Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 08 February 2008 11:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Homer In near future we are going to be manufacturing and erecting a large kit framed building. There are working at height issues and also panel sizes will be up to 6 metres with roof having a 12 metre span. Can anyone point me at any good sites with info on this subject as bracing will be a big issue during erection sequence. Cheers
Admin  
#2 Posted : 08 February 2008 11:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Homer In fact the designers of these structures hold the duty to define the minimum/optimal bracing requirements during construction. It is not and should never be the subject of a site risk assessment. Designers after all are, or should be, aware of the swl of the various points and the stresses likely to be encountered and the frames ability to transfer load. Without these you may find the section 6 duties begin to bite hard, especially when one fails. Bob
Admin  
#3 Posted : 08 February 2008 12:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mitch As Robert has pointed out the designers are responsible, in an earlier incarnation I used to design large prefabricated structures/equipment housings. Part of my responsibilities was to prepare lifting plans, including diagrams and also specify any specialist lifting equipment, bespoke slings etc. The structural calculations included all lifting points, associated member's and braces whether fixed or removable.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 08 February 2008 12:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Homer We are the design and build contractor and have tasked an external designer to do his bit. Should we then be looking for the designer to give us an erection sequence and info on bracing etc.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 08 February 2008 13:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Homer No - this is the originating designer to do this as he IS the lead designer. Also - why pay more money to another designer when it is already a legal duty on the originating designer? You are less likely, as well, to get the best answers in such as the latter situation The lead designer knows the structure and is thus best positioned to determine sequencing, permissible wind loadings during erection, bracing, fixing etc. Do not let up on forcing this duty back on to him. Bob
Admin  
#6 Posted : 11 February 2008 08:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mitch Homer, Sorry for the delay, 12.30 Friday = pub! My experience was as a mechanical engineer designing acoustic and fire resistant housings for offshore and construction projects. Robert is quite correct in his statement, however the company I worked for were generally contracted by equipment manufacturers, pumps, turbines, generators, UPS systems etc (specialists in their own fields) to supply housings, which was our specialist field, as such we were responsible for all lift plans etc. Is this the situation here?
Admin  
#7 Posted : 11 February 2008 08:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Mitch My view was that these types of structure almost always need bracing during initial erection until a tie "bay" is formed that is able to support the rest of the structure. This means the sequence needs to be clearly defined as does the precise method of bracing etc. There have been a number of fatalities over the years where initial columns and panels have fallen over due to improper or undesigned bracing. Placing turbines etc onto erected steelwork is, I think, more predictable for a lifting company to plan and execute. Bob
Admin  
#8 Posted : 11 February 2008 08:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mitch Bob, That is my point, we manufactured pre-fabricated buildings which due to their size were erected around the machinery in large panels and sections. As such we were responsible for designing the installation ties and braces which were almost always removed during assembly, as you pointed out, when the structure reached the point of self support. This is what we were contracted to do as the "experts" by our customers who paid for that service. Ultimately there was a lead designer but they did not have the detailed expertise we offered. Mitch
Admin  
#9 Posted : 11 February 2008 08:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Mitch Sorry I misread you:-) I trust the designer gave you enough information to work out the answers but ultimately he should be paying you to do this not the contractor. I have several design house on my list and all use their temporary works or structural engineers to formulate the erection plan, inclusive of bracing. If the engineers are fully committed the work is commissioned out. Either way the designer retains ultimate responsiobility for the provision. I do not after all wish to return to the situation of less than 2 decades ago when designers simply passed all responsibility to the contractor to design and implement the erection plan, inclusive of any temporary works or other bracing/supports. Bob
Admin  
#10 Posted : 11 February 2008 09:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mitch Bob, I agree with you, as with most aspects of safety cutting pennies on simple bracing costs lives and pounds on site! Mitch
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.