Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 23 January 2008 10:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By R.KINGSTON Hi everyone, I'm trying to find information on a recent prosecution where all Four duty holders were prosecuted under CDM 1994...HELP..!!! R.K
Admin  
#2 Posted : 24 January 2008 08:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Bellis There was this one in Warrington a couple of yers ago - came to court last year -everyone was held liable - prosecutions against all parties - but not all CDM http://www.gnn.gov.uk/co...reaID=2&ReleaseID=234197 http://www.hse.gov.uk/press/2006/gnn142474p.htm In September 2002 a worker fell eight metres to his death when he stepped on a fragile roof in Warrington . The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) successfully brought criminal charges against five different parties, between them they were fined a total of £87,000 and ordered to pay over £57,000 costs.. HSE construction inspector said: "This prosecution follows the tragic death of a young man on a site in Warrington. Unfortunately, his death is not unique: on average, one person is killed on a construction site in Great Britain every five or six days, and many more are seriously injured." Elmsgold Haulage Ltd, Manchester and the Managing Director of Elmsgold Haulage Ltd. pleaded guilty to two charges in that they failed to provide a safe system of work and failed to ensure that people working on site were properly trained and supervised, and a third charge that they failed to ensure that lifting equipment was properly examined and inspected. Elmsgold Haulage was fined £10,000 for each charge and ordered to pay total costs of £10,000. The MD was fined £5,000 for each charge and ordered to pay costs of £5,000. Demolition contractor Excavation & Contracting (UK) Ltd of Manchester, and the company's former MD, pleaded guilty to a charge that they each failed to ensure that risks to non-employees were adequately controlled. Excavation & Contracting (UK) Ltd was fined £35,000 and ordered to pay £10,000 costs. The former MD was fined £20,000 and ordered to pay £30,000 costs. Elmsgold Haulage's site foreman pleaded guilty to a charge that he failed to ensure the safety of other employees. He was fined £2,500 and ordered to pay £2,500 costs. At an earlier hearing on 31 January 2006, a partner of Knight Frank, property management company, pleaded guilty to two charges under the CDM regulations and fined a total of £7,000 plus costs of £4,500.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 24 January 2008 09:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By R.KINGSTON Thanks for the response Paul. Interesting case study...! RK
Admin  
#4 Posted : 31 March 2008 16:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By C.W Any chance you can let me have a copy or a link cheers
Admin  
#5 Posted : 31 March 2008 16:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jane Blunt The link is: http://www.hse.gov.uk/press/2006/gnn142474p.htm Jane
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.