Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

IOSH Forums are closing 

The IOSH Forums will close on 5 January 2026 as part of a move to a new, more secure online community platform.

All IOSH members will be invited to join the new platform following the launch of a new member database in the New Year. You can continue to access this website until the closure date. 

For more information, please visit the IOSH website.

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 27 February 2008 11:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By MICHAEL T We are currently working in someone else's premises. They are using our telehandler to move and load our equipment. Do we have any obligations to check licences or to see if the correct RA/MS's are in place? Regards Mike
Admin  
#2 Posted : 27 February 2008 11:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Merchant Difficult... under PUWER you are "supplying" the equipment to the other company, who is in turn supplying it to their workforce (the fact the employer isn't standing there doesn't matter in law). If you act as a supplier then you only have the obligations of making sure the equipment is safe, inspected and legal (as you would if you were a hire company). It's the employer of the person using it who is responsible for the training and RAs, but if you know that these are inadequate then you have an obligation under HASAWA to notify people about your concerns. In short, borrowing stuff between companies is a legal nightmare. Best not to bother.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 27 February 2008 11:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Harrison the fact is that they should have checked all your documentation, it makes perfect sense that if somebody else is using your equipment then you should also check theirs. it sounds like you missed the bit at the start where you both meet and agree who is responsible for what? in short check them if nothing else to confirm that the person is trained to operate that equipment or else you are in effect authorising any body to operate your machinery/equipment! and that would definitely have knock on effects for liability, people only ask after an incident has occurred, by then it is to late to check it.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.