Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 22 February 2008 12:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By A Armer Our site of 250 people doesn't have a defibrillator. It's a question that is asked regularly - i.e. should we. We get a number of answers and have yet to conclude whether the 'pros' outweigh the 'cons.' We're about 6 miles from the nearest A&E along a busy ring road which our head office OHC says should be OK if we have an incident that could require such a machine, and that we'd be better off contacting the emergency services. Recently we have had 2 staff members suffer heart attacks - albeit at home - one of which died. The usual concern - what if that had happened at work and we had no defibrillator. Advice and suggestions welcome.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 22 February 2008 13:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adie Hi, I have recently completed the First Aid at Work course, and I asked about Defibrilators in the work place. The advice I received was that it is okay to have one however, as with all things, it should only be used by a trained operator. Both the St John Ambulance and the British Red Cross run courses that would be appropriate. I would think that you should weigh-up the true need for one in your work environment against the genuine likelyhood of a staff member suffering a heart attack in the work place. Finally, and having some first aid experiance, the basics of first aid cannot be ignored and have trained first aiders who can perform CPR should be the priority. Adie
Admin  
#3 Posted : 22 February 2008 13:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Bannister Hi A Armer, you are likely to get two extremes of opinion expressed on this forum, with a third view saying analyse your population "at risk" and act accordingly. Your recent history of two personnel suffering heart attacks may not necessarily be a good pointer but I am delighted that you are considering the subject. My personal view (previously expressed on this forum) is very much in favour of defibs to be more widespread. You may also wish to take a look at some previous threads where this subject has been discussed: use the "search forums" link on the right. Try http://www.iosh.co.uk/in...iew&forum=1&thread=32281
Admin  
#4 Posted : 22 February 2008 14:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Duell As David has just said, this is an argument that comes round and round on here - and like him, I'm firmly a member of the "pro" camp. If someone's heart goes into VF (not necessarily a heart attack), the ONLY successful life saving treatment is defibrillation - under these circumstances the heart compressions you learned on your first aid course are just a stopgap. Every minute's delay in defibrillation reduces the chance of survival by 10%. So - work out how long it would take an ambulance to reach your location (on average), and compare that to how long it would take a trained operator to fetch the unit and get to where the person has been taken ill. While obviously a trained operator is your best bet, the modern units are so automated that they are impossible to use incorrectly. The unit analyses the heart rhythym and will not deliver a shock unless one is required. Voice instructions tell you what to do at every step. The cons (apart from the obvious one of price) seem to be that used incorrectly, the units won't make things better, and can cause severe (electrical) burns to the ill person. While that may be true, bear in mind that if you don't dfibrillate, the person is probably going to die - so the choice is being dead, or being alive with severe burns. That's oversimplifying quite a lot, but don't let the burns argument put you off!
Admin  
#5 Posted : 22 February 2008 14:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Rob T hi, exactly the same as Paul above but just want to reiterate - the Defibs will not charge unless the person is fibrillating so ONLY a person who requires the charge could get a burn - these things cannot injure a person who has been misdiagnosed. Oh and one other quick point, although it is probably better to get some training, these things are idiot-proof and are on all street corners here in Monaco for any member of the public to use.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 22 February 2008 16:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adie Hi again, I should have said that I am a big fan of these devices (although, luckily, I never had to use one). They are simple and easy to use. I was trained in their use while serving in the Armed Forces and have carried one on duty. They remove the "human error" factor, and generally (depending on type) need no interaction between device and trained user once in operation. The workforce I support is small and tends to be young and fit, although some of the directors are older and not so fit. So my assessment for my organisation is that one is not necessary. However, if my organisation had the budget I would have one on site (we're a small site) and have plenty of trained operators. I believe that in most areas the ambulance service endeavour to be on scene within 15 minutes of a 999/112 call. I must disagree that CPR is a "stop-gap"! It is a basic life saver... I have the real time, hands-on experiance to know that. Ultimately, if you have the budget and trained users then I suggest getting one; but if not, then your organisations trained first aiders will be more than ample to cope with a heart attack. I wish you well.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 22 February 2008 16:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs "it should only be used by a trained operator." I would like to publicly announce that ANYONE passing me that has access to a defib is welcome to try to save my life should I be in fibrillation. By the way, they can hurt people - if you use them as a blunt instrument to bash them ;-) The reason training is pushed so hard, is that the British Resuscitation Council's protocol is to use them with normal CPR ... it is the CPR part that the training should concentrate on. Feel free to try and zap me with one if I am out cold and looking like death :-)
Admin  
#8 Posted : 22 February 2008 20:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By David Add me to the pro defib side :-) Im just starting my H&S career having done 20 years in pre hospital and in-hospital care. Just to add my 2 pennysworth : As has been said before, defibs are not designed for use with a heart attack patient but with a patient who is suffering cardiac arrest Yes, a lot of cardiac arrests have an initial heart attack /cardiac episode that causes it but there are other causes as well. Re the "stop gap" comment about cpr , if the patient is in cardiac arrest the cpr wont save him , it will keep his brain alive so that defibrillation may have a successful outcome. There are positive outcomes just from cpr but the research tends to point to those being respiratory arrests only. and lastly , there are lots of us around who have experience in defib training and placement programmes not just the voluntary aid societies. Also add me to the "zap me im fibrillating "list please. David
Admin  
#9 Posted : 23 February 2008 03:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Garry Mcglaid I await the backlash and i duck down, however i would always rather have any personnel get the emergency services as soon as, and in the meantime deal with basic first aid, I have had two many occasions when employees with a 2 hour course in the safe use of extinguishers think they are Red Adair, and lads with a half day course in first aid think they are Charlie from casualty. I would be more in the camp of not bothering with De Fibs and have my staff trained in the way to deal with an emergency in regard to reactions and procedures. I fully expect to be shot down in flames, but just giving my tuppence worth.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 26 February 2008 17:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Roy Lalor They are getting quite a lot of publicity in Ireland at present due to SADS (Sudden Adult Death Syndrome) Our new Occupational First Aid protocols will include defibrillation training from June 2008. If you buy one, then I think training is a must with together with updates and a company register of people trained. Our kids school bought three recently and my wife trained fourteen teachers. She also trained our own two lads, 15 and 13 respectively, so there's no big deal over learning. Roy lalor LTS First Aid Specialists www.lalortraining.ie
Admin  
#11 Posted : 27 February 2008 09:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Duell Adie said... *I must disagree that CPR is a "stop-gap"! It is a basic life saver* Absolutely, my apologies - I should have said, CPR is a stop gap WHEN THE PATIENT IS IN VF - missing that phrase changed the meaning of what I was trying to say! Even with the patient in VF, of course CPR is better than no CPR - but it won't, on its own, save a life.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.