to sit in a quiet room and read a book. I do not intend to allow myself to get drawn into participating in such a dangerous sport, and if it isn't classified as dangerous, it jolly well ought to be.

Rob,

Yes, you've got a point re the solid projectile theory. I've spoken to the designers and they have come up with a plan to produce authentic imitation comkers out of a sponge type material to cut down on the weight issue, so any impact injury would be avoided, (and also solve any manual handling issues that would surely have been raised by the press).

I think we are finally getting there.

Holmezy

(oh and Friday is getting closer by the second)
Admin  
#12 Posted : 15 August 2007 15:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Mitchell
This is exactly the sort of off-the-wall thinking that may just start to counteract the anti-safety hysteria! Good luck to the competitors!

What's the prize money like? I may try and win my subscription back!!!
Admin  
#13 Posted : 15 August 2007 15:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Barrie (Badger) Etter
Holmzey
Allowing for redesign, re my previous comments, I know of a lass who breaks out in a rash plus breathing difficulties if she walks into a room where ANY form of latex has been wafted about prviously. Use of laxatives ... I mean latex alternatives required.

Merv
TPO good idea but need to get tree surgeons on the job first to make sure they haven't been affected by the fungus that's blighting them presently. No tree, nowhere to hang you imatation conkers.

Badger
Admin  
#14 Posted : 15 August 2007 16:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
Holmzey

I did think of the infinite improbability drive being fitted as standard on my new genuine imitation substitute. However the most improbable result that would keep happening is that someone is hurt by it and gets 3 bruised fingers. With your foam the drive would definitively give the answer that decapitation was the most improbable outcome and would therefore happen.:-) It seems that the more improbable the result of injury then the drive would make it more likely to happen. Thus all efforts at safety are doomed to die on the fire of improbability!!!

Roll on Saturday

Bob
Admin  
#15 Posted : 15 August 2007 16:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By NSO
Perhaps a good reason for a GM crop. Grown without the prickly, bitter tasting outer shell. All at low level where they could be picked avoiding the obligatory launching of sticks and branch shaking.

Admin  
#16 Posted : 15 August 2007 16:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By holmezy

Badger,

Good point. I like the way you are thinking. We obviously must consider the whole process in terms of risk and risk aversion. Is it ethical to make the sport of conkers safe, without considering the cultivation of the essential equipment. Why should tree surgeons be subjected to risk? Lets make authentic imitation conker trees as well. We could make them about 6ft tall with branches that are easily accessible to fix, at a height of 3-4ft, and remove the authentic imitational conkers.
The tree surgeons could then retrain as topiarists or bonsai-ists (if there is such a word?)and work from ground level. WOW, we're a clever bunch when we get our heads together.

Got to be a good thing and a positive advancement in terms of safety, plus everyones happy!!

Holmezy

My authentic imitation conkers are polished and ready to go, now where do I get an entry form?

roll on Friday, its been a long week!!
Admin  
#17 Posted : 15 August 2007 16:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Anne Smart
Dear all,

The official announcement about our sponsorship of the World Conker Championships has just been posted in the news centre.
More details about our involvement will follow within the next few weeks. If you want to enter, you need to get your forms in quickly before all the places are snapped up. Click on www.worldconkerchampionships.com for entry information.

Anne Smart, IOSH media and campaigns co-ordinator
Admin  
#18 Posted : 15 August 2007 16:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By holmezy

Since I first responded to this thread,and descended into the non sensical, I have been "holding my breath", ,,,,not literally you understand,,,fully expecting a moderator to lock the thread, but the first posting from the IOSH team is information about entry!! Great, I applaud you all and especially IOSH. I also apologise to any purists, but I do think its good to laugh (at ourselves??) from time to time.

Now, what about a computer generated conker competition where no real or authentic imitation conkers are harmed?

Holmezy

Admin  
#19 Posted : 15 August 2007 16:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Anne Smart
Holmezy (and anyone else thinking of entering the championships),

I should probably tell you that you can't enter the competition using your own conkers - Ashton Conker Club supply them all ready-laced to ensure fair play.

'Authentic imitation conkers' won't be allowed - sorry! It's all about the technique anyway.

