Rank: Guest
|
Posted By s mac
I work for a multi-site art gallery and am the only safety professional to cover many departments, all staff and issues of public safety.
The culture is hopefully on the up now but for years before I joined, safety was seen as a lesser priority by many, largely due to the attitude of the former MD.
We have a way to go in terms of line managers actually carrying out or having the appropriate training and knowledge to fulfil their safety responsibilities as defined in the safety policy.
I have been trying to engage the support of the senior management team and they completed the Directing Safely course in September but it is a slow process to engage enthusiasm for health and safety generally, although they do better at 'reactive' issues, as opposed to 'proactive'.
This environment is quite varied and specialised in risk areas, for example art handling and for particular exhibitions. There is also public safety for exhibitions and corporate events.
I've inherited a serious lack of risk assessments and intend to train line managers this year but for now this responsibility and several things outwith my remit are falling to me.
I wondered would anyone perhaps working in a similar environment be able to send me any sample risk assessments? Searching the web didn't generate anything except a risk assessment for school parties visiting art galleries, I've tried Google et al.
It's the all too familiar scenario of one safety practioner trying to deal with everything and with no admin help or training officer, it impacts on what I can achieve as an individual.
If anyone can offer advice re the above, particularly from a similar role, it would be very much appreciated.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Philip Beale
I have emailed you a copy of our permit to work system 7 pages but this breaks down to several areas the most useful may be the on the spot risk assessment, and the other pages may give you a starting point as you get involved further down the line.
please don't pass on the document or use it with our company logo it's just to give you a starting point. Some areas are for specific hazards to our site.
Phil
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Lilian McCartney
Is the Art Gallery Local Authority run? (in Scotland the main ones tend to be).
The LA will/should have a H&S Adviser to help.
In the longer term (doesn't help rigth away)
try forming, or see if one exists, a group of H&S poeple in the same subject area - though I guess this migth mean a wide geographical area who you could meet and exchange views etc
You sound as if you've 'hit the ground running' and have acheived something which some of us haven't - i.e. getting the Directors to training.
Keep going and I hope you don't hit too many brick walls (not literally) and if you do, don't despair.
Good luck
p.s. I don't have anything for this are or I would send it to you
Lilian
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert.
Being an art gallery I suppose the works of art are risk assessed against fire, flood and other worst case scenarios even cleaning. they may even be assessed to keep the public away.
If a work of art is irreplaceable, or damaged, it costs money. Then what about a life.
Ask the senior managers to look at the public as valuable works of art and risk assess from there.
Things you could address at the start are accesses, egresses, addres systems, evacuation, cleaners, first aid, security, other works, general public protection, ie barriers, closures. they needn't be comlpicated.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By s mac
Thank you for all the responses so far, much appreciated.
Lillian - to answer your question, we are not run by the local authority (eg which I know Kelvingrove is in Glasgow) - we are a non departmental government body, classed as a 'charity'.
As you say, it would be useful to establish contact with other safety practitioners in a similar role, even if geographically distant.
I am in a safety working group with a couple of other practitioners but their environments are different.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter
It seems to me from recent events that a slightly different regime for safety is applied (by the enforcing authorities?) in Art Galleries.
I refer colleagues to the article on page 8 of this month's SHP Magazine.
This states that although there have been 10 injuries arising to members of the public tripping over or falling into the "Shibboleth 2007" floor fissure at the Tate Modern, there are no plans to prevent further incidents!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By s mac
Thanks Ron. As you have identified, modern art involves many forms and it's no longer just 'safe' gallery rooms with paintings on the walls. I carry out specific risk assessments for 'unusual' or potentially hazardous exhibits and sometimes there is a 'imbalance' between the needs of the artist and the public safety but this should be considered within the assessment and control measures agreed. I'm aware of the changes in crown immunity under the Corporate Manslaughter Act which are going to affect government departments etc(Rospa bulletin referred).
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.