Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 14 February 2008 12:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Graeme Main
Hello all, i received the following e-mail today and just wondered what your thoughts are i.e do you save that much fuel, what if you need to move your vehicle quickly but have to restart it etc etc etc

"I have heard on radio discussions of late, of the practice of switching off the car engine when not moving, even for a short period, such as at traffic lights. It is claimed that significant fuel savings are made as a result.

There are, presumably, corresponding savings in emissions for the environment. Apparently, this is common practice in Europe but not so in Britain."

Admin  
#2 Posted : 14 February 2008 12:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stefan Daunt
I would imagine, the fuel cost saved, will be out weighed by the cost of a new starter motor and flat batteries with lights left on and the engine not running.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 14 February 2008 13:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By holmezy

I went to a fleet safety do late last year and they reckoned that if you are sat in traffic for longer than 90 secs it is economical to turn off your engine, then restart. There are other environmental issues to consider in that while you are stationary you are pumping out CO2 etc so its probably a balancing act.

Holmezy
Admin  
#4 Posted : 14 February 2008 13:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham
Volkswagen actually produced and marketed a Golf that automatically switched off the engine whenever the car came to a stop. As soon as you pressed the accelerator the engine started again.

Doesn't appear in the current range, though, so presumably it didn't catch on.

Chris
Admin  
#5 Posted : 14 February 2008 13:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Darren (Daz) Fraser
I imagine that any fuel cost savings (depends upon criteria used to justify saving in first place) would be outweighed by the replacement of worn parts, which during the manufacturing process has consumed fuel for the production of energy, therefore I can imagine that there would actually be an increase in the amount of fuel used and not a saving (looking retrospectively). You would be better off looking at investing in one of the new hybrid cars that are on the market if you want to save fuel.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 14 February 2008 14:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Allen
The new BMW 1 series cars have an engine management system that stops the engine when the vehicle is stationary in neutral. The engine starts again when the clutch pedal is depressed.

I've been running one for three months without problem. You can override the function eg when constantly stop/start in a slow moving traffic queue.

Tha car has other energy saving features including 6 speed box and the alternator only takes power from the engine at certain times. the result is reduction in emmissions from 180 to 130 and lower rate of VED.

Admin  
#7 Posted : 14 February 2008 14:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AF
Once again, I am amazed at some of the comments being mentioned.

I often wonder, whether or not posters just make a statement for the sake of it without knowing exactly what they are talking about.

Any HSE professional who has an overlap into fleet safety (like I do) and works closely with the fleet manager (the vehicle experts) will share this common issue.

There is, and has been, no proof within the fleet industry that switching ignitions on and off on a regular basis is detrimental to starter motors/batteries etc. over and above normal wear and tear.

Whilst people are to be commended for trying to do their bit and reduce their emissions/carbon footprints, there is and are a multiplethora of industry experts offering services to assist companies/persons in becoming more greener.

Approximately 3 years ago, we introduced Vehicle Management Information software/boxes into some of our fleet of 120 odd vehicles. This helped us identify where these were located at any point, speeds they were driving, where vehicles were idling longer than a given period without moving, where the inefficiencies were, etc.

After a trial period we established multitudes of savings in terms of fuel reductions, emissions reductions, ££££'s of savings, almost eliminated bad driving practices etc, etc, so the benefits to the company were evident.

There were no differences in normal wear and tear of vehicles fitted with the VMI equipment against those without.

If you do a google on fleet management, there are a few companies across the UK who can demonstrate and prove such benefits.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 14 February 2008 14:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Shillabeer
Tried hard but can't see the implecations for H&S in this one.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 14 February 2008 15:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Darren (Daz) Fraser
AF, please do not take offence at the following if your comment was in any way aimed at my post.

I have worked in the automotive manufacturing industry in excess of 15 years, in operations mainly, but 3 years in product testing (driving around test tracks all day etc), part of this involved the driving of vehicles through towns at peak times, each time coming to a halt turning off the engine (not to save fuel, but to determine wear on parts). Whilst it was not proven to have a significant effect on wear rates, the tests did prove that there was a likelihood that certain parts could fail prematurely.

The recommended best practice to save fuel and reduce emissions is to operate a well maintained vehicle and sensible use of the go and stop pedals, as you have highlighted.

Admin  
#10 Posted : 14 February 2008 15:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Fornhelper
Word of advice...when I turn my car engine off the steering lock comes on...so to encourage people to shut down an engine when the car is still moving could, in some circumstances, result in a pretty nasty accident...particularly if quick, evasive action is necessary.

FH
Admin  
#11 Posted : 14 February 2008 16:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Mitchell
It isn't an H&S issue, but a lot of us have the E suffix now, or even the full QHSE moniker so let this discussion run. If you are pure H&S there is plenty of other stuff on here.

As an aside, the new hybrid cars are only much cop if you pootle at low speeds locally. On a long run the Lexus hybrid is wasted by the new BMW 320D (and I suppose the 120 and 520 too by default as they share engines) and it produces half the horsepower!). This was a study recently by a motoring group and, no, I don't have either a Lexus or 320d so have no bias.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 14 February 2008 16:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Mitchell
Just read my post and it sounded snooty, not my intention - I just didn't use smilies etc!
Admin  
#13 Posted : 14 February 2008 18:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GeoffB4
Quote from AF:
"Once again, I am amazed at some of the comments being mentioned. I often wonder, whether or not posters just make a statement for the sake of it without knowing exactly what they are talking about."

