Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 14 December 2007 15:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Eastbourne
Afternoon

Wonder if you could help?

When I started my current job it was on the understanding that I undertake the NEBOSH Dipoma Level 6 which they would pay for in order to become the organisations "Competent" person.

It took a year and 4 months but I am now taking the Diploma. To be honest, the timing could have been better, work has been a nightmare, plus moving out plus making marriage arrangements has left little time for revision and studying.

However, I hope to successfully finish in July, after all, I have wanted to do the Diploma for about 7 years now.

While attending a lecture, a tutor stated that under Section 9 of the HASAWA employers could not charge us for the course if we left, even if we had signed an agreement.

My issue is, before I took the course I had to sign a piece of paper stating that if I left before two years I would have to pay pay back a certain amount, I think about half. This was not in my original contract of employment but like I said, something I had to sign about a month before I commenced the Diploma.

My query is that under Section 9 it states,

"No employer shall levy or permit to be levied on any employee of his charge in respect of anything done or provided in pursuance of any specific requirements of the relevant statutory provisions."

And as I was to undertake the Diploma level 6 in order to become the "Competent person" under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulatons - Reg 7, if I were to leave, would I legally have to pay back the course fee?

I am just looking at this from a very black and white legal point of view, not a moral one.

Many thanks for your time.

Mark


Admin  
#2 Posted : 14 December 2007 15:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By akm
Mark

I'm sure there's been a similar thread on this ages ago so it might be worth doing a search.

Doing the Diploma doesn't make you 'competent'; just more so than before (or less incompetent!). There's no legal requirement for you to have it. You signed the paperwork so you agreed in contract therefore my gut feeling is tough, you should have got advice before you signed.

You can still leave and lose some of the money in your final pay but I can't see them chasing for the remainder.

I do sympathise with your predicament by the way, its just you wanted a reply in B&W and that's about as clear as I can make it!

All the best
Admin  
#3 Posted : 14 December 2007 15:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve Cartwright
Mark

This is a grey area. Under Section 2 of HSWA employers are required to provide Information, Instruction, Training and Supervision. If your employer made it a requirement of you to do the NEBOSH prior to giving you the job then you would have a very good case.

However if you have requested some training but it was not a requirement of the job, but was a nice to have. Then the company would have a case.

Not many companies persue an ex employ for the money. However if you have signed a document stating you will refund part or all if you leave within a period of time then you can't really complain.

Basically its standard practise and if they are willing to pay for training why do you want to leave? They can't be that bad.

Steve
Admin  
#4 Posted : 14 December 2007 15:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Wilson
I think this section of HASAW was intended for things like PPE, RPE and specific training etc and was never intended for the purposes you mentioned.

So put another way would the HSE / LA serve notice or prosecute your employer for breach of the HASAW in particular Sect 9 if they recovered your fees???
Admin  
#5 Posted : 14 December 2007 15:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh
Consult a lawyer! You can see them under the "1st meeting is free" scheme or some such thing. Or try the Citizen's advice people. If you leave for pastures new and they try to get the costs back from you, I would write to the MD pointing out the iniquity of it all, and do they really want their image to be that of a bullying, grasping bunch of scrooges? In the local newspaper? In the SHP?

If that fails, go to the small claims court and see what happens. (Incidentally are you in a Trades Union? If so ask their advice. If not join one and do the same).

Don't allow yourself to be bullied or harassed over this.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 14 December 2007 15:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By J Knight
I'm with akm and Dave on this; the NEBOSH Dip isn't training provided for the purposes of H&S, as that is about the training you need to do your job safely,

John
Admin  
#7 Posted : 14 December 2007 15:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Breeze
I think this is the thread to which John refers:

http://www.iosh.co.uk/in...iew&forum=1&thread=28708

Hope it is useful in helping you understand the reasoning.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 14 December 2007 15:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Breeze
Sorry for the misattribution there, I meant "akm" and not "John".
Admin  
#9 Posted : 14 December 2007 15:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merlin
Where has commitment gone?
The company has provided training and expense for you, well, show commitment and do the job for them using the skills you have been trained for

If you leave just after qualifying, the company would then think again about spending time and effort on others, and in time refuse to train anyone

I ran a transport company for 20years trained drivers to HGV and enabled them to gain experience all at my expense, all I asked in return is please give commitment to the job and looked for at least two years after the gained the HGV. So why if you leave immediately you qualify why it is unreasonable for the company to ask for their money back

If you only take the job for a short time to gain experience, on the road for a better job and prospects, then do the training at your expense and time

My experience in H/S in ten years I have paid in time and money over £20000 and not expected others to pay, I wanted to be a good H/S manager so I took the time and put in the effort and accepted the expence
Admin  
#10 Posted : 14 December 2007 16:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Eastbourne
Obviously missed the "not a moral response" bit Merlin!?

Many thanks for your replies and the link to the other thread, sorry to have repeated the issue.

Just wanted other professionals opinions and some clarity.

