Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 11 January 2008 11:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MAK Discuss please. All responses appreciated.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 11 January 2008 11:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Michael Battman No. Surely, the whole point of the client's signature is to confirm that they are aware of their duties. If the CDM-C signs it; how does the client prove they are aware of the duties?
Admin  
#3 Posted : 11 January 2008 12:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By cathal One of the changes in CDM 07 was to remove the 'Clients Agent' this was seen as a direct move to identify the Client as a duty holder, this will become more evident when the corporate manslaughter and Homicide act is introduced. The CDM-c Duties are most explicit in his duties to advise the client so if the CDM-c then signs off on the F10 form then he undertakes the role of the client making him responsible to introduce and make available resources for Health Safety welfare and pre start up costs. I am sure that they would realise how far they have strayed off the CDM track. The CDM-c cannot sign the F10 Form unless he is a client carrying out his duties under CDM 2007 Cathal
Admin  
#4 Posted : 11 January 2008 12:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mike Charleston I hold a long-standing CDM-C role with a client who expects that, all other things being equal, I will be involved with a series of projects over several years. They are all small-scale but that's not the point. He sat with me and explored the CDM07 issues to my satisfaction and is entirely aware of what they require of him as a client. We came to the conclusion that it was administratively more convenient for me to sign F10's on his behalf, so we agreed a form of words that recognise his duty but delegates responsibility to me as CDM-C. Any use of this delegated responsibility is naturally followed through with an emailed copy of the relevant F10. We use an equivalent F10 format and word-processed signature so that it can easily be converted to .pdf format (again for our own convenience). Not a bomb-proof system but certainly suitable and sufficient by my assessment; certainly sufficient for the HSE to have raised no objections to date. So where's the problem? Mike
Admin  
#5 Posted : 11 January 2008 13:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter See this thread: http://www.iosh.co.uk/in...iew&forum=1&thread=26900
Admin  
#6 Posted : 11 January 2008 13:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis The regulations are specific - the F10 is signed by or on behalf of the client. In spite of the smoke screen created by many this means that the CDMC can sign the F10 but there are two essential conditions for the CDMC to consider: 1) CDMC must be confident that the client is aware of his duties 2) The client has agreed to him undertaking the signature on his behalf. I know that at one time the HSE attempted to subvert the meaning of "by or on behalf of" to mean only the client or an employee can sign. The legal precedents for the meaning of the phrase have been well affirmed in other areas of law and the HSE now recognise that their attempted changes to meaning were not supportable in court. No competent CDMC will place his organisation at risk by signing for an unknown, to him, client but equally many have longstanding close relationships with some client organisations and these pose no risk in providing the signature. Bob
Admin  
#7 Posted : 11 January 2008 14:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MAK Dear Bob, I was hoping to snare you with this net, I hope you dont mind! :) I will be sending you an email privately, and again I hope you dont mind. Dear all, Thanks for the link again, I couldnt find it, despite participating in that discussion back then. I was aiming not to re agitate this hornets nest, but just to ascertain whether CDM-C's find that they now have invaluable support from the client or client organisations? Have things improved? Have you experienced resistance by clients to sign? if yes, is this due to expediency or avoidance? If you are signing on the clients behalf, are you content to do so? is it on occasion? at critical times only? do you have a letter indicating you have the clients permission to do so? Are you satisfied that you are being given the opportunity that your client is aware of his responsbilities?
Admin  
#8 Posted : 11 January 2008 16:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis MAK Just remember I can be expensive!!!!:-) :-) ;-) Bob
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.