Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mark Bywater
I have just come across a final exit door at a company that we have just become responsible for which is in a warehouse environment.
Basically, the personal door leads down about 6 steps to a large iron concertina door which has a lock. The key for the lock is kept in a break glass at the side of this door.
In the event of a fire / other emergency, about 4 people would use this exit.
Question: Is it acceptable as a fire exit?
My gut feeling was probably, yes, due to the key being always available, the door is in constant use anyway (always unlocked during normal working hours) and the number of evacuees is small.
Your thoughts please.
Thanks,
Mark
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By David Whaley
Mark,
Door that are locked and require a key to open them are not normally accepted as a fire exit. Even thought the key is kept in a break glass container. The Fire and Rescue Services have had some bad experiences over the years with this type of exit. For example the lock gets changed but the key doesn't. Also you need to take into account of how people will react in an emergency, could they drop the key, etc. I would advise looking at alternatives.
David
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Edward Shyer
Mark
as you say the door is unlocked during normal working conditions this i do not believe this is a problem as such. I would be more concerned about whether or not there would be difficulty in the opening of a large iron door. Is everyone who would need to exit through this door able to easily open it.
Regards
Ted
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Amanda
We have just inherited a similar situation after moving to a 'new' site. The door is on a lock with a key in a box. We have just changed to a 'butterfly' lock so staff can unlock the door from the inside on the advice from the Fire Officer doing the walk round. This is for many reasons , one being the key could go missing thus leaving persons at risk.
Hope this helps.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By alan brotherton
Anyone who puts an emergency escape key in a box on the wall has obviously never considered, (in their fire risk assesment)persons blinded by smoke, stumbling around in the dark in a panic situation easily locating the box and obtaining the key and then finding the tiny keyhole to insert it into (that is if they have not injured their hands in the fire and are able to do this). However we do see this type of system in place which is beyond me when so many safer alternatives are available.
I think also that the type of door you mention should be regularly examined for ease of opening, and clearing/ lubricating of any tracks and hinges etc. and a clear responsibility placed on someone to ensure it is unlocked immediately the building is occupied each day.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By J Knight
Just like to endorse what has been said already; push bar or butterfly lock rather than key, as Sod's law states that the key will go missing about 15 minutes before the fire starts,
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By GeoffB4
The door is always unlocked when staff are on site and is in constant use. The key is held in a break glass box nearby.
I'm absolutely fine with that. Talk about maintence and opening such as door etc has already been dealt with by the initial contributor saying the door is in constant use. Any problems would be immediately spotted.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter
My sense of ironic cynicism forces me to ask:
Does the key behind the glass actually fit the lock?
In all other respects, and others state, this isn't acceptable anyway.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By GeoffB4
Why not Ron?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By DKH
IMO for what is is worth, if the door is open throughout hours of occupancy & the door is well maintained, well oiled for ease to open & inspected regularly, based on the low level of occupants i don't see this as a major issue. ask you local fire service round and get their take on it.
If your still in any doubt get someone in to quote for a replacement!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim
Roller shutter doors are not considered for means of escape for many reasons.
This door, however, is always open during working hours so it would be acceptable providing that someone is responsible for checking the availability of the fire exit at the start of each shift. Checks should be recorded in writing and management should also check that the checks are being made and recorded.
There is always a conflict between security and fire safety but there is always a solution.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim
Sorry I just re read the original and see the door is concertina and not roller shutter. No difference to my advice though.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By pluto
I have personal experience of this arrangement NOT working, including massive rows with the occupier stating key is ALWAYS available only to re-visit two days later and find said key missing!
Although you could argue a case based on door always being unlocked during occupied hours (no security issues there then?), I would strongly recommend that you replace it with one of the dozens of better solutions on the market. The sliding door is also a further problem but for the limited numbers, (assuming all can operate door), I would reluctantly accept it.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By shaun mckeever
If the door is unlocked when the building is occupied then what is the problem? You have an exit route that is available. I agree that it is preferable to have butterfly locks, thumb turns or push pads etc.
So long as the door is unlocked then you have provided an exit route and that is what is required. Just make sure that there is an opening up procedure in the morning. Whoever is first in must have the responsibility of unlocking the door.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter
GeoffB4 - you asked why I don't consider the arrangement described acceptable.
A similar situation arose at one of the premises I advise. On two of my visits, the door had not been unlocked.
In other respects, the "arrangement" did not work outwith 'normal' hours and cleaners were placed at risk.
We have to move with the times on these sort of things I think?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By GeoffB4
Ron, the doors are in constant use and in any case a key is easily available. What could be simpler?
I don't know what you mean by moving with the times? I do know that unless we adopt practical and pragmatic solutions and attitudes we lose our credibility.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By TBC
Some great advice been given here. I knew of two occasions when on my inspection the keys did not resemble the one in the box and indeed when tested - did not fit. This was quite a few years ago now and in both cases the doors were only used in emergencies. The owners had not put in the correct keys because they were afraid of loss of goods etc. I know your case is different because the doors are in use during the day, but for others one to look out for.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By GeoffB4
Good point TBC, and clearly shows the specific circumstances have to be taken into account.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bob Shillabeer
A bit puzzled, if the door is open such a lot how is it locked? Why is there a lock and key in use? How do they open the door without using the key? How often is the key checked to ensure it is the right one?