ATVB

Mark
Admin  
#11 Posted : 14 December 2007 16:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merlin
Mark

I did not miss the point, its just that every time I see a question like this 90% of the time is because someone is thinking of moving on to a new job and looking to get out of an agreement, and it gets my blood boiling. I suspect they have just got the first job because the company is willing to pay for training and they have the second job because they have that qualification

When a company pays for training of this nature then the person concerned should give back commitment or the money
Admin  
#12 Posted : 14 December 2007 16:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel

Merlin makes a very good point and I agree with him

As others have said the section referred to was not intended for such areas. Additionally I am sure that there is both contract and employment case law re this very issue and I am sure that the unions have come across this issue many times - take advice there

Under contract law a contract can still be illegal even though both parties have willing signed up together e.g. you can make a contract to break the law but the contract is not legal in a court
Admin  
#13 Posted : 14 December 2007 16:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By peter gotch
It is not a SPECIFIC requirement, therefore Section 9 does NOT apply to this training.

Claw back arrangements for fees are very common practice, often with a new employer ending up paying out a golden handshake.

Regards, Peter
Admin  
#14 Posted : 14 December 2007 16:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Arran Linton - Smith
Sorry Mark, but from a legal point of view I do not think that Section 9 argument will help you in any way, especially in a civil argument.

By all means test it, however in this case it may well be worth assessing the depth of your pockets!

"bee care full win yew ewes spell cheque:?."

- Gary Vert

"The law is the last result of human wisdom acting upon human experience for the benefit of the public."

- Samuel Johnson
Admin  
#15 Posted : 15 December 2007 10:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By maddog RM
Were you already competent when you were taken on by your employer? Did you convince your employer you were competent at the job interview?

Has your role changed/have you been promoted since joining? If so, did you sit down with your employer and agree this was the course to ensure you are trained to the correct level for this new role?

If the training is for personal development and is outside your role remit and you have signed a contract they have got you by the short and curlys.

PS It drives me mad when health and safety professionals refer to themselves as NEBOSH qualified. NEBOSH what? One day manual handling course.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 15 December 2007 12:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Granville Jenkins
I don't suppose that the NEBOSH Diploma comes cheap - besides which most organisations operate similar payback procedures and it becomes a case of 'buyer beware', if you decide you want to move on to greener pastures once you have obtained the diploma, you will need to consider the cost implications!

At the end of the day you signed on the bottom line - no one forced or coerced you into signing and by doing so you accepted your employers terms and conditions and to be fair to your employer they would hope to get some return on their investment.

Regards
Granville
Admin  
#17 Posted : 15 December 2007 13:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Edward Shyer

Was this training included into your contract of employment and if so what were the terms and conditions of this training.

Legally deductions from salary are only permitted by statutory provision generally speaking this would be PAYE, national insurance contributions and attachment of earnings orders and the like or if the employee has consented in writing stating the deduction can be made from their salary.

Check your agreement its wording.

Regards
Ted

Admin  
#18 Posted : 17 December 2007 09:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By ChrisinMalta
Mmmmmm interesting. The question is, was the Diploma training done to help the employer fulfill a statutory duty? The Management Regs require employers to obtain access to a "competent person for h&s". If you can prove that he was attempting to discharge this duty by sending you on the course, then you might have a case!
Regards, Chris
Admin  
#19 Posted : 17 December 2007 14:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jean
I would ask your tutor for case examples.

The company offered you a contract you signed it, and this then nullified any previous contracts. The section you referred to states specific this is is usually taken as PPE etc, manual handling

The contract seems reasonable to me. Personally given the costs of legal actions. I would simply put in your reference. Mark signed an agreement that if the company paid for his diploma training in h & S he would remain with the company for 2 years or pay back an appropriate amount of money. He has refused to do. Due to the potential high legal costs the company has decided not to pursue any legal actions against Mark to recover the costs. This would be factual.

It costs nothing for the first half hour of legal advice. The remainder are about £178 + Vat per hour.

A good solicitor if you take all the relevant paperwork will be able to tell you whether you should just pay up.
Admin  
#20 Posted : 18 December 2007 16:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Eastbourne
Hi

Sorry to reply and bring this post to the top again but just wanted to say thanks for all your responses, I read all with interest.

I agree with most and that is if you make the committment then you shold really see it through, it is after all, just good form.

But from a legal black and white point of view I am sill undecided, I feel that just because section 9 has been used to provide employees with free PPE does not mean that this simply is the case, I would doubt that the HASAWA would be so prescriptive.

From my own perspective, it was stated that it is a condition of my employment that I undergo this training to become the Competent person in accordance with reg 7 of the Management regs. I understand that each case may be different.

I am not a selfish person and will no doubt see my committment through, despite the inevitable headache I will have had by then from banging my head on the walls for two years.

Hope everyone has a great Christmas!

Mark



Admin  
#21 Posted : 18 December 2007 19:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jean
I wish you the same Mark. How about taking the free half hour from a solicitor who specialises in health and safety law, and then tell the rest of us what the legal eagles would would say. Ask them for cases that we can look up.

Oh, and it isn't selfish attempting to get opinions on this site. This is what this site is meant to be about.

Jean
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.