Isn't that the attraction of this board AF? And it applies equally to every contributor :-)
Admin  
#14 Posted : 15 February 2008 08:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Michael S Ward
Morning all

While on the face of it, it seems to be sensible, however I haven't seen, or am aware of, any scientific evidence to show that what is being suggested actually works. I think it's a bit simplistic, and taking it to the extreme, wouldn't 'freewheeling' down hills save even more fuel etc? If the suggestion was viable wouldn't the government and the various bodies like the AA, RAC, Brake etc suggest it? I think you have to take a more holistic approach to a whole set of issues.

Environmental

As most people press the accelerator when starting, to ensure they don't stall, the amount of fuel used doing this has to be offset against what is purportedy saved. Have you seen the increased emissions from the exhaust of a 'started engine' as against to a 'running engine'?

What about the increase wear & tear on engine parts e.g. starter motor, batteries, if switched off for a longish period oil will run from piston chambers and hence increase wear & tear on piston rings and linings. If these parts need to be replaced earlier or more frequently what about the environmental effect caused by the manufacture of the extra parts, fitting and testing them and then the environmental issues with disposal of the worn parts, oils and lubricants!

Economic

What may be saved in fuel would have to be offset against the issues as above, plus whilst a vehicle is off the road being serviced we are running other vehicles more frequently (increasing their wear & tear) or renting one to replace it. What would the insurers think, could it be seen as a greater risk and increase the vehicle policy?

Safety & Legal

Most modern cars have power assisted steering so with the engine off you would lose this and the steering wheel would lock, which if you have to move in an emergency could be hazardous. If you continuously switch of the engine in HGV's, LGV's, Arctic's etc over a short period of time you may lose the pressure required to ensure brakes and other systems would be effective. I once was told that it takes approx. 5-10 mins for a battery to replace the charge used in starting, hence continually switching engines off and on is likely to increase the risk of stalling and battery failure, especially in winter.

What about lights in winter, switching engines off may in some case only only leave you with side lights, and lights on without engine running would probably drain the battery quicker.

Switching off the engine is a deliberate act, as opposed to stalling etc, and this may be seen as you 'not being in full control of your vehicle' due to loss of ability to quickly manoeuvre, and hence could lead to prosecutions under the 'Road Traffic Act'.


Better ways to reduce fuel & emissions

Better ways to reduce fuel consumption and hence emissions is to follow government and various professional bodies guidance:
Regular maintenance,
Drive steadily, no harsh braking or fast accelerations,
Keep tyre pressures correct for the vehicle and its load,
Reduce number of journeys, and share cars if possible,
Better planning of journeys and monitor traffic information so you don't end up in long queues,
Think, do I really need to use this size vehicle or would a smaller one suffice?
Regards


Admin  
#15 Posted : 15 February 2008 15:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sheila EJ Keogh
interesting stuff for a friday pm. My car's handbook advises to switch off engine if sitting idling for 3 minutes or more. Each car make/model is likely to be quite different, so worth checking your handbooks.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 15 February 2008 16:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ian Mitchell
My car has a gauge that constantly tells you what your economy is. It is accurate right down to every tiny blip of the accelerator. This is a great way to promote fuel-efficient driving and somewhat dulls the fun of a good boot on an open stretch of road!

I find myself trying to maximise economy by using the measures that the previous poster but one talks about at the end of his post.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 16 February 2008 08:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Richards
So a queue of 10/20/30/+ cars is going to turn off the motors at stops of over 30/60/90 seconds ?

Like the queue on M1 at J9/8/7/ ?

So, given that it takes each driver a measured amount of time with the motor ON, to depress the clutch pedal and engage gear....how much longer is it going to take to start the engine as well ?
The traffic queue would get longer....the lights would see the stationery traffic as NO traffic, and switch faster....

Yes, I can see that the manual use of:
Gears neutral
Engine off.
would definitely decrease traffic speeds.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 18 February 2008 00:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony Priest
On most modern vehicles switching the ignition off will not activate the ignition lock. Normally it isn't until you remove the key from the ignition the lock will be activated. If you are stopped why would you require power steering?
Admin  
#19 Posted : 18 February 2008 18:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Alister Barclay
I saw a presentation last week from someone who monitored air quality in his car for a day. During the evening rush hour CO figures peaked (I think) just below 100mg/m3, which I guess puts an H&S slant on the discussion.
Admin  
#20 Posted : 11 March 2008 15:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David F Spencer
A bit late in the day to respond, but Auto Express mag are currently recommending switching off engines if idling for any length of time. Other posts mention BMW's having a cut-off & some 90's model VW's having the facility - some recently introduced Citroens have the same arrangement. If Citroen, with their reliability record can get it right, I have little doubt about other brands being OK.

One contributor writes about coasting to rest - not a good idea, as it uses more fuel than lifting off in gear in modern cars. Use the over-run to slow down, it's more economical, as it stops all fuel going to the engine with modern fuel supply systems.

However, planning the journey and reading the road ahead will probably save as much fuel as switching off every time you come to a halt. Now if you are heading north on the M1 around J23A on a Friday afternoon, then that's a classic case for switching off the engine...
Admin  
#21 Posted : 11 March 2008 16:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brett Day

In heavy traffic I often keep a larger than normal gap between me and the car in front in case the idiot behind who is sitting in gear 'slips' and lurches forward, keeping the engine running has in the past to move forward into the extra space and avoid being shunted.

Having the engine of would have meant a shunt.

Another view on things...
Admin  
#22 Posted : 11 March 2008 21:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Barry Cooper
Yawn
I'm off to bed
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.