Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 05 November 2007 21:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Emma Forbes
I may be well off the track here but were the former Abrasive Wheels Regulations of a "as far as is reasonably practicale" status and then superceded by PUWER which has "practicable" status?

Are there any former statutes that have changed status from reasonably practicable to practicable?

TIA.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 05 November 2007 22:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
They were actually absolute "every dangerous part must be guarded" originally, until the law permitted an exemption allowing part to be exposed to do work at this point they became practicable. PUWER has dropped the standard in my view as there is a school of thought that argues an assessment of risk can be made.

Bob
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.