Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
Crim
My first known exposure was 1968 during my first industrial placement from university - Crocidolite based rope.
According to the HSE current deaths are 4500 per annum and rising. Strange thing though is how few employers are following the training requirements of CAR 2007. I have seen no pick up in training at all. But 3 years is but a fleeting moment in construction.
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Wilson
Rob,
We are extremely busy doing this type of training and it is spreading as more and more construction companies and general trades get the message.
The HSE have produced an 'Enforcement pack' as part of the FIT 3 campaign during this year and will be targeting people who have the Duty to Manage and also the maintenance trades.
This is a very useful booklet as it tells HSE / LA enforcement people how to enforce in this area and you can easily see what they will be looking for and when they will serve notices etc.
http://www.hse.gov.uk/fo...fod/inspect/asbestos.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
Dave
Housing Associations seem to be the big pick up area but contractors are slow to realise what the requirements are and tend to argue when confronted with the information. Directors are beginning to come to terms with it. But the fruit has yet to fully mature.
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete Longworth
When I was at grammar school back in the late 60's we had a geology teacher who had a whole cabinet of mineral samples, one of which was asbestos (serpentine I think it was called then). He regularly used to scrape it with a pen knife to show it's crystalline structure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim
I was a firefighter in Liverpool from 1968 and fought many a fire in the old prefab type of house, (asbestos cement) without wearing breathing apparatus. Also many derelict property fires in and around the City. Risk assessments had not been invented then and the dangers of asbestos certainly were not known.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By GeoffB4
According to the HSE current deaths are 4500 per annum and rising.
I've no argument with these figures as long as we all appreciate they are due to past exposure and not present. To quote them without this caveat is quite misleading.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
GeoffB4
But the real problem is that the exposures of construction people especially have not ceased. I still get called upon to deal with situations where operatives have been working in the proximity of damaged lagging without prior information and training resulting in a lack of adequate protective measures.
2015 - 2020 is the current anticipated peak but it is not the end of the tunnel. People exposed today will still be dying, albeit in hopefully smaller numbers. My fear is that the way the problem is being managed on the ground means that the decline may not be achieved. We are not going to remove all asbestos from buildings until all current structures are demolished so the problem may need to be managed for several generations yet. Only by remembering the devastation of today and previous years can we hope to avoid the toll in the future.
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By GeoffB4
Quote: My fear is that the way the problem is being managed on the ground means that the decline may not be achieved.
Exposure in the UK today is nothing like it was in the 50s, 60s and some of the 70s, so to say a decline may not be achieved is not a valid statement. And why I mentioned the fatality figures quoted by you should not be read in isolation.
Asbestos is already a highly charged/emotional subject without more inflammatory statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
Geoff
The fatality figures up to 2010 will reflect the exposures of the 70s. The 80s forward are meant to be the start of a decline, originally projected at 2010 and is now put back at least 5 - 10 years. In other words there will continue to be a rise even though we apparently knew of the hazards and were supposedly controlling it from the 80s forward.
I am making the point that even today I am seeing control of the problem that is not significantly different to what I witnessed in the 80s in some places. On housing stock Lambeth blazed a LA trail which was over the top to a degree and was modified by other LAs but they were exceptions. Even now maintenance, refurbishment and other construction personnel are efffectively left to fend for themselves with regards to asbestos.
Dave W represents an organisation at the forefront of the problem nowadays but most persons working on asbestos are not employed by such people. They are the ordinary telephone installers, IT cablers, carpenters, electricians, plumbers, gas fitters etc etc. The problem has to be kept to the forefront of minds in order to reduce apathy. I would that I could be as confident as yourself that exposure was now not an issue.
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By GeoffB4
Bob, please show me where I have said exposure isn't an issue.
Certainly I have indicated it is not as much as an issue as it was - because asbestos products are not being manufactured here, and are no longer being installed here.
It seems to me you keep making statements that do not accord with the facts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Wilson
Geoff I agree, however today and I mean TODAY there will be Botchit Builders Ltd out there knocking lumps out of this stuff with no real knowledge of what they are letting them selves in for.
About 25% of the deaths today are from this type of worker who installed or worked with it, we will get a reduction in the numbers however until employers / industry understand that this is still a real issue then we will still see this continue for what is entirely preventable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
Geoff
We agree on many issues and there is no point in splitting hairs over this. Like Dave, I have seen far too many situations where operatives have been placed in a position where they have little of no information or other protection. Until this is a thing of the past we will see this problem dagging on. The message that it is only past exposures now causing problems will be seized upon by many who wish the problem away.
It is a fine line to tread between emotional and rational responses at times.
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By GeoffB4
No problem Bob.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Wilson
From a H&S point this is something we have to deal with every week where we are asked to go in and clean up the mess etc and for what is a basic step eg be wary and if in doubt "ASK IF THIS IS ASBESTOS!" and I see it time and time again. As does anyone else who works in the Asi industry
From a business point of view it generates income for us so great.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Robert K Lewis
I think the HSE are missing out on some much needed cash for the revenue and customs as well!:-)
There seems a great reluctance to deal with some major public organisations who are sometimes among the worst offenders. I have had 4 from one such body in the last 2 years - all insulation exposures. The affected persons are often subcontractors afraid of losing a major public sector client if they make too many waves. Equally they still fight shy of too much asbestos training, on the basis that they will not work on asbestos if they know it is there. Trouble comes when they do not know!!
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Wilson
Talking about Revenue and Customs did yu know that you can claim back 125% of the cost of asbestos removal in business tax including the survey as well.
Obviously there are a few caveats so speak to your Tax advisor / consultant if you are thinking of buying property
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.