Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 15 October 2007 12:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bill Elliott
Does anyone out there have a tried an tested system for uniquely identifying slings used for patient hoisting. I am particularly interested in a means of marking that will withstand laundering and will not affect the integrity of the slings and will link the slings to the hoists that they can be used on, bearing in mind that not all slings will work on all hoists.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 15 October 2007 16:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Dowan
Try Scaftag , they may well have a product which you can use
Dave
Admin  
#3 Posted : 15 October 2007 20:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Saracen11
Hi Bill. All slings have laundry proof labels attached - this will identify the sling itself, prompting the staff to marry it up with the correct type of hoist - a training issue? If the labels have degraded to the point of being illegible, I suspect you need to revise your cleaning regimes i.e. temperature and detergents as the slings would have been designed to withstand these actions.

To answer your question though, in my experience, the loops and stitching on slings is colour coded e.g. small/medium/large = green/red/blue... so any other means of identification shouldn't be necessary?

Regards
Admin  
#4 Posted : 16 October 2007 10:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By stephen williamson
Hi Bill,

We've just gone with Arjo's own system with an electronic tag inserted into the seam and a visible unique tag. It ain't cheap, but allied to a bit of prior publicity to make sure the things are available for periodic inspection and (increasingly difficult) update training for staff about usage it gives us some peace of mind.

Hope this is helpful,

Cheers,

Steve
Admin  
#5 Posted : 16 October 2007 11:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight
Hi Folks,

Very interested in all this; we have a similar problem and the best we've come up with is marking with an indelible pen. Does Arjo's system compromise tissue viability at all? All the tags we've seen so far have been scratchy, which is an absolute non-starter for us in our field,

John
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.