Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Heathrow Good morning, has anyone else come accross this substance? We've sourced it from three diferent companys and each msds has conflicting advice despite the same composition - any advice ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Karen Todd AdBlue is urea solution, in your particular application is employed as a reductant in Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR).
Urea solution is injected into the exhaust gas from diesel engines to reduce NOx emissions.
Some reduction in particulate matter emissions will also observed even if no particulate trap is fitted.
Fuel has to be ULSD to prevent degradation of the catalyst.
Bottled ammonia gas can also be used as a reductant but urea is favoured due to its lower health and safety risks.
Amongst others, industrial uses of urea include:-
· Component of fertilizer and animal feed-cheap source of fixed nitrogen
· Alternative to rock salt for deicing roads/runways
· Ingredient in hair conditioners, facial cleaners, bath oils, lotions
· A flame proofing agent
From the supplied MSDS I had (when used properly according to directions), the following is noted:-
Product is not classified according to EU legislation, i.e. no risk phrases product not defined as hazardous waste no adverse health effects product not expected to harm environment If a spill occurs; in soils, urea degrades rapidly, usually within 24 hours. Ultimate degradation products are carbon dioxide and ammonia.
In water, biodegradation to carbon dioxide and ammonia is the major fate pathway.
Urea is non-toxic to aquatic organisms, bioaccumulation of urea is also extremely low.
If urea is being dispensed from a pump system similar to that employed for diesel fuel, problems should not arise during normal usage.
To prevent potential spills, it may be prudent to site bulk urea storage tank above ground in a bunded area.
Chemical usage on any site, should consider implications of COSHH regulations and undertake a site specific risk assessment (if necessary), although this should result in a very low risk situation prevailing with no specific control measures identified.
However, on the MSDS Section 10 I had: Stability and Reactivity-Urea reacts with calcium- and sodium hypochlorite forming EXPLOSIVE nitrogen trichloride (reacts with air)-also highly reactive or incompatible with oxidizing materials, acids and alkalis.
If the bulk container used for urea storage is to be cleaned, careful selection and usage of cleaning materials is essential.
KT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Heathrow Many thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By TK I've just recently done a COSHH assessment on it.
Let me know if you want a copy.
Thomas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Heathrow My big problem is we have 1000 litre IBCs of this stuff - its not the nastiest substance around - but bad enough - and I would like it bunded from both H&S and an environmental perspective. The boss doesn't see it this way - any killer facts please people ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By TK The MSDS I have says:
"Avoid contamination with oxidising agents or strong acids as ignition may result."
You could argue segregation is necessary particularly if you have other incompatible substances on site.
Also spilled product may cause slippage. Best to contain to prevent spills rather than wait for inevitable falls.
Lastly you'd say what your drainage set up is but any unauthorised discharge could land you in trouble.
Thomas
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.