Rank: Guest
|
Posted By david tompsett
Advice please
We had in our employ from 1985 to 1992 a mechanical fitter.
I have just received from our HR department a claim from the solicitor of the past employee (now 76) claiming damages for hand/arm vibration syndrome.
Can anyone tell me what my duty of care (liability) is regarding the claim, considering his employment pre dates the Control of Vibration at Work Regs 2005 and the 6 pack?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bob Shillabeer
Don';t worry about it send the letter to your company solicitors, they will ask the right questions for you. The claim is now outside your control and should be managed by your company solicitor, thats what you pay him for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By David Bannister
David, if during his employment with you he became harmed as a result of that work, then regardless of the Vibration Regs or 6 pack it is possible your duty of care to your employee has been breached and you will have some liability.
Previous advice about passing this on to your legal advisers is good or alternatively to the insurers who provided Employers Liability cover for those years. The insurers during the years the alleged harm was caused will deal with the claim.
You will be asked to provide as much information about the claimant's employment as possible, including any specific tasks in which he was involved, any training he received, any info on the tools used: just the kind of stuff that goes missing some 20 years after the event!
Good luck with any defence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Phil Grace
David,
It most definitely your EL insurers that should get the letter, not company solicitor or anyone else. This is an EL claim and the fact that employment predates the Regs is of no consequence. It all about your common law duty of care, not legal compliance.
Your current insurer will take over the matter on your behalf and from what you say about employment dates will seek to track down the insurer for the relevant period and get them to deal/settle (if there was negligence)
My advice is to pass on letter and not bother with additional data at the present - the insurer will tell you soon enough what is required and you could waste time trying to second guess what is needed.
Phil
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.