Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 15 October 2007 09:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By songwriter
Can you please tell me who is reponsible for Agency drivers being trained, if he has an ADR but has not worked for anyone so therefore has minimum experience and starts working for our company for 3 days and has an accident. Is it the agency's responsibility or ours. thank you in advance.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 15 October 2007 10:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Glyn Atkinson
In my opinion, yours!

Any contract worker should really only be accecpted to work on your premises if you feel that they are capable of performing their work safely.

That would take account of any external training record, experience gained with other companies, or not as the case may be.

Replace the agency tag with new starter, employed by you.

What training and awareness would you give that person?

Did you give the same to the agency worker, if not, why not?

Same tasks, same work location, only difference probably is pay scale amounts and tenure of employment.

He walks through your door to work, and you now have duty of care to maintain a safe system of working, including any on site training requirements that you feel would be necessary to prevent accidents or injuries from his normal work practice.

Very close to my heart at the moment as we have to sort out agency FLT drivers on a fairly regular basis for our sites, and we have to prove full control of their abilities and safety to our insurers and our co-workers.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 15 October 2007 10:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brian Welch
I support the views of Gyln, and having just had and agency FLT driver incur a near miss, the investigation focussed very much on our ensuring the individuals competency and training prior to allowing use of FLT's on our premises.

Perhaps the only additionally comment would be not to forget Risk Assessments, which will identify mitigations such as SSW of PPE. Etc

Brian


Admin  
#4 Posted : 15 October 2007 11:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GARRY WIZZ
You carry the can. You are the employer,

Garry
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.