Anne Smart, IOSH media and camapigns co-ordinator
Admin  
#20 Posted : 16 August 2007 08:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
So we now need some genuine imitation substitute procedures that look like the real techniques but ensure that the genuine imitation conkers are used in aaccordance with the real rules and techniques.

Perhaps Holmzey is right - We need a Fringe championship organised to enlighten the serious heavyweights in the main championship itself.

Bob
Admin  
#21 Posted : 16 August 2007 11:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman
To be reallyreally fringe you would have to substitute water (sterilised/filtered/demineralised) filled non-latex balloons for those dangerouse conkers.

Merv
Admin  
#22 Posted : 16 August 2007 12:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rebecca Donaldson
Its no Friday but may make you smile!

Having instigated a (adult only) Conker Bash (some years ago in our local entertainment hall AKA the Royal Oak!) we took some safety measures.
1. Conkers were only taken from the ground on the Friday pm (after some one shouted 'last orders please ladies and gents')
2. In the cold light of the morning we carefully put holes in the conkers (well those how were feeling up to it!)
3. 12" toughened bail twine was in place (with double granny knots each side)

We arranged the hall (well smoking lounge as it was then!) with pedestrian safety in mind (by the wall away from the route to the Bar)
The stage was set, the arranged hour was upon us, the only thing not accounted for was the increased competitive spirit (known as brandy/gin) by those taking part, and the increased intake of the host's form of hydration celabration(liquid beer etc)given to those who won a round.
The result
one champion with 1 tooth missing and bleeding knuckles

The moral to this long story
My IOSH husband member will be staying at home for this event, even if the prize money covers next years membership!I am sure it will not cover the dentist bill.

Bee

P.S I had a good day out, so all was not lost!
Admin  
#23 Posted : 16 August 2007 13:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By steve e ashton
before anyone else asks.

No, I do not run a conker club.

But if I did, I would have to charge competitors for all the quality controls on the conkers supplied, not to mention the MEWP hire costs and etc...

Nearly Friday?

Steve (Ashton)
Admin  
#24 Posted : 16 August 2007 14:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By holmezy


Rebecca,

now you have me worried. I've read your report and noted the injuries sustained during a previous conker competition.Even though the new design of conker should reduce potential injury, by very fact that it has happened before with the loss of teeth and grazed knuckles, there is a high liklehood it will happen again. After consulting with my insurers and legal advisors, I am going to err on the side of caution, and withdraw my entry from the competition. I cannot imagine why anyone would want to expose themselves to such a risk laden activity. Instead I intend to take up the gentile sport of tiddlywinks.I saw Robbie Coltrane on the telly last night participating. There were bits of sharp plastic flying every where and.....get this,,,he wasn't wearing eye protection. Obviously no one had warned him about the risks of eye injury or repetitive strain injuries, either that or he was just being plain rebellious. Its a full face helmet for me, and wrist supports......

Now, do you tiddle or wink first?

Holmezy

(still taking the tablets......twitch)
Admin  
#25 Posted : 16 August 2007 14:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rebecca Donaldson
Holmezy

The English Tiddlywinks Association may be able to help
www.etwa.org

Rebecca
Admin  
#26 Posted : 16 August 2007 15:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Seano
What a brilliant idea. Any idea how you can enter the competition?

Right, I'm off to finder a conker...
Admin  
#27 Posted : 16 August 2007 15:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By holmezy
Seano,

see Anne's response. Don't get too excited and start buffing up your conkers just yet!
Apparently conkers are provided and they are pre-strung, complete with suitable knots. Its not clear if you get to pick one that especially appeals to you or whether you are allocated a conker on arrival. I'm pretty sure they are all newbies in terms of conker fights, unless of course some have seen battle before and are suitable rated as a "37er" or even "defending champion".

