Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 08 January 2008 07:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sharon
There is controversy over the health risks, and debate over whether there has been sufficient control over the use of Wi-Fi in the classrooms.


http://www.teachingexper...-benefits-and-risks-2362
Admin  
#2 Posted : 08 January 2008 08:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Garry Homer
Wi-Fi devices are well within the ICNIRP guidelines by factors of thousands so why should there be any concerns?

Is concern being drummed up by those who have services to sell?

Garry
Admin  
#3 Posted : 08 January 2008 10:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Merchant
First off, the article is from last July so it's hardly news. "WiFi is scary. The Loch Ness monster is scary. We don't actually know anything about either of them, but we once saw a programme on TV that said they were, and it had a nice theme tune. Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go make a tinfoil hat..."

In terms of WiFi it answers its own question by quoting from the HPA:-

---
The agency says: ‘On the basis of current scientific information Wi-Fi equipment satisfies international guidelines. There is no consistent evidence of health effects from RF exposures below guideline levels and therefore no reason why schools ... should not use Wi-Fi equipment'.

The Health Protection Agency says that exposure to Wi-Fi radio waves is comparatively low compared to that of mobile networks — 20 minutes on a mobile phone is equivalent to a year spent in a wireless classroom.
---

The last part of the article, discussing how a classroom based heavily on the use of display screens would compare to workplaces operating under DSE is of more interest, as it's the only part of this where there's actually a valid health argument. Kids don't work on laptops all day yet, but in a few years they will be.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 08 January 2008 12:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonathan Breeze
The footnote to the article says it was first published in July 2007.

I'm not aware of any new data that has come to light in the scientific or safety press since then (though that could be my inattention).

That said, there have been at least two forum threads in the last 12 months on the issue, which may shed more light.

These are:

http://www.iosh.co.uk/in...iew&forum=1&thread=28237

and

http://www.iosh.co.uk/in...iew&forum=1&thread=25283


Happy researching.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.