Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kevin Fitzgerald
Dear Colleagues,
I have a piece of equipment that was manufactured pre 1995 and does not carry a CE mark. Am I required to have it CE marked if it pre dates the original machinery directive?
Any help is appreciated?
Kevin.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By JGRL
No, it doesn't need to be CE marked pre 1995 Kevin, however it should meet PUWER 98.
If you have made significant modifications since 1995 then it may need to CE marked around those modifications.
You can e-mail me re any other issues about the machine if you want.
Regards
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By JGRL
Sorry Ron but you are 100% wrong in with that comment.
If you have a machine either pre 1995 or even after that particular date then you must go through the CE marking process whether you supply to others, build for your own use, or even make significant modifications. For example if a machine is already CE marked and you make those mods e.g. machine to run faster or differently then you would need to go through the CE marking process again.
Regards
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Heather Collins
Sorry JGRL I disagree. Making a machine run faster is not a suufficient mod to require CE certification on a machine that did not previously have it. The main legislation applying here would be PUWER, which would require a risk assessment.
The previous poster is also quite right that it DOES depend on where the machine is now. If an old machine with no CE mark is imported into the EEA for the first time, it DOES require CE marking and all the other relevant legal requirements as though it were new.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter
Phew! I give some general pointers on what was a fairly vague enquiry and I'm 100% wrong?!!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Heather Collins
No Ron, I think what you said was 100% correct but I was trying to be polite....
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter
My response aimed at JGRL. Thanks for your support Heather.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By JGRL
Heather, You are correct in saying that when a machine enters the EU for the first time that it would need to be CE marked whether old or new. I didn't suggest otherwise.
However, when a machine that has been overhauled or reconditioned outside must be regarded as being placed on the market and put into service for the first time, therefore CE marking and EC decleration of conformity applies.
The point at which the machine becomes 'new' depends on the particular circumstances of each case but in the opinion of the UK authorities it becomes new if the reconditioning changes the specification of the product, the nature of the hazards or increases the levels of risk associated with machinery. Clearly, a machine that runs faster or functions differently can change the nature of the hazards. So, I disagree with you on that one.
If the machine in question here is reconditioned and is moved on then CE marking does apply and the machine is treated as new. If not, then PUWER 98 applies.
Regards
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kevin Fitzgerald
All,
Many thanks for your (lively) responses to date.
To summarise it would seem;
1. If the equipment is pre 1995 it does not have to be CE marked but does need to risk assessed under PUWER.
2.If it is pre 1995 but brought in from outside the EU it does need to be CE marked as if new.
3.If there were modifications made to the machine in the meantime it then needs to be CE marked.
Have I left anything out?
Finally does anyone know where I may get a good summary or guidelines on CE marking requirements for machinery?
Regards,
Kevin.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mitch
I would check the specifics of your 3) 'significant' alteration or refurbishment comes to mind. As to your last request in my experience there is no good guidance or summaries available in CE marking
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By JGRL
Try FAQ's The Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regs 1995 from the DTI.
It is very good.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Heather Collins
Actually JGRL you did disagree with the point about machinery coming from outside the EEA. Ron made the point in his original response that it depended what country the machine was in and you said he was "100% wrong"!
With regard to increasing the speed of a machine requiring a review of CE marking. It's clearly incorrect to say that this will always be the case. I agree that there MAY be circumstances under which this MAY change the functioning of the machine sufficiently to require a review of the CE requirements but I would suggest that as the guarding is likely to remain the same, this is not generally likely to require any such thing.
As an example, we recently had a number of machines refurbished to increase their efficiency by increasing their operating speed. This did not in any way change the original safety functionality and so there were no requirements relating to CE marking. Even the PUWER re-assessment was only minor.
I think we sometimes get far too hung up on whether a CE mark is needed or not and forget that the most important issue is whether the machine is actually safe to use. Believe me, a CE mark is no guarantee of that!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By kate brown
At what point do the ESR of the Supply of Machinery regs come into play here?
I have heard talk of a machine manufactured pre 1995 having to comply with half of the ESR's of the Supply of Machinery Regs and not all.
I am not sure of the exact context this was discussed in and have not researched this myself yet - just thought some one on here might be able so shed some light.
Thanks,
K
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Heather Collins
Kate
The ESRs come into play at the same time as the requirement for CE marking. Any transitional provisions that did not require full compliance have long since ceased to apply. If the Regs apply under the particular circumstances then they apply in total.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By kate brown
Thanks Heather,
Do you have info on what the transissions periods were or where I could best find this info in summary?
Would be useful for my background knowledge....
Thanks again,
K
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jim Walker
If you have a "search forums" you will find I've said many times do not trust a CE mark; new, ten years old, whatever: it makes no difference.
You must do a PUWER check -assuming you are competent (the danger being, you don't know what you don't know!).
To be topical - all those Mattel toys were CE marked.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.