Holmezy

Admin  
#28 Posted : 16 August 2007 16:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Seano
That takes the excitement away from it a bit. But i suppose they supply them to stop cheating. Perhaps i will arrange an in company conkers bonkers championship.
Admin  
#29 Posted : 16 August 2007 16:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Heather Collins
Are "stampsies" allowed in the official rules? For the uninitiated this is where if you let go of the string and your conker goes on the floor, your opponent may stamp on it. Clearly the risk of having your hand stamped on as you dive to retrieve your conker is considerable....
Admin  
#30 Posted : 16 August 2007 16:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By holmezy

Heather,

In the sport of conkers, there is an unwritten set of rules that cover "gentlemanly conduct". It is always the "done thing" to offer to pick up any conker that an opponent has lost grip off, and to give it a cursory wipe with ones handkerchief, before returning it in an apologetic manner. The game can then recommence.
The practise of stamping on an oponents dropped conker, or "stampsies" as you rightly called it derived during an unofficial tounament, which was not governed by the Conker Club Of Great Britain, and as such the tounanment descended into a bit of an "anything goes" type of affair. This offshoot game has continued to thrive, albeit underground or in unlicensed arenas, but it now offers little resemblence to the origional game. Think of it as a type of Aussie Rule Conker Contest.
Now compare our beloved game of football, with its polite and noble gentlemen participants,with the Aussie rules football, with its totally different proceedures and often violent playing techniques. Its similar with the conker game.

So, no,,,,,,stampsies will not be allowed. Shame on you.

Holmezy

(really should get some therapy, never mind it is Friday tomorrow)
Admin  
#31 Posted : 16 August 2007 16:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
I always thought the gentlemanly thing to do was to round up the conker, when it drops to the floor, with some large pliers or a handy Nutcracker and then hand it back. Shucks the world has moved on.

Bob:-)
Admin  
#32 Posted : 17 August 2007 08:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ray Hurst
Lots of good ideas here, but the main point surely is, all you need is......A cunning plan.

Ray Hurst
IOSH President Elect
Admin  
#33 Posted : 17 August 2007 08:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By holmezy

Ray,

although I am not an expert in the art of conkering, (although the drivel I have been spouting lately may lead some to beleive the opposite is true),,,,,,
I can inform you that every "conkerer" goes into each tournament with a plan. Whether its a cunning one or not, is undecided. Conkering is not just about "giving it a good wallop". There are specific weak spots on every conker, the trick is to work out where they are and then plan your attack taking into consideration factors such as trajectory, angles, velocity, point of impact, wind conditions and humidity to name a few.
Experienced "conkerers", or "Williams" as they are known within the sport, have the knack of identifying their opponents weakness and shamelessly exploiting them.

Holmezy

Now its Friday....let the games begin!!
Admin  
#34 Posted : 17 August 2007 09:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Edward Shyer
My great uncle William was the best conkeror known. Twenties were no problem for him in fact although not the world champion he certainly went far with his conkering skills.

In fact one opponent was heard to say were is the health and safety man when you want one. This was just before he he collapsed with a fatal conkering injury to the eye.

Regards

Ted
Admin  
#35 Posted : 17 August 2007 10:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By holmezy
Ted,

nice to hear from you again. Thought you were more of a fisherman rather than a conkerer?

I beleive the occasion you are referring to was the European Conker Championships of 1066, that were held in Hastings? If I am correct, then this was the only time that the title, King of Conkers, was won by a foriegner? I beleive that, although William was English, he had spent a bit of time working in France and had gained citizenship and thus competed under the French flag, even though he was actually English? Typically, when he became champion, we (the English) then claimed him as our own and found him a cushy number back in blighty running the country. King William the Conkerer, to give him his proper title defended his title successfully for about 11 years or so. I think the French then got mardy and decided not to enter the competition again. In later years, the Germans did enter a token effort, and although they made it to the final rounds, did not manage to be victorious. I think a bloke called Churchill beat them in the final of 1946?
And also, that tragic eye injury in 1066 gave rise to the modern day "Conker Risk Assessment Proceedure" which is known by its initials, and is what I have been talking about in this topic from the start. Since then, there have been no reported lost time injuries in the sport so in a way William was the fore father of Health and Safety in Conkers

Ever since then, the English have continued to claim victorious foreigners as their own, for example Greg Resedski in the girly game of tennis, Kevin Pieterson in the pastime of cricket

If he realy is your great uncle, then you must be very old.

Holmezy

Soon be the weekend....beer time!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.