IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Discussion on Entering a sikh house with safety boots
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bill Morrison The moderators have pulled this discussion while they discuss the content etc, not sure how long it takes to do this?
I would suggest this is a perfectly reasonable discussion and the sort of real life issue we should be able to discuss freely without offending anyone , or the politically correct police stepping in.
Rant Over
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Rob T yes - agree with Bill entirely. The original discussions in the 70's concerning whether Sikhs should wear crash helmets was deemed a legitimate topic at the time the legislation came in and there are going to be many times when these types of situation occur which may offend someone. That doesn't mean that it is not legitimate debate. There is a serious safety question to be debated here and and as such this must be allowed to continue.
I haven't replied to this subject but I have watched with interest and there have been some relevant comments.
This is a sensorship too far.
Rob Todd - CFIOSH
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jay Joshi As I did not view the removed responses, I cannot comment about those.
I personally do not feel offended about such matters, but occasionally, responses can be perceived as insulting to a particular group, especially if it goes beyond the health & safety merits.
Having worked with a local authority in the past, if you do not provide a service, there must be an extremely good reason. In general terms, health and safety is a good reason, but without knowing the details of "why" , I am afraid it is extremely difficult to comment on it.
I had also contributed to the Mosque thread some months ago.
In several eastern religions/faiths,( I specifically refer to Hinduism ) there are customs and beliefs that have carried on that may have been relevant at that time in history centuries & decades ago, but we would find it strange now.
My own grandparent generation (born in very early 1900's) would perhaps do the same, i.e not permit shoes, especailly anything leather in any room that has a worship area. My parents were different and I do not practice any of it as I am pragmatic.
It perhaps made sense in those times not to transmit the "dirt" from the shoes as hygiene standards were different & medical prevention by vaccines etc was non-existent. So, it is more of a "clean" and "unclean" issue than anything else and in most cases, at least for the hindu community, this can be easily resolved.
Normally, it is a place of worship,where shoes(leather)are not permitted. It is strange that this refers to a residential property.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete Longworth Whist I agreee that the thread was a legitimate area of debate I have to say that some of the responses were very near the knuckle to say the least and the thread was in danger of degenerating into a "why do we have to do this sort of thing in our country?" sort of debate. In my view that is why it was "pulled".
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By M Forbes This was exactly my point in my posts (which were removed)
This nation is so worried about offending these religious groups that censorship is being put in place, laws are being allowed to be ignored by these groups, and pleasing these minority groups now becomes more important than pleasing the majority because not addressing the minroity groups views could appear to be racist!. . . .
Britains going crazy and this is just Political Correctness gone wrong
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bill Morrison We are in danger of not being able to discuss, or give an opinion on any issue that may cause offence to someone or a particular group. It would appear that IOSH does not feel comfortable on a debate on the real issues H-S professional face, but if you want to request a pro-former risk assessment feel free.
These are real issues and we should be allowed to debate and discuss these issues freely,
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48 I agree that we should be able to discuss any matters relating to safety in a professional manner. But that is the point, a professional manner. There is a clearly an apparent conflict between a safe system of work and a personal, in this case religious, belief in the case that started the thread. If our discussion is limited to helping to resolve that conflict through exchanging ideas on how to reach a workable position that is acceptable to both sides; then I support that. If it is to promulgate views and opinions about the application of diversity and equality in our society, that is not relevant IMHO and should quite rightly be removed from this forum.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete Longworth Dead right Pete48
The point of the thread was not about someone's religious beliefs, it was about whether someone should be working without a particular form of protection. As I said in the previous thread, the house owner in question, whatever his beliefs, had an absolute right to ask anyone entering his premises to remove their footwear. In response, the workman in question then had the right to refuse to enter the premises. That was the point of the thread. In the event of any further discussion can we please leave religion, diversity and latent prejudices out of it.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By AlisonSM They could have removed the posts deemed "offensive" and left the rest. I offered a sensible suggestion - the workman should have explained why the boots were necessary then had a look at the work to be done. If he then felt that it would have been dangerous to proceed, he could have sought help from head office and refused to continue (explaining again to the householder why he was not willing to proceed). I think a lack of communication was the main issue here..
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By IOSH Moderator The discussion on entering a Sikh house with safety boots has not been 'pulled', only suspended while the Moderators discuss what to do next. This can take some time because the Moderators all have full time jobs.
The topic of discussion is obviously legitimate - and that is why the discussion is still visible on this forum.
However, forum users must debate such matters in a professional manner and avoid anything that could be construed as racist, offensive or antagonistic. For the Moderators to hide any such posts does not constitute censorship.
