Rank: Guest
|
Posted By JWG
Advice please. I'm currently carrying out a risk assessment on first aid arrangement for a new training building we have.
It is a low risk environment, no public, there are two floors, 12 training rooms and offices, a library, and a lecture theatre. When the lecture theatre is empty there is approx 40 staff max.
The lecture theatre has a capacity of 100 (may only be at that capacity for 1 hour a week, but approx 40 staff 1-3 hours per day)
So potentially the most there will be 140 staff in the building, but this is very rare.
After reviewing HSE's guidance, I'm reluctant to provide the first aid cover suggested (2 first aiders at any one time) when it is rare that there will be more than 100 staff.
Any suggestions or comments are gratefully welcome.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
100 or so staff at a time ? Plus maybe 50 odd trainees ?
Two trained first aiders may seem excessive to you but you really have to ensure total coverage. Who is off training, sick or on holiday ? Who covers ?
And, a very important point for me - males/females.
Men very rarely protest about their "vital signs" being checked by a female first aider. But some ladies do not appreciate being touched by a male who is not their "significant other" (and, though I don't like saying it, you have to think religion)
(May the minotaurs permit a brief, four asterisk expletive here ?) how much does it cost to train a first aider ? and how much could immediate care of an injury save the company ?
Stop
I could on for three days. And I frequently do.
Merv
Keep a balance.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alan Nicholls
It is also wise to remember that First Aiders are for ill health as well as injuries. Do you know or ask all students if they suffer from any health problems that may require medical assistance?
I work in a small engineering company, offices on 2 floors,main workshop, 4 test areas, assembly shop, strip and clean shop, electronic assembly and test areas,canteen,goods delivery yard,stores/dispatch. We have at the last count 11 qualified first aiders, sadly I am not one of them. We have just over 300 employees and growing again.
2 people 4days training, What's the problem?
Regards Alan N
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Brian Welch
Melv has some valid points in his arguments / views. I actively encourage staff to train as 1st aiders, and the company offers additional incentives to promote volunteers. The depot works 24/7 and has approximately 150 employees / subcontractors. About 15 employees are trained 1st aiders including management, white collar and shop floor staff, this allow adequate cover 24/7. I would not refuse any additional volunteers without good reason.
Brian
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Clive Lowery
JWG,
Sorry mate but I'm with Merv on this. The more First Aiders from differing backgrounds/cultures the better.
Sad as it is we live in a claims culture that will seek to gain as much as it can.
You may well be required to stand up in court and explain why you went against guidance/ACOPs and try and prove you were right!
If it is merely a matter of budget/finance then put it in your documented RA and let the bean counters over-rule you or not.
Harsh but sadly true.
Personally I would follow the HSE Guidelines and quote them in your documented First Aid RA.
Good luck,
Clive
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Putt
There is an abundance of 0ne day emergency aid/appointed persons courses available, so if you don't feel they all have to be 4 day FAW trained, that's an option.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By garyh
All very well but my experience is that people are unwilling to beocome 1st aiders!
The obvious thing is to do a **risk assessment** (this of coutrse solves all of you problems!) How close are you to medical assistance (eg how long for attendance by ambulance - this makes a difference).
I would put up notices, raise it at safety committee etc and ask who is interested in 1st aid / AP. If you have plenty volunteers this will help you.
Agree with the point about cover though - even if you decide to only have 1 1st aider you need cover, maybe APs as last resort?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tabs
As a very experienced first aider, I would point out that having trained help is often very appreciated.
Your first aider will hopefully be little-used but when they are, it could be a matter of life and death. CPR is extremely tiring in real life and a second pair of hands is a God send.
Second opinions are always a bonus too.
First aiders are also susceptible to injury and illness... if you only have one, what do they do for help?
Finally, a small, but significant amount of accidents will involve more than one casualty.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Taff2
JWG
For me, you are doing the "sensible" thing, you're doing a risk assessment - you deem it a low risk environment:
no public,
there are two floors, 12 training rooms and offices, a library, and a lecture theatre - so a small "one site facility"
When the lecture theatre is empty there is approx 40 staff max & occasionally 1 hour a week - you'll have another 100 sitting in a lecture theatre.
One first aider should suffice - yes it would be nice (even if not practicable cost/volunteers) to have 2 - but I do not recall the law stating that the first aider must be on site every time you have one person there, they are allowed holidays
The only thing I would do, more that your current plan, is to check around - do you have other employers / facilities in the vicinity / close proximity and if so, could you come to an arrangement with them for sharing a first aider during lecture time / holidays.
Hope this is sensible advice
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Merv Newman
Coming back to this. Yesterday and today I have visited a 150 employee engine rebuilding plant. (crapped out engines rebuilt to "new" standards)
They have a full-time occupational nurse (not a legal requirement) who part times as a safety coordinator. (just for the fun of it)
She, Marie, as a qualified first aid trainer has trained 50 (30 odd %) of the employees as first aiders. Including the lady who wears a full Burka in the office and is not allowed to touch a male person.
Should I have a heart attack during our next training session then, statistically, there will be someone in the room who can preserve my life.
I'll go for that.
JWG - think about it.
Merv
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Derek Singleton
I provide first Aiders over 10 sites, 7 days per week. All sites have varying numbers of visitors. We take into account all those visitors and also consider annual leave , sickness etc.
So my advice would be take in to consideration all your visitors and base your requirement on the maximum number. Ensure you have cover for those days you think you have a first aider on duty but....
In the end you must bite the bullet and train some up, its not that expensive.
Derek Singleton
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By GARRY WIZZ
I will second dave putt, good answer for a low risk area.
Garry
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul Duell
I'm sometimes the only first aider in my workplace, which inspires me to add...
What if it's me that's hurt / ill?
I'd always recommend more than one first aider. If you shop around, you can sometimes get training for a group at your own premises for nearly the same cost as single training elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48
I wonder, where one has many first aiders in a low risk environment, how frequently they actually get to use/practise their skills?
I would find being a "first aider" in such circumstances remarkably stressful; lots of responsibility and lots to remember in the moments after that phone call, and maybe it's some years since I did that training.
Where you have lots of first aiders, do you run regular practice drills like you do for fire evacs?
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.