Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 29 January 2008 22:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AWJames
We are due to have a goods/passenger hoist erected to remove materials from a roof, and have been told that we need a haki staircase next to the hoist for emergency purposes. Is this correct?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 30 January 2008 10:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs
Sorry, I have no idea at all - but my advice would be to ask the person that told you this to prove it. It's often the easiest way to solve the puzzle.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 30 January 2008 10:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter
It sounds like a suggested means of escape should the lift break down, but I'm sure other arrangements using regular platforms, ladders, harnesses and lanyards would achieve the same (if not better) means of emergency egress.
You do need an emergency plan, but is someone trying to sell you something here that is not an absolute requirement?
Admin  
#4 Posted : 30 January 2008 11:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AWJames
have been told by the hoist company that it is required for an emergency, ie; fire. but how do get through the top of the hoist and onto the staircase safely? Answer, you cant !!!
Admin  
#5 Posted : 30 January 2008 12:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Merchant
It sounds like the supplier is making a different point - if the hoist is the sole means of access to the rooftop, then should the hoist not be usable for some reason, the people *on the roof* need a means of egress. Once in the hoist you're already egressing - you may need a plan to get someone out if they're trapped, but you don't need a specific fire escape just for that person.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 30 January 2008 13:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AWJames
Yes, sorry,i did'nt explain myself properly in the first place, the hoist is not the only means of access to the roof, there are 2 other staircases, which can be used by persons in the event of a fire/emergency.
we have contracted the hoist company to erect a hoist, the haki staircase, in my eyes, is not an idea rescue plan.

Please advise
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.