Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 20 September 2007 12:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By holmezy

Hi Folks,

need your help...

I'm looking for examples of accidents or prosecutions that are related to people working excessive hours then driving, or driving for excessive hours. I seem to remember a recent case re a kitchen fitting firm whos boss used to make his staff work daft hours then drive??? Also, the chap who drove of a bridge and caused an accident?

Help gratefully recieved>

Holmezy
Admin  
#2 Posted : 20 September 2007 13:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By peter gotch
Hi Holmezy

Google for "Great Heck" should get you the M62 incident.

The other one was in a relatively recent Practitioner so you might find it at SHPOnline.

Good luck. P
Admin  
#3 Posted : 20 September 2007 13:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Garry Homer
One is known as the Great Heck Rail Disaster. This was where a guy was jailed for allegedly falling asleep at the wheel of his land rover that left the M62 and landed on the rail tracks in front of a goods train. The land rover derailed the train and the next passenger train ran into the derailed goods train.

Some sleep expert calmed we all should not drive unless we have had at least 7 hours of uninterrupted sleep. No doubt it was this testimony that jailed the chap. By this standard I should never drive!

A good advert for the strength of a land rover.

There was an inquiry into the standard of protection provided at bridges but the official view was there was no question to answer. You will now noticed a large number of bridges have more protection around them!

Garry
Admin  
#4 Posted : 20 September 2007 14:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Cross
holmezy

I think the case you are looking for is the Court of Appeal case of Eyres v Atkinsons Kitchens and Bedrooms. The full report is available at this link:
http://www.bailii.org/ew...s/EWCA/Civ/2007/365.html
Admin  
#5 Posted : 20 September 2007 16:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart Hamilton
Here is another one that might help

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/...mbridgeshire/5088636.stm

Also I am sure there was a similar case in Fife, but can't remember to mauch detail on it

Stuart
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.