Take a simple view and check how the door is normally used, if it is part of a roller shutter system, look for a new escape route.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By TBC
Hi Bob
Apparently it is a large iron concertina door - not roller shutter, but still might be a bit awkward for some just the same.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By chrisc0v0c
I know this is somewhat a dead subject but we have a site we have some works to carry out on and the issue is that the landlord has the following situation.
On a newly occupied area (a large warehouse) the rear external fire exit which also serves another warehouse containing 3 double leaf doors exiting to said route has at its end a door requiring "key access".
The said key is in fact not "even" in the locality of the door, it is within a key box at each door leading on to the external route.
We are upgrading the emergency lighting on the route and we ourselves got stuck at the respective door due to no prior knowledge of the key situation.
We are trying to find a solution with the landlord, he realises the "key" issue but the trouble is because the route is "external" and the otherside of the fire exit door leads to a "less" secure fire exit walkway, leaving a key box at the door or using any other non-key action only hardware compromises his building security.
Before anyone jumps in with "sod security, lives are all that counts etc!", the landlord if he has no choice will do what is required, but to throw it out there does anyone have another solution?
I know a solution could be a fire alarm link using retaining magnets but I am always concerned about the need for the exit in situations not related to fire or if an incident occured where an individual somehow, perhaps as we did managed to be trapped outside for any other reason!?!
Any feedback?
Thanks in advance...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Neil R
Everyone seems to have focused on the unlocking of the door. Why has no-one mentioned the 6 steps that lead to the door?
You shouldn't really have steps leading to an emergency exit, but you need to look at the condition of the steps, location of handrail, lighting around the stairs. If you have a disabled person in the premises whats the procedure for getting them out, does it involve these 6 steps? whats the procedure for getting them down etc.
Lastly the interior personal door, can it only be opened from inside. For example if these people open the door go down the stairs, can't open the external door and come back up will the interior door be shut leaving them trapped?
Obviously its hard to imagine without seeing the setup. But you can't just focus on the door and key (which isn't very good in truth) you must look at getting to the exit and out the other side.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By GeoffB4
You shouldn't have steps leading to an emergency exit. Have I missed something? Don't most premises with more than one floor have steps leading to emergency exits?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Neil R
You are correct Geoff, normally you would have a straight out exit on the ground floor and an exit with stairs external or internal on other floors. Now through the process of your fire/ evacuation plan you would place disabled people or more vunerable people shall we say on the ground floor. If you only have one exit from a building or area should the the exit have steps involved? i would say no.
My point was this guy has a fire exit with 6 steps and iron door at the end, so whats the plan for disabled people? is there another exit somewhere that is accessible? If this is the only exit then its no good.
When deciding whether a fire exit is suitable you can't just focus on one thing (i.e the door) you need to find out more. Thats why in my post i simply suggested looking at suitability of the steps, lighting etc and plans for disabled people.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By ScotsAM
The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005
P14(2)
(d) emergency doors must open in the direction of escape;
(f) emergency doors must not be so locked or fastened that they cannot be easily and immediately opened by any person who may require to use them in an emergency;
This would suggest a single or simple action in order to open the door.
My gut reaction is to say that unlocking a door is unsuitable, especially as the key isn't in the lock in the first place.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim
Yes acceptable as long as the occupants are able to use the exit route to leave the building.
What about disabled/wheelchair users? Can they access the steps? Reach the key? Open the gate?
You will probably come back with no such people employed but what about visitors to the premises?
Have you tried this route during a fire drill?
Fire risk assessment...........................
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Steve Cartwright
Mark
If I was you I would contact your local Fire Authority, because you will not get a straight answer on this forum.
In the past I have had similar situations as yours in different regions of the country and the local Fire Authorities all said the same. Providing the door is unlocked when employees are working and it can easily be opened then it will be fine. If a key is required to open the door providing the key is easily accessable to all, again it will be fine.
No ifs, buts, what about this or that, have you got this or that, if my anti had ***** she'd be my uncle and all the other rubbish people come out with. Your local Fire Authority will tell you.
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By PMW
Steve - as a relative newbie to this site, I am interested to know - do you honestly feel its a waste of time asking for specific advice on this forum? I appreciate that there are time wasters, moaners etc but most of us are able to sort out what's what. I have read some very helpful advice on this site. Surely the obvious answer is to contact the local fire service. Personal experience and opinion is important too?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Steve Cartwright
PMW
If you want to ask that question you should start another thread.
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By pluto
Sorry to return to this subject but after twenty yeas in this game I have lost count of the number of times I have been 'sold' this story only to return and find it not true. Management changes, people off sick, workforce varies, etc.
My argument is always 'why?' There are so many better arrangements available. We should not accept the lowest common denominator argument. Sometimes there is no absolute business case for doing something...but it remains right. Change the lock or better still, install a small exit door alongside the warehouse shutter.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By W. Findlay
Good Morning
ScotsAM response regarding the RRO is correct, in addition, I would direct you to BS 9999 Section 14.3 parts e & f and also Section 16.5.2. and BS EN 179.
Hope this helps.
Regards
W
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kirsty Davies2
I agree to most above mentioned posts. You need to consider the other factors such as suitability of steps, awareness to presence of the key by the employees and contractors etc
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Mark Bywater
To the IOSH moderators,
As the "owner" of this thread and having had sufficient answers over a year ago, may I kindly request that this thread is locked as it appears to be drifting somewhat, and a further thread has been started to pick up that different topic.
Kind regards,
Mark
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.