Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 30 November 2007 16:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JonB
Hi,

There is a heated debate ongoing at my workplace regarding asbestos surveying and CDM, namely is an asbestos survey a "site survey" or is it an "inspection" or defined as construction works, given that a type 3 asbestos survey requires intrusive investigation.

In essence do they fall within CDM or outwith CDM, any thoughts would be appreciated.

Jon
Admin  
#2 Posted : 30 November 2007 16:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter
The legal definition of construction work within the CDM Regulations specifically excludes site surveys.
You can view the definition within the Statutory Instrument at the opsi website.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 30 November 2007 16:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis
I go with Ron on this except if it is undertaken within the site investigation programme. I then tie it all together as one project, whether or not it is notifiable.

Bob
Admin  
#4 Posted : 01 December 2007 15:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Granville Jenkins
I would suggest that the requirement to follow CDM 2007 will depend on the type of survey that you are proposing to carry out i.e. a type 1 survey is non-intrusive and consists of a site walkabout and assumptions are made whether or not any material or components contain asbestos(and generally speaking a type 1 survey is not worth the paper its written on - and it is unlikely that the requirements of Part 2(4) Duty to Manage asbestos in non-domestic premises of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006(CAR2006)would be met), a type 2 survey is only slightly intrusive, small samples are taken of any suspect material and sent for analysis - a type 2 survey would meet the requirements of CAR2006. On a personal note I arranged for a type 2 survey to be carried out on a number of properties and the resulting reports have provided an excellent source of reference both for projects and staff queries. A type 3 survey is as intrusive as it gets and would include opening up works to access the suspect area/material and would only be carried out where there is either going to be demolition of a building or major refurbishment.

Getting back on track the CDM 2007 Regulations apply to all construction projects and includes maintenance and repairs the only differential is whether or not the project is notifiable.
A type 1 survey would not fall under the CDM regulations as there is no 'construction work' being carried out - a type 2 survey is only marginally intrusive and samples would be taken during unoccupied periods - a type 3 would definitely fall within CDM as serious'construction work' will likely need to be carried out to 'open up' the building.

However, within the scheme of things there would be a need to consider the requirements of Section 3 of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 which places a responsibility on the dutyholder to carry out suitable and sufficient risk assessments. You could then find that a whole batch of other Regulations come into play, for example - 'Provision and Use of Work Equipment', 'Work at Height Regulations', 'Confined Spaces Regulations', 'PPE Regs' . . . and the job hasn't even started!!

Regards
Granville
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.