Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 18 December 2007 10:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert.
Is there any benefit, from a safety reporting point of view, of recording and tracking "hours booked" sick leave?
Or is this an HR function?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 18 December 2007 11:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel

If it is work related it should be recorded as: -

This info is being asked for re *Bid's
*Insurance quotes
* General KPI's

and if H&S produces figures etc it strengthens the H&S position e.g. we are involved - leaving it dilutes the H&S position

HR do not have stats re agency staff

HR do not always want to capture/ can capture all areas so some work related absence can be dropped off therefore managers are managing without knowledge
Admin  
#3 Posted : 18 December 2007 11:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brenda H
I record sick leave when it's through a work related accident/incident and record lost time attributed towards the incident
Admin  
#4 Posted : 18 December 2007 12:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert.
Thanks folks.

NOT WORK RELATED ABSENCES.

WRAs are picked through our safety reporting.

I'm talking about coughs splutters, sunday night food poisoning, sports injuries, self certification, etc, etc etc.
What is the benefit of recording that?
Admin  
#5 Posted : 18 December 2007 12:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Shillabeer
It seems to me that you are straying into an area which is in my opinion best avoided. If the absence is as a direct result of a health and safety issue or accident (in the wider sense) let HR deal with sicknes in the normal way and don't get involved. If the sickness absence (what an erronous term, I don't like the term sicknes absence or sick leave, it sounds like an entitlement to go sick not an unfortunate one).

Let HR report on sickness and consentrate on accidents which cause sickness absence, that way you keep your independence, let theHR manager worry about the sick lame and lazy bit of this.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 18 December 2007 13:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert.
Thanks Bob. That's how I look at it.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 18 December 2007 13:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Linda Westrupp
It sounds to me as if someone is trying to interpret the 'Health' part of Health and Safety in a much wider sense than H&S Professionals would in order to get you to do something which is really an HR job.
I would throw it back as a personnel issue
Good luck
Linda
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.