Please look at our Acceptable Use Guidelines. These are what the Moderators are working to on the one hand, and also using their collective discretion to uphold the professional standing of IOSH when something out of the ordinary happens.
Regards Jane
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By GARRY WIZZ Thats one hell of a request, How about we all go to our MD's and say , when you come to work please can leave your opinion of elf&sfety at home and just comply with the law.
We should on this forum stick with the subject tittle. How ever if religion is the root of the problem the answer must address the issue.
However as is the way of this country, we are petrified to go near the subject, see how IOSH has pulled the topic. Prejudice is denied and hidden.
It is not for IOSH to sort out this racial mess but the problem is that no one is willing to have a go. So to mind IOSH may as well just be up front and state what it actions will be as demonstrated by this topic.
Any question that is connected to race / religion or illicit replys that may refer to race religion shall be eradicated.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete Longworth Religion was not the root of the problem in this case. The root of the problem was, should an employee work without protection. The householder could just as easily asked him to remove his trousers because he didn't like the colour. The reason for asking the workman to remove his shoes is irrelevant. This was a private dwelling and the householder can make that type of request for any reason, any time he likes. The point is, what should be the response of the workman's employers.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Lilian McCartney I agree the point of the thread is valid, however, some comments included things like 'our laws' implying not only religious but racist bigotry as well. It perhaps didn't mean to read like that but it did. Being a sikh doesn't necessarily mean that 'our laws' aren't 'their laws' cos who knows where you're from and it shouldn't matter anyway.
Who knows where anyone was born, you can follow any religion with freedom in the UK, isn't this good? It doesn't mean you can break any 'laws' and I owuld expect the vast majority of people would agree (always being someone who doesn't).
The implications in some of the posts were getting a bit offensive and I think the moderators were correct to pull until they can get the chance to discuss.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bill Morrison What on earth is wrong with the term "our laws" it does not imply racist bigotry.
This is exactly the type of comment that stops reasonable adult discussion on topics just in case we offend someone.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By John J The issue did not need to mention religion. The topic could easily have been dealt with by saying a housholder has refused to let workman in wearing boots, what would be the next step. It doesn't matter whether its religious, new carpets or second tuesday in the month. I'm buying a new build house and have recently had carpets fitted. The sparks and plumber have taken their shoes off to do some of the snagging jobs. Strangely its not making the front pages...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jay Joshi Unfortunately, when we have had similar debates in the past, the originators start a thread, get information/advice, but do not "close out" the thread as to how they issue was eventually resolved.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bob Thompson CMIOSH
I did not view the post concerned but I would make the following observations. we frequently get home helps being asked to remove shoes before entering houses in order to keep the carpets clean, we do not allow this for moving and handling reasons ( the politically correct term for manual handling people). people frequently site freedom of choice and my home my rules even human rights. our stance is that it is every one's human right to return from work in at least the same condition as they were when they started. after all accidents are not driven by race colour or creed I sometimes think that this basic principal is lost in translation, and too often people may well decline to make decisions or take action because of accusations of discrimination.
Health and safety is porbably the most politicaly correct function of any society it endevours to safeguard everyone.
Bob
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By DRB M Forbes wrote:
"laws are being allowed to be ignored by these groups"
Would you like to point out which laws, if any, are being ignored by what you call "these groups"?
My recollection of the original post is that the householder asked the worker to remove his footwear. I'm not aware of this being a breach of any legislation, health and safety, or otherwise. But I'd welcome being corrected on this.
Its posts like M Forbes' that, rightly in my opinion, get posts taken down.
It's not political correctness it's just a matter of not being offensive to people
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By jom Throughout Asia, it is customary to leave street shoes at the front door of homes. It's a clean, respectful and pleasant custom.
John.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By IOSH Moderator Please note that the original thread is still visible, and that it has not been removed or 'pulled'.
Users of these forums must abide by the Acceptable Use Guidelines and it is the job of Moderators to intervene where necessary to safeguard the standing of IOSH and these forums.
Moderators work as a team, and therefore action is not always instant.
While we do not claim to be perfect in every way, we do request that forum users do not use the forums to make complaints against us or challenge why threads have been moderated or even removed. Queries of this nature should be done through the link provided.
Our ability to directly defend ourselves against complaints is very limited because we are bound by confidentiality. Anything that passes between us and someone who has had a contribution moderated is private - we simply cannot tell you!
The Moderators have now locked this thread.
Jane
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Discussion on Entering a sikh house with safety boots
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.